Ford Doubles Down On The World Car With 2012 Focus

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

When the Ford Focus first went on sale in the US, it was a rare glimpse for the still-SUV-centric US market at how the rest of the world gets from the Blue Oval. Of course, as time went by, Ford eased away from the Euro-funk of the first generation, first blandifying the model with a mid-cycle “refresh,” before eventually replacing it with the current embarrassment to the nameplate. And it’s not just the current model’s Mighty Morphin’ Power Rangers-meets-Pep Boys look that makes it unworthy of the Focus name: the whole idea behind the original Focus was the dream of a world car, that would be sold, largely unchanged, in markets around the world. With the 2012 model, now being previewed before the Detroit Auto Show [press release here], Ford has gone back to the model’s original vision.

There’s no special American-market version, though the four-door sedan and five-door hatch will be the first to our market. Only a two-liter engine has been confirmed so far, reportedly equipped with stop-start and making 155 hp and 145 lb-ft (1.6 Ecoboost and EV versions could come later). A three-door hatch and a larger station wagon could come to the US later, as could the C-Max minivan built on the same global C-platform. Between all these bodystyles (and likely more for Europe), Ford is eying 2m units of global volume for its global C-segment platform by 2012, making the Focus family something of the global K-car of Ford’s turnaround. Ford claims that this whack at the “Holy Grail” of world-car unification will turn out better than the last several, as design and performance expectations are aligning globally. It’s worked fairly well with the Fiesta so far, but as with the Focus, the important piece of the puzzle is making the model work in the US. We shall see how that works out.




Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 45 comments
  • V6 V6 on Jan 12, 2010

    the location/design of the gas cap flap is a bit weirdo, but i like it as a whole

  • Revolver1978 Revolver1978 on Jan 13, 2010

    As an owner of a 2007 SAAB 9-5 Sportcomi, I've grown accustomed to disspointing news. . . That being said, in a few years I will be n the market of a new wagon. CTS Sportwagon is on the list, as is a Regal GS wagon (if it gets produced.) And, oddly enough, this little number. I like the looks (it's as close to a Mondeo Wagon as we will likely get over here.) I like the G-whizzardry (inner geek likes the MyFord tech.)

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next