Jeep Crossing Over To "Broaden Urban Appeal"

Cammy Corrigan
by Cammy Corrigan

Having re-birthed themselves at the taxpayers’ expense, one of Chrysler’s top priorities is restoring the brand equity that has bled out since the Daimler takeover. First up was the move to spin “Ram” off as its own brand, and now it seems that no-one is safe from “re-birth,” as UPI.com reports that Chrysler are rethinking their strongest brand, Jeep. Unfortunately, one man’s brand rebirth is another man’s brand betrayal. Chrysler want to replace all of Jeep’s products, except for the Wrangler and Grand Cherokee, and the idea is to utilise Fiat’s experience of fuel efficient engines as the basis for it. That means Jeep is likely to become smaller, more fuel-efficient and less off-road capable [ rumors of a Fiat Panda 4×4-based Jeep (rendered above) date back to the earliest days of the Fiat-Chrysler alliance]. If you had to boil the proposed shift into a single word, UPI figures it would be “soft.” And the markets have reacted to this news in pretty much the same way you’ve probably just reacted: they think the idea is bad. Very bad.

“Chrysler has to protect the crown jewel,” Aaron Bragman, research analyst with IHS Global Insight, told the newspaper. “When Jeep sticks to its core values it does well. Jeep has always been a trucky off-road brand and whenever they got away from that it did not go well.” Gerald Myers, professor at the University of Michigan and former chairman of Jeep’s former owner, AMC, was a little less subdued in his reaction, “It’s a huge mistake….I couldn’t think of anything worse for the brand.” Mike Manley, head of the Jeep brand said that the brand is capable of broadening its urban appeal and is aware of the risks, “We don’t want to dilute what Jeep means,” he said. Which is probably what Cadillac brand managers said when they introduced the Cimmarron.

Cammy Corrigan
Cammy Corrigan

More by Cammy Corrigan

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 47 comments
  • Jaje Jaje on Feb 02, 2010

    Again - don't water down your brands' image / niche just to get a few more sales. Protect it, develop it, keep your hardcore customers and not focus on chasing the soccer mom / cubicle commuter Dads current vehicle fashion (it will change), weather the slow sales periods and wait for the booms when your image is again back in style with a stronger image. This is marketing 101 that the car companies simply fail at.

  • INeon INeon on Feb 02, 2010

    The Panda is not watered-down. It(from internet searches-- I'm plain old American) has a wonderful reputation for a minuscule 4x4. Top 10 in Top Gear's survey-- of over 150 automobiles. No other commuter-mileage car is as capable offroad as this Panda. It's been built for 30 years. In America, we call that legendary when it's attached to the Toyoda or Honda brands. Why the bias? The car gets 55mpg with the diesel and 4x4. You're welcome for the cake, and you may begin eating.

    • See 1 previous
    • Brad Kozak Brad Kozak on Feb 02, 2010

      I'm a Wrangler guy. (Used to say "I'm a Jeep guy," but that's like when you're a Conservative, you can't say "I'm a Republican," because "Republican" doesn't stand for anything any more than "Jeep" does.) The Panda may be a great vehicle. But until they deliver something that would look outta place under the Big Top with a bunch of Ringling Bros.' finest pouring out of it, I'll pass. My formula to "Save the Jeeps" is simple: Stop trying to make Jeep all things to all people. Focus, Pinky...FOCUS. Kill the Compass (please!), the Patriot, and the Commander. Return the Liberty to it's "Cute Ute" roots - and sell 'em to women. If you need a vehicle for hybrid/electric/alt. fuels/screwing up the brand - this is the one to sacrifice. Build a two-door and four-door pickup built on the Wrangler Unlimited base - hard top and soft-top, please. Put Diesels in the Wrangler! Hire an ad agency that understands the brand,(maybe people who drive Jeeps, for instance), stand back, and let them recapture the romance of the brand. (MY agency, for instance. Hint, hint; grin, grin; wink, wink; say no more, say no more.) That's about it. And if you wanna do something that would REALLY appeal to off-road guys, cut a deal with Herman Miller and license the Aeron chair technology, and make some seats for the Jeep that ditch cushions for a fabric/frame combo - then put them in a stripped-down Rubicon with no superfluous electronics (electric windows, power locks, etc.). Now THAT would sell.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
  • BrandX "I can charge using the 240V outlets, sure, but it’s slow."No it's not. That's what all home chargers use - 240V.
  • Jalop1991 does the odometer represent itself in an analog fashion? Will the numbers roll slowly and stop wherever, or do they just blink to the next number like any old boring modern car?
  • MaintenanceCosts E34 535i may be, for my money, the most desirable BMW ever built. (It's either it or the E34 M5.) Skeptical of these mods but they might be worth undoing.
  • Arthur Dailey What a load of cow patties from fat cat politicians, swilling at the trough of their rich backers. Business is all for `free markets` when it benefits them. But are very quick to hold their hands out for government tax credits, tax breaks or government contracts. And business executives are unwilling to limit their power over their workers. Business executives are trained to `divide and conquer` by pitting workers against each other for raises or promotions. As for the fat cat politicians what about legislating a living wage, so workers don't have to worry about holding down multiple jobs or begging for raises? And what about actually criminally charging those who hire people who are not legally illegible to work? Remember that it is business interests who regularly lobby for greater immigration. If you are a good and fair employer, your workers will never feel the need to speak to a union. And if you are not a good employer, then hopefully 'you get the union that you deserve'.
Next