New York Governor Promotes Speed Cameras As Budget Fix

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

New York Governor David A. Patterson (D) is joining a number of other states in promoting the use of freeway speed cameras as a way to address his state’s massive $7.4 billion budget shortfall. Patterson’s budget proposal, released yesterday, includes a plan to deploy fifty photo radar vans to generate $96 million in net profit for the general fund by 2012.

“The mistakes of the past — squandering surpluses, papering over deficits, relying on irresponsible fiscal gimmicks to finance unsustainable spending increases — have led us to a financial breaking point,” Patterson wrote. “There are no more easy answers…. The only way we can emerge from this crisis is through shared sacrifice.”

Patterson’s budget describes the use of speed cameras on freeways as a “revenue action” that does not constitute a tax increase or a fee increase. His announcement came after that of California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) who earlier this month launched an initiative to use five-hundred cameras to issue tickets worth up to $325 each to generate $398 million in profit, not counting the money split with the private vendor that will run the program.

New York’s more modest plan involves issuing cheaper $50 tickets on the freeway and $100 tickets in so-called “work zones” where speed limits have been lowered. Forty of the cameras will be positioned in the pricier work zones — with no requirement that actual work be done in the zone — and ten cameras will be positioned on other high-volume highways. Patterson’s plan also includes a provision guaranteed to create a reduction in collision statistics following installation of the cameras.

“[The budget will] increase the Law Enforcement Motor Vehicle Accident Report threshold from $1000 to $3000 and eliminate the requirement that motorists also file accident reports,” Patterson’s proposal states.

With fewer reports, the new statistics will show fewer accidents in the “after” period, even if the actual number of collisions remains unchanged. This change and the speed camera program itself will require the approval of the New York State Assembly which approved a massive expansion of red light cameras in 2009.

[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 22 comments
  • BklynPete BklynPete on Jan 20, 2010

    You can't blame Patterson for giving his people a raise. After the "reputations" they've gained working for this stooge, what similar opportunities will come along?

  • Blaster66 Blaster66 on Jan 31, 2010

    There were radar vans in British Columbia Canada for a few years ('95-2000 as I recall). I came to the conclusion that they were useless at catching real speeders; they can only catch people going 10 over who are not paying attention. B.C. had a policy of putting them at specific, safe places on the shoulder. If you drove a route you soon knew where to slow down. The upside, if you wanted to speed, was that you could pretty well speed everywhere else-- since almost all the traffic cop resources were now tied down to radar vans. The downside was there was a lot less real traffic enforcement of plain bad driving.

Next