[Update 3: This post is now officially obsolete, having been supplanted by the much more accurate update here]
[Update 2: In a new post, I have noted that 53% of Toyota UA complaints were filed after the mat advisory was issued on 9/29/09. The number used her are not adjusted for that. As soon as they are available, I will redo this spreadsheet, using more accurate sales stats]
[Update ans Disclaimer: As I noted below, this spreadsheet will be updated when I can access actual sales stats from our source, Morgan and Co. on Monday for the years ('05-'10) covered. That will very likely change the rankings somewhat. The Lincoln may actually be #2. But this is not about which car is #1 or #2; it's about finding patterns in certain makes, and within makes. It's an attempt to see if these statistics can shed light on a complex and opaque issue. As an example, why the Toyota Yaris is so low in reported incidents. It's more about these patterns and discrepancies, than about singling out the car with the highest rate, so please don't take the current exact rankings as the final word. It's a work in progress. The fact that the complaints are not tabulated by individual MY also limits this substantially, as running changes in a given car during the five year period will change things significantly. So this data dive is fundamentally flawed; take it as such. But nevertheless, it's still a huge step over the raw data that Edmunds put out, which doesn't begin to account for the number of any given cars sold.]
Numbers and statistics are largely useless without context. Edmunds.com took a first good step in going through NHTSA’s data base and reporting the number of UA events reported per make, brand and vehicle. But what was obviously missing was the correlation to the number of cars on the road in relation to those numbers. We’ve taken the next (tedious) step, and the results are most interesting indeed. They’re certainly not completely conclusive, but we’re not finished yet. The full list of 95 cars follows, as well as our methodology, a stab at some analysis, and more questions to still be answered. (Read More…)











Recent Comments
DC Bruce - My suggestion: delete the manual from your wish list. That opens up a lot more opportunities, even among the vehicles suggested. My second suggestion:...
aristurtle - Fast charging is an important feature for the “range anxiety” people even if you only use it rarely and ordinarily do an...
ciddyguy - Wow, still see old Subies here in the Puget Sound area. In recent years, I’ve spotted several really old Subies, like someone may still...
Zackman - I have NEVER bought a car for speed. I buy for what appeals to me – and is economical. Why do you think I own a 2004 Impala 3.4L? I cruise easily during my...
FJ60LandCruiser - At 6’3” and 190 pounds I can’t fit in the Miata. Everything is too small, it’s like I time traveled back to when 5 feet was the average...
Wheatridger - Speed is unimportant? What a shameful, blasphemous heresy to post on a car blog! I agree completely.
roger628 - Appears to be an Isuzu Trooper with a piece of bumper or something laying on top of IT’S bumper. Threw me for a loop too initially.
tonyola - How about a second-series (1997-2001) Jeep Cherokee? Sturdy, tidy size, available with manual, room for the dogs, cheap and easy to fix if something...
DC Bruce - Yup. What he said! Nice photos by the way. My rough rule of thumb is for a general-purpose passenger car, hitting 60 mph in between 6 and 7 seconds is plenty fast. And...
Some Guy - As much as I hate to say it, I would think that it’s no big deal to have one standard for cars sold in (not by) Japan and cars sold in...