Who Benefited From Toyota's Woes?

Cammy Corrigan
by Cammy Corrigan

When Toyota stumbled there were (muted) shouts of glee around the car producing world. “Yay! They fell flat on their face! Let’s pick up the pieces.” Well, nobody said it openly, but action speaks louder than words: Ford and Hyundai revved up their “quality” aspects (wink, wink) GM and Chrysler fired up their incentives (it’s all on the taxpayers, so who cares?) Ford and Hyundai said “to hell with subliminal messages” and followed with the money. Even Nissan couldn’t help themselves and offered a bounty to deserting Toyotaphiles. February came and went and Toyota only registered a 9 percent drop (year on year after the carpocalypse). This was quite confusing. Especially given the fact that production had been halted and dealer stock was quarantined until fixed. Analysts had predicted double digit drops and were surprised themselves. Everyone had expected something out of a George Romero film to happen to Toyota. So, suddenly, this turns into an Agatha Christie story. “Who benefited from Toyota’s stumble”?

From Korea, The Chosun reports: “It wasn’t us!” They say they expected Hyundai-Kia to snap up absconding Toyota customers, but as they put it: “Hyundai and Kia, which were initially expected to be the greatest beneficiaries of Toyota’s woes, saw their sales in the U.S. rise 10 percent in February on-year, less than the 13 percent overall market growth seen that month. The sales results show that the Korean carmakers still need to do more to win over U.S. consumers. Declines in sales at Toyota translated directly into rising sales of similar car models at Ford, Nissan and Chrysler, but not at Hyundai and Kia.”

The Chosun posits that it must be Ford and GM who benefited from Toyota as Ford’s figures shot up 43 percent and GM’s rose 32 percent. But this doesn’t sit well either. As our Lord Niedermeyer reported, Ford’s fleet sale rose 74 percent and GM’s grew 114 percent. This accounts for the majority (but not all) of Ford and GM’s growth. Not to mention GM loaded up on leasing, too. So, now things are extremely hazy. If Hyundai-Kia and Ford didn’t win retail customers over with their quality and GM and Chrysler didn’t woo customers with their incentives, then who did? The most likely candidate would have to be Toyota’s cross town rival, Honda. With the Accord shooting up 41 percent, its close image to Toyota and even Acura growing through its CUV’s, it would seem that they are the main beneficiaries of Toyota’s woes. But until they break out those fleet sales, we can never be sure.

While Toyota has their feet dragged across hot coals in the United States, elsewhere around the world, Toyota’s problems aren’t as bad as they seem. In Australia and Canada, Toyota’s sales have reached record highs. In the UK, Toyota’ sales fell only 5 percent. Which isn’t bad, when you consider that Toyota doesn’t really have a loyal fanbase here, and what is here is fickle and prone to abandon their prior purchase in a heartbeat. Couple this with the facts that Toyota’s incentives were low (in comparison to the competition) for February 2010 and that they plan to ratchet them up for the following months, and you have an interesting next few months ahead. Is it time to start up a “Toyota Deathwatch”? Not yet, let’s see how the next few months go.

Cammy Corrigan
Cammy Corrigan

More by Cammy Corrigan

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 18 comments
  • Frozenman Frozenman on Mar 07, 2010

    I like to think of myself as a reasonably prudent investor, two weeks ago I took a pass on the new toyota and joined the subaru club instead. For me it's all about the resale and ease of moving on to the next new car when the time comes. If people actually call you when you place your ad for the used whip this can be a good thing.

  • Joe_Gamer Joe_Gamer on Mar 08, 2010

    I own a 2004 Honda Accord, I really love this car(V6 6SPD coupe) but I cannot honestly say that it is reliable or particularly well built. Honda is coasting on their Rep just like Toyota was, got the Accord out after the winter snow and surprise none of my dash lights work anymore, Brakes are made of mush and the front rotors warp so quickly it's insane. Interior is cheap, ABS/TCS control module failed and I'm not forking out $1400 to replace it. Third gear syncros for the 6spd transmission were uh subject of a "Technical Bulletin" which is like a recall that you get to pay for? Anyway(disclaimer: I am not really sure how the process works since I have had no problem with mine, but that is the impression I got from others). Now part of the "Honda Factory Performance" bodykit is falling off(cold broke down the adhesive I think, probably not entirely their fault). Had 76k When I bought it and it is now at 110k. My experience has not been one of reliability, gorgeous looks: yes, decent gas mileage: yes, performance that's fun yet not stupid enough to get in trouble with: yes, Reliable and well built: that's a negative. I expect much better reliability will come from companies like(IMHO) Hyundai, Subaru, or Ford who are still in the process of building a reputation for reliability and have not reached the point of critical mass where actual reliability is subjugated by clever marketing and a reputation that is no longer deserved.

  • 28-Cars-Later 2018 Toyota Auris: Pads front and back, K&N air filter and four tires @ 30K, US made Goodyears already seem inferior to JDM spec tires it came with. 36K on the clock.2004 Volvo C70: Somewhere between $6,5 to $8 in it all told, car was $3500 but with a wrecked fender, damaged hood, cracked glass headlight, and broken power window motor. Headlight was $80 from a yard, we bought a $100 door literally for the power window assembly, bodywork with fender was roughly a grand, brakes/pads, timing belt/coolant and pre-inspection was a grand. Roof later broke, parts/labor after two repair trips was probably about $1200-1500 my cost. Four 16in Cooper tires $62 apiece in 2022 from Wal Mart of all places, battery in 2021 $200, 6qts tranny fluid @ 20 is $120, maybe $200 in labor last year for tranny fluid change, oil change, and tire install. Car otherwise perfect, 43K on the clock found at 38.5K.1993 Volvo 244: Battery $65, four 15in Cooper tires @ $55 apiece, 4 alum 940 wheels @ roughly $45 apiece with shipping. Fixes for random leaks in power steering and fuel lines, don't remember. Needs rear door and further body work, rear door from yard in Gettysburg was $250 in 2022 (runs and drives fine, looks OK, I'm just a perfectionist). TMU, driven maybe 500 miles since re-acquisition in 2021.
  • 1995 SC I never hated these. Typical GM though. They put the wrong engine in it to start with, fixed it, and then killed it. I say that as a big fan of the aluminum 5.3, but for how they were marketing this it should have gotten the Corvette Motor at the start. Would be a nice cruiser though even with the little motor. The 5.3 without the convertible in a package meant to be used as a truck would have been great in my mind, but I suspect they'd have sold about 7 of them.
  • Rochester I'd rather have a slow-as-mud Plymouth Prowler than this thing. At least the Prowler looked cool.
  • Kcflyer Don't understand the appeal of this engine combo at all.
  • Dave M. This and the HHR were GM's "retro" failures. Not sure what they were smoking....
Next