Why I'll Never Buy A New Pickup Truck

Paul Niedermeyer
by Paul Niedermeyer

Pickup Truck def: a vehicle designed to haul cargo that the owner picks up and places into its cargo bed.

I may be in the minority, but that’s how I use my truck. I haul gravel, compost, dirt, and mulch, and shovel it out the back, which is the most efficient way to do it, short of a dump bed. I also haul junk to to the dump, and load loose items by tossing them over the side of my truck’s bed, and unload them the same way. I can readily lean over into my bed’s side and reach all the items in there. I easily tip large appliances single handedly into and out of the bed. That’s why I have a truck, and that’s what I expect it to be able to do. But there are times when I think I might like to ride in something a little more comfortable and safe than my 1966 Ford F-100. So I head down to my local Ford dealer and check out a new truck, starting with the business end:

There’s almost a foot of difference (10″ precisely) in the load height on any new Ford pickup from mine. Old Yellow’s tailgate sits 26″ from the ground; the F-150 is at 36″. That makes all the difference in the world for how I use my truck. I can’t even reach into the bed properly over the side of the 56″ tall F-150 bed. And shoveling in or out of the back of the bed would be an ergonomic nightmare even for a younger man than me.

I intended to drive around to the other truck dealers, but a cold downpour sent me scurrying home to check the stats on their web sites. Only Chevrolet and Toyota list their maximum load height (Silverado: 33.9″; Tundra: 35.4″). Endless specifications on every other possible dimension inside and out is on offer by the rest, but not the bed height? Hello! There are actually some folks who still lift things into and out of their beds.

I can tell by looking at them that the Dodge (oops, Ram) and Nissan Titan are no better. I guess it’s a sign of the times when a person has to use a ladder, a powered lift gate or hire a day laborer to just load or unload their truck. But in these times of renewed values of simplicity, an interest in urban farming, and just plain economical DIYing, it would seem that a simple full-sized-bed truck designed to have thing picked up and placed into its bed just might have some value again.

Paul Niedermeyer
Paul Niedermeyer

More by Paul Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 83 comments
  • Hebekiah Hebekiah on Aug 03, 2017

    So glad to find so many people who share my feelings about these giant useless trucks made to carry egos and no work. My '97 Mazda B2300 does heavy work every day and the bed is low enough to use as a giant toolbox while the rack carries my lumber and a trailer hauls gravel. So what if I go a bit slower pulling a ton? My ego isn't on the line.

  • Skippity Skippity on Jan 23, 2022

    12 years later it’s no better, if not worse. Many new trucks are brodozers that only need to haul an ego.

  • FreedMike Comparison: RAV4 versus CR-V. Who wins? Mazda CX-5 Turbo.(Sorry, the Toyota and Honda are both deadly dull to drive.)
  • Ajla 1. RAV4 Hybrid2. CRV Hybrid 3. RAV4 2.54. RAV4 Prime5. CRV 1.5T
  • MaintenanceCosts If only it had a hatch. The Model S is so much more practical, has similar performance in non-Plaid form, and is $20k more - and the $20k premium seems almost worth it just for the hatch.
  • Lorenzo I'm not surprised. They needed to drop the "four-door coupe", or as I call it, the Dove soap bar shape, and put a formal flat roof over the rear seats, to call it a sedan. The Legacy hasn't had decent back seat headroom since the 1990s, except for the wagons. Nobody wants to drive with granny in the front passenger seat!
  • Analoggrotto GM is probably reinventing it as their next electric.
Next