By on March 18, 2010

Let’s face it: it’s not the best time to be launching any new automotive brand just now, let alone a brand built in Formula 1 and offering only a single, $250,000 product. Throughout the industry, OEMs are abandoning or distancing themselves from motorsport, as the old “win on Sunday, sell on Monday” logic proves to be an ever-fading anachronism. And yet here is McLaren Automotive, launching its first new road-going supercar in over ten years, with the the help of two F1 champs. Can an automotive brand survive selling high-priced symbols of racing prowess, at a time when racing (particularly Formula 1 racing) is becoming ever-more divorced from road car realities? More importantly, can it take on the lions of the supercar world with mere techno-wonkery?

McLaren says there’s room for it to flourish in what it calls the “core market” for sportscars costing between $200k and $260k. Marketing boss Antony Sheriff explains:

By the time the 12C is launched in 2011 we expect the economic conditions to be much improved. We have already seen significant interest in the car and the supply of the 12C will be relatively scarce; in its first year we plan to produce just 1,000 cars which represents only 3.5 percent of the ‘core’ market,

McLaren is keen to point out that “the ‘core’ segment’s growth from 8,000 sales in 2000 to more than 28,000 in 2007 highlights the potential that exists.” This assumes not only that economic growth will return, but that the growth in supercar sales comes from the kind of buyers who understand the McLaren brand and want what the MP4-12C has to offer.

Which is not to say that the new McLaren won’t be a stunning car to drive. From its low-weight emphasis, to its bespoke 600+ hp twin-turbocharged V8, there’s a lot to suggest that the MP4-12C has what it takes to tackle the best supercars on the market on the track. But when you get away from the pointy-headed men who read telemetry for fun and who appreciate the 4 kilo weight savings gained by using hexagonal aluminum conductors instead of circular circular wires, you realize that it takes a lot more than world-class, race-honed engineering to sell $250k cars.

Do any of the MP4-12C’s myriad tricks and features make up for the fact that it has a misshapen blob on it where the prancing horse or raging bull should be? Sure, there are plenty of hard-core enthusiasts who remember when the McLaren F1 was the world’s most all-conquering vehicle, but that was one car. And a neo-F1, the MP4-12C is not.

Besides technology, McLaren brought another important sensibility to the MP4-12C: subtlety. Chief designer Frank Stephenson explains:

Many sports cars and super cars present an ‘in-your-face’, ‘look-at-me’ image that can become wearing and boorish; the ultimate backhanded compliment becomes, “…it was of its time”. Great design, however, is timeless and looks relevant years later. With the 12C we have produced a car that looks great today and will still look great in years to come.

And yet isn’t the “in-your-face,” “look-at-me” image what actually sells supercars in the numbers that McLaren is justifying its business on? A subtle, sophisticated $250,000 car that believes that it’s what’s inside that counts sounds great on paper, but there’s very little to indicate that the supercar market has anything to do with vehicle capability. Status and emotion part men from their money far more effectively than infinitely-variable chassis roll control systems. Besides, the Audi R8 is a subtle-yet-desirable, mid-engined supercar and it costs less than half what the MP4-12C will. In comparison, the Macca seems derivative, anodyne and unnecessarily over-engineered.

None of this should take away from the remarkable achievements that the new McLaren represents. Pushing the technical limits of automotive possibility always produces exciting results, and if the MP4-12C can humiliate Ferrari’s 458 on the right tracks with the right publicity, the McLaren brand could become the new standard-bearer for British race-nutter sportscars. But will it grace the bedroom walls of young boys with its aspirational pornography? Will it pass into the vernacular as a one-word code for a more sophisticated approach to the look-at-me image? Will it stand out in Dubai, Davos or Pudong? If not, McLaren fans could just be waiting another ten years for another road car to emerge from Woking.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

3 Comments on “McLaren Automotive: Racing Is Easy, Selling Cars Is Hard...”

  • avatar

    “Many sports cars and super cars present an ‘in-your-face’, ‘look-at-me’ image that can become wearing and boorish; the ultimate backhanded compliment becomes, “…it was of its time”. Great design, however, is timeless and looks relevant years later. With the 12C we have produced a car that looks great today and will still look great in years to come.”

    Translates as:”It’s a visual snorefest, we know it, and we’re stuck with it…”

    What becomes ‘wearing’ and ‘boorish’ is those who piss off the roof and get angry that we don’t believe it’s rain.

    A Lambo Muira was in your face the day it came out. Still looks pretty sexy to me.

    A Jensen Interceptor was, well, just kinda frumpy from the first to hit the road. 30 years haven’t made it any better.

    If by ‘great design’ McLaren means ‘forgotten the second you look away’ then they have succeeded.

  • avatar

    I do wish the design had been stunningly, timelessly beautiful, but I know I would buy this car based on the performance…if I won the lottery.

  • avatar

    The really chose the wrong people to launch the car…where were the women?!

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: New or Used : Tastes Of The Weird

    daviel - I saw a Mazda2 on my bike ride today. Nice looking.
  • Re: New or Used : Tastes Of The Weird

    golden2husky - …..I’m not an idiot but out where I live there are plenty of wide open corners that are fun to get a little sideways on in the snow-but I don’t do it...
  • Re: New York 2014: 2015 Ford Focus Sedan Unveiled

    Zekele Ibo - Whether the 6-speed is better than the 5-speed depends on the ratios. It may be like the Honda Fit reviewed here a few days ago, where 6th was...
  • Re: New York 2014: 2015 MINI Countryman Debuted

    Onus - Is the badge that important. In this case its little more than a piece of freaking plastic! I need to get a hold of this wonderful plastic it sure did a...
  • Re: New York 2014: 2015 Volkswagen Jetta Live Shots

    walker42 - The front still has that eastern European look and the instrument panel looks like a minor refresh of the Jetta IV. That was 15 years ago.
  • Re: New or Used : Tastes Of The Weird

    wmba - Nor an early to mid eighties Audi. VW were still grappling with the mysteries of the electric motor on the customer’s R&D time and money. Their fuse...
  • Re: New or Used : Tastes Of The Weird

    golden2husky - Depending on the car, watch for the clockspring when you remove the motor….you could be rendered sterile if the regulator is lying on a bench when...
  • Re: New or Used : Tastes Of The Weird

    golden2husky - W body windows get real slow in the cold, but I’ve never had one fail totally. Right rear in my Sable broke closed, but considering it died at 21...
  • Re: New York 2014: 25 Years Of Miatas

    snakebit - Pretty much the landmark for an affordable sports car. I don’t know who to thank more, Bob Hall, Mr Matano, and the others who pitched the Miata concept...
  • Re: New or Used : Tastes Of The Weird

    Zekele Ibo - Got my Mazda2 base-model with A/C last year for $15k CAD including the usurious Quebec sales taxes. I’ve got to agree, it’s the best cheap manual...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote


  • Authors

  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • J & J Sutherland, Canada
  • Tycho de Feyter, China
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Faisal Ali Khan, India