Project Better Place Birthwatch: Visiting Hours

Tal Bronfer
by Tal Bronfer

Optimism and food were the two abundant commodities at Better Place’s press conference yesterday morning, announcing the company’s first Visitor Center, established – how ironically – inside what used to be an oil tank in Pi Glilot, a former gas depot. It seems that the entire event and the resounding optimism around it were eclipsed by HSBC’s recent $350 million investment in the company.

Better Place’s new visitor center is the company’s first ever direct appeal to customers in marketing the car. Rather than educate visitors about the company, the center seems focuses on educating the public on the idea of electric cars themselves. Movies, interactive displays and galleries are all included – but so is a ‘live’ demonstration: genuine electric cars powered by Better Place’s solution that users can test drive themselves on a short course.

Perhaps one of the boldest messages the company tried to convey during the press conference was branding. The thousands of logos spread across the visitor center betray CEO Shai Agassi’s goal of making Better Place’s ‘switch’ symbol as recognizable as Apple’s logo within “three to four years.” Agassi said that Renault’s investment in a ‘ground breaking’ project such as Better Place is reminiscent of the step that Apple has taken with the iPod and iPhone.

Symbolically, the establishment of the visitor center also brings the company to committing to a schedule. The initial real-world Israeli pilot rollout of the Renault Fluence Z.E sedan, featuring a few hundred cars given out mainly to leasing customers, will take place around September this year, says Agassi. Series production of the Fluence in Renault’s Turkish factory will begin halfway through 2011, with the first ‘regular’ cars destined to arrive on Israeli roads in the end of 2011.

Critically, Agassi refused to reveal the electric Fluence’s local pricing, but previous reports and speculations place the showroom price at around 85,000 NIS, about $23,000 and more than $9,000 cheaper than Israel’s bestselling car, the Mazda3. Being a showroom price tag, it doesn’t include the battery, which will be subsidized by Better Place and paid for on a monthly basis with payments depending on range travelled.

The press conference also gave interesting insight into Better Place’s intentions regarding the battery switching stations and the related infrastructure, something that company officials weren’t too keen to discuss previously. The battery switching stations will theoretically provide Better Place’s vehicles unlimited range, with a freshly charged battery replacing an incoming car’s used battery, but it’s not clear if Better Place will modify the Fluence Z.E sedan – which has batteries mounted in the trunk – to suit its battery swapping model.

Kaplinsky revealed that the company has signed a surprising agreement with Israeli gas station operator Dor Alon to deploy battery switching

spots in its stations, while hinting at similar agreements to be signed with additional partners in the near future. 5 to 10 battery replacement stations are scheduled to be installed in Israel for 2010, and until the end of 2011 the company guarantees 100 battery swap spots – most of which will be installed in partnering gas stations.

Kaplinsky spoke of the 92 ‘Better Place Vision Partners’, including newly-joined Motorola, Computer Associates, Strauss and Israeli ISP Netvision. In total, these companies account for a fleet spanning 45,000 vehicles – more than a third of Israeli car sales in 2009. Numbers weren’t provided, but Better Place Israel’s CEO said that a ‘portion’ of the fleet will be dedicated to electric vehicles utilizing the company’s solution. He also presented a list of 17 municipalities cooperating with Better Place – likely in setting up charging stations – amongst of which are Jerusalem and Haifa.

The company introduced a new pilot in Tokyo, where 4 Better Place taxis (likely converted Nissan Rogues) will operate over the course of the next year, each travelling a distance of about 18,500 miles. Agassi says the pilot will help prove the long-term viability of Better Place’s batteries and swap stations.

Better Place’s execs also spoke of the company’s plans for the future. Idan Ofer, Chairman of the Board, mentioned that the company is in contact with Chinese automaker Chery to produce battery-replaceable EVs. During the Q&A session, Agassi stated that the company is in talks with ‘many different automakers’ regarding the utilization of its solution in more vehicles, and explained that the recent financial crisis slowed down the negotiations. He also said that Renault is developing nine different electric vehicles for different segments and tastes, and while refusing to elaborate, hinted at an upcoming sports car: ‘not all of those cars will force you to be green’, he stated.

Discussing the battery range issue, Agassi spoke of a total range of 620,000 miles before a battery is required to be replaced, and of three ‘range cycles’ that would decrease travel range per charge during use. To us, that sounds like sugar coating a battery’s natural tendency to decrease its capacity over time, as well as a rather optimistic battery life span.

The issue of standardization also appeared during the session, with Agassi declaring that Better Place will cooperate with competing companies providing similar service. He even went as far as claiming that such companies are beneficial for the project.

The ambitious center and newly-found willingness to share numbers may bring Better Place one iota closer to their dream of a network of electric vehicles, but the fundamental questions around the viability of the project are still afloat.

One shadowed area is how much range is affected by one’s driving habits and requirements; another is the issue of battery fatigue – which wasn’t fully addressed during the event. We will be exploring these issues during the Better Place Birthwatch series, but meanwhile, we’ll close with an interesting fact: while the fleet of electric Renaults caught sun outside, Mr. Ofer, who is renowned for owning a Tesla Roadster, parked his other car, an Audi RS6, at the curb. Sheer hypocrisy or subtle taste in cynical jokes? You decide.

Tal Bronfer
Tal Bronfer

More by Tal Bronfer

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 14 comments
  • Mor2bz Mor2bz on Feb 10, 2010

    Martin: I am fully aware of people's propensity to use what power is available in a car, be is ICE or electric. Tesla CEO was always asking a prospective customer to adjust the radio. As the passenger reached for the radio, the driver would floor the accelerator, and the resulting g force would make it impossible for the passenger to reach forward. Range does not have to decrease with a bigger motor, but given how people are going to drive a "hot" car, that's how it is going to work out. Your comments aobut weight (and I will add aerodynamics) are duly noted. But putting a bigger motor in then what is needed (Tesla) with a higher amp draw is not going to enhance range. There is only a finite amount of power in the battery. I apologize for my bad tone, but I stand on my remarks.

  • Blowfish Blowfish on Feb 10, 2010

    Coal fired Gen plant, so the emission just went elsewhere. Are Coal fired gen emits less pollution than most cars as Gram per grams? I can see it can get ahead of the game if it were Hydro or wind mill generated power to run these all EVs.

    • Nonce Nonce on Feb 10, 2010

      It's not just the emissions. It allows them to not use oil, which lowers the overall price, which means that countries like Iran have less dollars to buy suicide bombers against Israel. Israel alone shifting away from oil and towards coal/nuclear/hydro/wind won't break the price of oil, but if it can help that happen, it increases the lifespan of its citizens.

  • Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
Next