By on January 7, 2010

Keep digging! (courtesy:Miami.FlyMe/Flickr)

With the world starting to gain stability economically and economists talking about “bull markets” you’d be forgiven for thinking we can start to be optimistic and why not? Ford are flying high, GM (prodded by the government) are adding third shifts and Chrysler’s sales “only” dropped 3.7% in December. Well, don’t be too sure. CNN Money reports that a survey conducted by KPMG of 200 auto and supplier executive showed that 88% of them believe there is still too much capacity in North American plants. In fact, the survey showed that the executives believe that overcapacity is a bigger problem today than a year ago and when you look at the figures, it’s a bit of a no brainer.

Wards Automotive estimates that with all the plant closings in North America, capacity was cut by 1.5 million to 18 million. But in 2009, only 10.4 million cars were sold and forecasts only predict the level rising to 11.5 million for 2010. “Despite the fact we’ve taken out capacity, if volumes remain low we will continue to be in an overcapacity situation,” said Betsy Meter, the auto industry audit leader at KPMG. The survey also showed that the executives believe that there will be more mergers and consolidation which will force the plant closings which the industry needs. And if the mergers and consolidation don’t bring about the productions cuts, then the impending Indian and Chinese invasion will.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

6 Comments on “Industry Survey: US Not Out Of The Overcapacity Woods Yet...”

  • avatar

    Not surprising really. Given the new transplant factories, I suspect we still have NA capacity for 14 or 15M vehicles. And plan to sell 11M this year.

  • avatar

    Well, we can fix the impending Chinese and Indian car problem easily by banning them outright until US exported vehicles can be sold unrestricted in those countries.

  • avatar

    US overcapacity is about the size of GM and Chrysler. Coincidence?

    • 0 avatar

      Yeah, but some of that capacity would be acquired and used after a proper bankruptcy. A spin off such as “Silverado Motor Corporation” that focused on trucks & SUVs would do fine.
      Hell, Toyota might consider partial ownership. Think of the option choices. Imagine an IFORCE V8 Silverado or a small block Tundra… The capacity has to go somewhere…

  • avatar

    No way.  China will demand that we purchase their vehicles in exchange for their purchasing our debt.  There will be quotas.

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: QOTD: Could Tesla Still Go Under?

    SCE to AUX - Thank you. I had the same complaints earlier ^^^. Facts don’t matter to the detractors, who also like to mix in their disdain for govt subsidies and...
  • Re: QOTD: Could Tesla Still Go Under?

    Luke42 - I’ve never had much trouble opening hatchbacks in the snow. The sliding doors on my minivan can bu locked by ice, and sometimes I have to get in there and...
  • Re: QOTD: Could Tesla Still Go Under?

    SCE to AUX - Well, that was predictable. Tesla is now the EV sales leader in the US, with gas at $2.23 in my area. The only other cool-looking EVs coming soon are from...
  • Re: QOTD: Could Tesla Still Go Under?

    Vulpine - Too many mistakes in that article, as well as some plain old misinformation. Nearly every negative point the author makes was refuted by Musk himself at the...
  • Re: No Fixed Abode: The Last Days Of Bronco

    Drzhivago138 - It says a lot about the number of people who actually utilized the 1st gen’s removable top that it was discontinued for the 2nd gen.
  • Re: No Fixed Abode: The Last Days Of Bronco

    Ronnie Schreiber - “so many people on this board giddily tell us how they have no need for the lower classes” Sorry, but I’ve been reading TTAC...
  • Re: QOTD: Could Tesla Still Go Under?

    SCE to AUX - Gigafactory. If it doesn’t reduce battery costs sufficiently, Tesla either raises prices or they go out of business. If it does reduce battery prices...
  • Re: No Fixed Abode: The Last Days Of Bronco

    Ronnie Schreiber - The first generation Ramcharger in the ’70s had a removable top, just like the Bronco. That was a bit before Jack’s time at the Ford...
  • Re: QOTD: Could Tesla Still Go Under?

    SCE to AUX - That has nothing to do with the car. Critics pick on the car, when their real problem is with the GOVERNMENT’s subsidy policy, or Mr Musk’s...
  • Re: Lexus Adds 2-liter Turbo to 2016 RC Coupe, Which Now Offers Four Engines, I Guess

    fvfvsix - Comparably equipped, the 435i is $57,000 as opposed to the IS’s $49,500. I ran the numbers 5 months ago....

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote


  • Contributing Writers

  • Jack Baruth, United States
  • Bark M., United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Doug DeMuro, United States
  • Steven Lang, United States
  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Vojta Dobes, Czech Republic
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, United States
  • Cameron Aubernon, United States