By on March 16, 2010

From Jim Sikes (he only wants a new car), and Orange County ( no idea what they really want), to class action lawyers (they want billions), everybody wants to cash in on Toyota. Chinese Zhejiang Province’s doesn’t want to stand behind. Their commerce bureau and consumer protection committee called on Toyota to compensate drivers for costs stemming from its recall of faulty vehicles, reports The Nikkei [sub]. Compared to what others want, the folks in Zhejiang are frugal.

They want a quick response and a timetable for completion of the recall. In China, the recall covers about 75,000 RAV4 sport utility vehicles made in 2009-10, no word on how many are in Zhejiang . The bureau also demands that Toyota supplies loaner cars while the RAV4 is in the shop. Furthermore, Toyota should compensate drivers for gasoline and other expenses involved in bringing cars back to dealerships. After all, Toyota is generous with spiffs in the U.S.A., and please don’t discriminate against us poor Chinese.

Toyota’s rsponse? Toyota China says the fix takes just 30 minutes, the customer can wait, and there is no need for a loaner. Toyota also does not reimburse costs involved in returning the vehicle, even in the U.S., they say. Now if the Chinese ask for gas money, how long will that take to catch on over here?

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

No Comments on “China Wants Alms From Toyota...”

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: Toyota May Kill V6 Camry

    28-Cars-Later - 1. $10K+ premium for a Lex V6? No thanks. 2. Gives Toyota dealers a compelling loaded product at a lower price point than Avalon and allows them to compete with...
  • Re: EPA Mandates Real-World Testing For All Automakers

    SCE to AUX - “EPA Mandates Real-World Testing For All Automakers” Good. Then the Optima Hybrid could be rated higher than today’s...
  • Re: Don’t Drink the Google Kool-aid: Autonomy’s Limits in Three Sips

    Vulpine - Mr. Smitka offers some very valid points, but his article is launched off of a poor premise. I, for one, don’t...
  • Re: Piston Slap: The Express’ New Mission?

    rpol35 - Ouch! That’s a heck of a very pertinent story, you even got the Panther reference included – what a bad break.
  • Re: 2015 Opel Corsa Revealed

    geozinger - “No, what I see here is brand hate over product news.” Nothing new here folks. I’ve been following this site for years and if you can’t say...
  • Re: Junkyard Find: 1986 Buick Somerset

    sirwired - Well, clearly I know nothing about design, because I think for an ’86 car, that “pod” radio control looks pretty neat. Could use some large...
  • Re: Cadillac ATS-V Coupe Spotted At The Ring

    SomeGuy - You mean LT4 right? Either way, whatever engine they put in there will be vastly more reliable than a BMW motor (which is their competitor).
  • Re: Toyota May Kill V6 Camry

    Lie2me - Were they new or just a cumulative total, they’ve been around a few years. I live 4 blocks from a Ford/Lincoln dealer and I can’t remember the last time I saw...
  • Re: Toyota May Kill V6 Camry

    VoGo - I think Toyota originally put a V6 into the Camry because they enlarged the Camry with every generation, to the point that the I-4 was under-powered. But in the last...
  • Re: Junkyard Find: 1986 Buick Somerset

    Tim_Turbo - Don’t forget about the unicorn of the bunch-Olds Cutlass Calais 442. 180hp, 5 speed manual. Somewhere I read that not very many were made, but I can...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Authors

  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • Tycho de Feyter, China
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Faisal Ali Khan, India