Ford Foretells Fabulous Fourtune, Disses Displacement

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

The V6 wars may show no signs of stopping. However, Ford is quietly making contingency plans for a future conflict: The war of the four-bangers. Start hoarding your big bore brutes and head for the hills. Ford may want to take them away.

Ford will use the upcoming SAE World Congress, to be held from April 13-15 in Detroit, to showcase its engine-building prowess. Ford will demonstrate to the world’s most eminent confab of piston-heads that there is a replacement for displacement.

On display (at least in PowerPoint form) will be three new four-cylinder mills. A 1.6-liter Twin Independent Variable Camshaft Timing (Ti-VCT) Sigma I-4, a 2.0-liter direct-injection Ti-VCT Duratec® I-4 and a 2.0-liter Ti-VCT EcoBoost™ I-4.

That alone wouldn’t be worth the keystrokes for that post, wouldn’t Ford’s press release stress the point that small is beautiful, that V8 brutes are going the way of the dodo, and that the destiny of the V6 may be doubtful.

The four-bangers are Ford’s response “to shifts in consumer buying patterns with the introduction of more fuel-efficient small engines.”

In1969 “nearly 90 percent of vehicles sold in America were powered by V-8s,” says Ford. Last year, the share of the eights was down to 4.9 percent, “an all-time low,” while I-4s dominated with nearly 62 percent, according to Ford’s numbers. The way they are announcing this, they make us believe that that number will rise to European and Japanese proportions. It used to be an overseas thing to get more and more power out of smaller and smaller engines. No more: Ford is stepping up to the (most likely CAFE-induced) plate full of mini-mills.

The 2011 Ford Fiesta, powered by a 1.6-liter Ti-VCT I-4, is projected to deliver 40 mpg on the highway. The turbocharged 2.0-liter I-4 promises fuel economy “at least 10 percent better than a comparable V-6, while delivering class-leading power and torque for an I-4,” fawns Ford over the four.

And where are the batteries? Not included? A “more efficient battery-electric vehicle culture” receives only passing mention in the announcement. Ford forecasts that by 2020, plug-ins, hybrids, and plug-in hybrids might garner “up to 25 percent of total vehicle sales in the U.S., Europe and Japan.”

Paul Mascarenas, Ford vice president of Engineering Global Product Development, who happens to be chairman of the 2010 SAE World Congress, sounds like someone working at Volkswagen when he says: “As important as alternative energy sources are, in the foreseeable future most passenger cars and light trucks will continue to use petroleum-based fuels. Our challenge in the engineering community is to make them vastly more efficient.”

Ford makes it clear that the ICE is here to stay for the foreseeable future. And it looks more and more like a fourseeable future.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 78 comments
  • Cpmanx Cpmanx on Apr 10, 2010

    The actual numbers come from WardsAuto, and are summarized here: http://wardsauto.com/ar/engines_lose_ground_100315/ As you inferred, the 4.9% number refers only to cars, not to total vehicles. Among light trucks, V8s have a 40% share--a number that is clearly diluted by the RAV4, CR-V, Escape and the like.

  • Eastcoastcar Eastcoastcar on Apr 10, 2010

    I still recall reading all about the Model T's engine. Innovative design, used a bolt on head which was an innovation, and got 25MPG. It had extensions that allowed the engine to run farm machinery, and used a type of steel that Henry Ford noticed being used in French racing cars; he built a plant to produce this steel at his Detroit plant, and used it in engines, the suspension, and other key places to give the Model T incredible durability. And here we are all these years, decades later, still using internal combustion engines, as if there is nothing else out there. I accept that like the wheel, the internal combustion engine is just simply the best answer, but wow, think of how long this design has been around. "Forever."

  • ToolGuy I do like the fuel economy of a 6-cylinder engine. Will be watching this with interest. 😉
  • Carson D I'd go with the RAV4. It will last forever, and someone will pay you for it if you ever lose your survival instincts.
  • THX1136 A less expensive EV would make it more attractive. For the record, I've never purchased a brand new vehicle as I have never been able to afford anything but used. I think the same would apply to an EV. I also tend to keep a vehicle way longer than most folks do - 10+ years. If there was a more affordable one right now then other things come to bear. There are currently no chargers in my immediate area (town of 16K). I don't know if I can afford to install the necessary electrical service to put one in my car port right now either. Other than all that, I would want to buy what I like from a cosmetic standpoint. That would be a Charger EV which, right now, doesn't exist and I couldn't afford anyway. I would not buy an EV just to be buying an EV. Nothing against them either. Most of my constraints are purely financial being 71 with a disabled wife and on a fixed income.
  • ToolGuy Two more thoughts, ok three:a) Will this affordable EV have expressive C/D pillars, detailing on the rocker panels and many many things happening around the headlamps? Asking for a friend.b) Will this affordable EV have interior soft touch plastics and materials lifted directly from a European luxury sedan? Because if it does not, the automotive journalists are going to mention it and that will definitely spoil my purchase decision.c) Whatever the nominal range is, I need it to be 2 miles more, otherwise no deal. (+2 rule is iterative)
  • Zerofoo No.My wife has worked from home for a decade and I have worked from home post-covid. My commute is a drive back and forth to the airport a few times a year. My every-day predictable commute has gone away and so has my need for a charge at home commuter car.During my most recent trip I rented a PHEV. Avis didn't bother to charge it, and my newly renovated hotel does not have chargers on the property. I'm not sure why rental fleet buyers buy plug-in vehicles.Charging infrastructure is a chicken and egg problem that will not be solved any time soon.
Next