By on March 18, 2010

Let’s face it: it’s not the best time to be launching any new automotive brand just now, let alone a brand built in Formula 1 and offering only a single, $250,000 product. Throughout the industry, OEMs are abandoning or distancing themselves from motorsport, as the old “win on Sunday, sell on Monday” logic proves to be an ever-fading anachronism. And yet here is McLaren Automotive, launching its first new road-going supercar in over ten years, with the the help of two F1 champs. Can an automotive brand survive selling high-priced symbols of racing prowess, at a time when racing (particularly Formula 1 racing) is becoming ever-more divorced from road car realities? More importantly, can it take on the lions of the supercar world with mere techno-wonkery?

McLaren says there’s room for it to flourish in what it calls the “core market” for sportscars costing between $200k and $260k. Marketing boss Antony Sheriff explains:

By the time the 12C is launched in 2011 we expect the economic conditions to be much improved. We have already seen significant interest in the car and the supply of the 12C will be relatively scarce; in its first year we plan to produce just 1,000 cars which represents only 3.5 percent of the ‘core’ market,

McLaren is keen to point out that “the ‘core’ segment’s growth from 8,000 sales in 2000 to more than 28,000 in 2007 highlights the potential that exists.” This assumes not only that economic growth will return, but that the growth in supercar sales comes from the kind of buyers who understand the McLaren brand and want what the MP4-12C has to offer.

Which is not to say that the new McLaren won’t be a stunning car to drive. From its low-weight emphasis, to its bespoke 600+ hp twin-turbocharged V8, there’s a lot to suggest that the MP4-12C has what it takes to tackle the best supercars on the market on the track. But when you get away from the pointy-headed men who read telemetry for fun and who appreciate the 4 kilo weight savings gained by using hexagonal aluminum conductors instead of circular circular wires, you realize that it takes a lot more than world-class, race-honed engineering to sell $250k cars.

Do any of the MP4-12C’s myriad tricks and features make up for the fact that it has a misshapen blob on it where the prancing horse or raging bull should be? Sure, there are plenty of hard-core enthusiasts who remember when the McLaren F1 was the world’s most all-conquering vehicle, but that was one car. And a neo-F1, the MP4-12C is not.

Besides technology, McLaren brought another important sensibility to the MP4-12C: subtlety. Chief designer Frank Stephenson explains:

Many sports cars and super cars present an ‘in-your-face’, ‘look-at-me’ image that can become wearing and boorish; the ultimate backhanded compliment becomes, “…it was of its time”. Great design, however, is timeless and looks relevant years later. With the 12C we have produced a car that looks great today and will still look great in years to come.

And yet isn’t the “in-your-face,” “look-at-me” image what actually sells supercars in the numbers that McLaren is justifying its business on? A subtle, sophisticated $250,000 car that believes that it’s what’s inside that counts sounds great on paper, but there’s very little to indicate that the supercar market has anything to do with vehicle capability. Status and emotion part men from their money far more effectively than infinitely-variable chassis roll control systems. Besides, the Audi R8 is a subtle-yet-desirable, mid-engined supercar and it costs less than half what the MP4-12C will. In comparison, the Macca seems derivative, anodyne and unnecessarily over-engineered.

None of this should take away from the remarkable achievements that the new McLaren represents. Pushing the technical limits of automotive possibility always produces exciting results, and if the MP4-12C can humiliate Ferrari’s 458 on the right tracks with the right publicity, the McLaren brand could become the new standard-bearer for British race-nutter sportscars. But will it grace the bedroom walls of young boys with its aspirational pornography? Will it pass into the vernacular as a one-word code for a more sophisticated approach to the look-at-me image? Will it stand out in Dubai, Davos or Pudong? If not, McLaren fans could just be waiting another ten years for another road car to emerge from Woking.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

3 Comments on “McLaren Automotive: Racing Is Easy, Selling Cars Is Hard...”


  • avatar
    porschespeed

    “Many sports cars and super cars present an ‘in-your-face’, ‘look-at-me’ image that can become wearing and boorish; the ultimate backhanded compliment becomes, “…it was of its time”. Great design, however, is timeless and looks relevant years later. With the 12C we have produced a car that looks great today and will still look great in years to come.”

    Translates as:”It’s a visual snorefest, we know it, and we’re stuck with it…”

    What becomes ‘wearing’ and ‘boorish’ is those who piss off the roof and get angry that we don’t believe it’s rain.

    A Lambo Muira was in your face the day it came out. Still looks pretty sexy to me.

    A Jensen Interceptor was, well, just kinda frumpy from the first to hit the road. 30 years haven’t made it any better.

    If by ‘great design’ McLaren means ‘forgotten the second you look away’ then they have succeeded.

  • avatar
    guyincognito

    I do wish the design had been stunningly, timelessly beautiful, but I know I would buy this car based on the performance…if I won the lottery.

  • avatar
    Orian

    The really chose the wrong people to launch the car…where were the women?!


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Re: Reader Review: 2013 BMW 128i M-Sport

    baconator - Yup, truly the last of a breed with the NA inline-6. Enjoy the car!
  • Re: Reader Review: 2013 BMW 128i M-Sport

    JimZ - if kids are something which happen “before you know it” you probably shouldn’t have slept through health class.
  • Re: Ramcharger Rebirth

    JimZ - “Where are the gas powered tractors hauling 100k lbs down the highway” Right here, jackwagon: http://www.freep.com/story/mon ey/cars/chrysler/2015/12/04...
  • Re: Ramcharger Rebirth

    krhodes1 - Slow and steady. Sucked a lot of gas too. But you’d get to the top of the hill eventually. I agree, we are unbelievably spoiled for vehicle performance in the US. I...
  • Re: Ramcharger Rebirth

    krhodes1 - Always an interesting argument, gas vs. diesel. I think a better way is comparing engines of comparable torque output. Say a 500lb-ft gas engine to a 500lb-ft diesel. The gas...
  • Re: Reader Review: 2013 BMW 128i M-Sport

    415s30 - Well the German SUVs are pretty bad and definitely stock. The damn tail lights are bright too, on a foggy SF morning heading into the city the massive lights...
  • Re: Reader Review: 2013 BMW 128i M-Sport

    415s30 - Uh whatever those huge Audi SUVs are sporting pretty much blind me, I am all for making that crap illegal. The lead up to the Golden Gate Bridge in the...
  • Re: Inside Stories From the War Between Automakers And Dealers Over Exports

    krhodes1 - Between personal exemption and deductions you (and I) pay nothing at all on a BIG chunk of income (assuming you own real...
  • Re: Inside Stories From the War Between Automakers And Dealers Over Exports

    jthorner - It is well established law that once a person buys a product they are free to resell it when and where they like....
  • Re: 2016 Ford Escape SE AWD Rental Review

    Japanese Buick - Count me among the AUX jack enthusiasts. It’s good to have available for when the Bluetooth glitches out and the phone and car blame each other...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributing Writers

  • Bark M., United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Vojta Dobes, Czech Republic

Get No-holds-barred, take-no-prisoners Automotive News in your Facebook Feed!

Already Liked