Going Global, Ford Faces Uncertainty Down Under

Cammy Corrigan
by Cammy Corrigan

Despite his genial, affable manner, Alan Mulally is a businessman and, by all accounts, a businessman not to be crossed with. One story goes, when he first started with Ford, he let them know, in the clearest possible terms, “Everybody says you can’t make money off small cars,” he said. “Well, you’d better damn well figure out how to make money, because that’s where the world is going.” Long protected from the brutal rationalisation of the global market, Australia might be about to get a taste of the man’s darker side as he attempts to drag Ford’s Australian ops into the 21st Century.




The Australian
reports that the future of Ford’s Melbourne factory in Australia is undecided. The Ford Falcon’s current model will finish in five years’ time and there’s no cash on the horizon for retooling (unsurprisingly, considering its weak sales start). “We’re looking at a variety of things at the moment. What we build in Australia will evolve over the next 18 months to two years.” said Ford Australia Chief Executive, Marin Burela.

Alan “I’m Steve Jobs, mark 2.0” Mulally still hasn’t passed judgement on whether Ford will continue manufacture in the Land Down Under. The only thing he has confirmed was that developing a new Falcon, just for the Australian market, was no longer an option. “People who make one vehicle for one country — a different vehicle — those days are gone because you can’t compete with the global companies,” Mr Mulally said. “Around the world now, the things that are driving every purchase decision are quality, fuel efficiency, safety, smart design and the best value.” Seems like Mr Mulally is taking this “One Ford” policy very seriously.

There were plans to build the next Focus in Australia to replace the Falcon, but those plans have since been scrapped and Alan Mulally said there was no chance that decision would be reversed. Could there be a more sure sign that Ford do not wish to continue manufacture in Australia? Still, Mr Mulally didn’t want to alienate the Australian market so he trotted out the usual management speak in a situation like this, “Australia is a very important market for us and we’ve worked hard to be competitive,” he said. “No matter what, we’re going to serve the Australian market.” Which is great, but doesn’t help clarify the future of the Melbourne plant. In defence of Mr Mulally, Ford Australia built 55,000 cars last year, which is a small amount. Couple that with the fact that the United States and Australia have a free trade agreement between them, then suddenly, it’s easy to see where Alan Mulally is coming from.

Cammy Corrigan
Cammy Corrigan

More by Cammy Corrigan

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 51 comments
  • Mtymsi Mtymsi on Jan 12, 2010

    There are enough worldwide variations of the V8 RWD platform for Ford to justify the expense a developing a new one. As mentioned, 55k vehicles while not a large output is a sufficient output to justify an assembly plant. Between all the worldwide applications a V8 RWD platform could be used for and the 55k production I think Ford will continue to build Australian V8 RWD cars. Although a RWD V8 platform isn't global it is still volume wise a justifiable investment for Ford.

  • TonyJZX TonyJZX on Jan 12, 2010

    The Australian Government also gives money to Toyota. And they also used to give money to Mitsubishi but that wasn't enough. They too dissolved local production just like Nissan before them. There's gonna come a time where govt. money is just not enough and we're talking in the $15o mil. range here... not the billions the US gets. I personally think both Ford and Holden are safe. For the next 5-10yrs at least. However past then... it's inevitable. This is another scare rumour based on the words of one man... who really doesn't know what's happening in the next 6 months... 18 months... etc. We are dissecting his words to a degree that is probably corrupting his intent... if there ever was such an intent in the first place.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next