By on March 29, 2010

Last week, we shared with you an ingenious method of the U.S. Department of Justice to contribute to the deficit-afflicted holdings of the U.S. Treasury. The method involves shaking down foreign companies who grease the wheels to get deals in even more foreign lands. Or who even think about greasing the wheels. Caught between European laws and U.S. laws, these companies pay and promise to sin no more.

Last week, Germany’s Daimler agreed to pay $185m to settle charges brought by the U.S. Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Financial Times went through the proceedings and found out that the lawyers at the D.O.J. devised a clever method that turns a European rule into a steady stream of cash for the U.S. government. Writes the FT:

“A close look at hundreds of pages of court records show that the maker of Mercedes-Benz was never formally charged with paying bribes, though two of its subsidiaries were.”

“Instead, it was charged with conspiracy to commit bribery – an allegation that is usually reserved for defendants who plan, but do not execute, crimes – and a violation of “books and records provisions” of a US anti-bribery law.”

“Having entered into a “deferred prosecution agreement”, Daimler did not plead guilty to any charges, including the lesser conspiracy charge.”

This may sound like a technicality only lawyers can get excited about. However, the generous payment got Daimler off the hook with the European Union. EU rules forbid any company from receiving an EU contract if it has been found guilty or convicted of bribery.

This wouldn’t just have removed Mercedes Benz cars from European motorcades. Daimler is a major shareholder of EADS, a company that dabbles in such gadgetry as the Airbus, the Ariane rocket, the Eurocopter, the Eurofighter, and other expensive toys.

The mere idea of losing that business turns European companies into putty in the hands of D.O.J lawyers. And the money is rolling in:

Just last month, BAE Systems, the British defense group, paid $400m in fines to the DoJ. Again, BAE was not charged with bribery. They pleaded guilty to allegations of making false statements about their anti-bribery compliance program.

Likewise, the DoJ’s case against Siemens in 2008, that brought in $800m in penalties, hinged on “books and records” violations.

Even if the D.O.J. lack evidence of criminal intent, even if a pay-off is considered, but never committed, these “books and records” violations can turn into a goldmine. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) contains a “books and records provision” that requires companies to record “facilitation payments” on their books. Companies often find themselves in the position of being obliged by U.S. law to keep accurate accounts of something that is illegal in their home country. In other words: Avoidance of self-incrimination is a crime. However, these books and records boo-boos don’t count as bribery in the EU. Says the FT:

“Companies with deep pockets can afford steep penalties. But the severe consequences they face in Europe and sometimes the US if they are found guilty of actual bribery might be insurmountable, giving the DoJ a strong hand in negotiations.”

D.O.J. lawyers never explicitly threaten that companies should settle for lesser allegations in order to avoid bribery charges. Company attorneys quickly make that suggestion and work out a deal.

And how do the D.O.J. and the S.E.C. get jurisdiction? Not via U.S. shell companies, or U.S. accounts, as it has been surmised. The Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung lifted that secret: If your stock is listed at a U.S. stock exchange, then they’ve got you.

The practice not only turned into a steady stream of income for the U.S. Treasury. It spawned a whole industry of corporate compliance consultants, that teach lax European corporations to stay clear of the long arm and the greedy hands of the U.S. law.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

7 Comments on “How To Make Hundreds Of Millions Without Even Trying...”


  • avatar
    superbadd75

    Wow, how much more out of control can this government get? Actually, that could prove to be a very dumb question. This is just amazing, and scary. Evidently the U.S. Government doesn’t care who we piss off.

  • avatar
    ClutchCarGo

    Oh, please. $1.5B in fines is a goldmine? That’s lightbulb money for the fed govt. However misguided you might think the DoJ is in pursuing these matters, revenue generation would be way down the list of motives.

  • avatar
    Juniper

    SOP http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100329/ap_on_bi_ge/as_china_rio_tinto_trial;_ylt=Au5b0aTHB7DSt5Tg5BOVHKqyBhIF;_ylu=X3oDMTJ0a3AwcG5jBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAwMzI5L2FzX2NoaW5hX3Jpb190aW50b190cmlhbARwb3MDNgRzZWMDeW5fYXJ0aWNsZV9zdW1tYXJ5X2xpc3QEc2xrA2NoaW5hc2xhcHNyaQ–

  • avatar

    How about what China metes out when officials TAKE bribes:

    http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90776/90882/6394664.html

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/oilandgas/5834749/Sinopec-chairman-gets-suspended-death-sentence-for-bribery.html

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article1854680.ece

    • 0 avatar
      Lumbergh21

      I found the following statement in the first link above to be interesting,

      “Also under the ruling, Chen was stripped of his political rights for life”

      In China, your life is a political right. Not surprising, but sad none the less.

    • 0 avatar
      OldandSlow

      Thanks for reminding all of us outside of the Middle Kingdom what the maximum penalty is for taking bribes.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributors

  • Matthew Guy, Canada
  • Seth Parks, United States
  • Ronnie Schreiber, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States
  • Moderators

  • Adam Tonge, United States
  • Kyree Williams, United States