LaHood Launches Spring Offensive In War On Distracted Driving

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Thus far, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood’s war on distracted driving has been largely a rhetorical hobbyhorse, giving the good Secretary a crowd-pleasing speech topic no matter where he finds himself. After calling the situation “an epidemic,” LaHood held a summit at which it was agreed that distracted driving is bad, especially when it causes deaths. Federal employees were subsequently barred from texting while driving government-owned vehicles during work hours. And that was just about it. Apparently chastened by his big build-up and lack of pay-off on this issue, LaHood has kept himself busy with the Toyota debacle of late, leaving distracted driving largely alone since last summer’s summit. Until he remembered that there was one crucial tool in his bureaucratic bag of tricks that he hadn’t yet used: the photo op.

LaHood spent $400,000 out of his budget to support pilot programs in Hartford, CT and Syracuse, NY aimed at “highly visible enforcement” of state laws against cell phone use while driving. The program is modeled on the DOT’s “click it or ticket” campaign which sought to raise awareness as well as enforcement of state seatbelt laws. LaHood explains on his Fastlane blog:

through all of my work to reduce this deadly epidemic, I have noticed one constant point of resistance: people asking, “What’s the point of these laws? It’s not like we can enforce them.”

Today, in Hartford and Syracuse we begin testing the idea that enforcement can change behavior by applying the lessons we learned when people raised the same criticism of seat belt laws or drunk driving laws.

The idea is to test tactics that could be used on a wider basis, but more realistically, it’s just another way to raise awareness. As LaHood puts it:

Look, distracted driving is not just a technology problem; it’s a human problem. And only by changing human behavior can we make our roads safer from this threat.

Together, I know we can do that.

And by “together” he means, with help from Oprah. Ironically, LaHood’s nearly half-million dollar campaign probably won’t “change human behavior” with half the success of a single Oprah show.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 17 comments
  • 05lgt 05lgt on Apr 09, 2010

    There's another problem with enforcement: the last driver to force me to engage ABS was pulling out from a stopsign looking only one direction (his right) with phone clamped to ear... in a police car. He looked furious. I suppose I'm lucky not to have been ticketed.

  • MarcKyle64 MarcKyle64 on Apr 09, 2010

    I have a simpler solution - mandatory jammers that activate whenever a vehicle is in Drive. If YOUR call is important enough to endanger MY life and MY health, then it's important enough to pull over and deal with. I don't want your distracted butt anywhere near me on the road. If people complain that the passenger can't call out, then we use seat weight sensors to deactivate the jammer just like airbag sensors. And expensive, punitive fines akin to DUIs for the scofflaws who deactivate the jammer.

    • Cmf46 Cmf46 on Apr 11, 2010

      This is a great potential solution to the texting problem. Please considering contributing it as a comment to the DOT's new proposed ban on texting at regulationroom.org

  • El scotto UH, more parking and a building that was designed for CAT 5 cable at the new place?
  • Ajla Maybe drag radials? 🤔
  • FreedMike Apparently this car, which doesn't comply to U.S. regs, is in Nogales, Mexico. What could possibly go wrong with this transaction?
  • El scotto Under NAFTA II or the USMCA basically the US and Canada do all the designing, planning, and high tech work and high skilled work. Mexico does all the medium-skilled work.Your favorite vehicle that has an Assembled in Mexico label may actually cross the border several times. High tech stuff is installed in the US, medium tech stuff gets done in Mexico, then the vehicle goes back across the border for more high tech stuff the back to Mexico for some nuts n bolts stuff.All of the vehicle manufacturers pass parts and vehicles between factories and countries. It's thought out, it's planned, it's coordinated and they all do it.Northern Mexico consists of a few big towns controlled by a few families. Those families already have deals with Texan and American companies that can truck their products back and forth over the border. The Chinese are the last to show up at the party. They're getting the worst land, the worst factories, and the worst employees. All the good stuff and people have been taken care of in the above paragraph.Lastly, the Chinese will have to make their parts in Mexico or the US or Canada. If not, they have to pay tariffs. High tariffs. It's all for one and one for all under the USMCA.Now evil El Scotto is thinking of the fusion of Chinese and Mexican cuisine and some darn good beer.
  • FreedMike I care SO deeply!
Next