Fisker Lines Up $115.3 In Funding, Still Needs To Spend $169m On Karma Engineering

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

With the economy desperately looking for signs that a bottom has been reached, news that Fisker has raised $115m in new funding might indicate that (if nothing else) the money markets are back to their good old speculative selves. At least it might if there weren’t so many darn extenuating circumstances. On the one hand, Fisker seems like the kind of business that has little business attracting much, well, business. Its $90k+ Karma brings little more to the table than some competition for Tesla in the EV-glamor-bauble segment, and like Tesla it’s trying to leverage its first model into ever cheaper, higher-volume vehicles. So why are VC firms giving Fisker the time of day?

The biggest reason is that there’s a half-billion dollars of Department of Energy low-cost retooling loans just waiting for Fisker to tap. And actually, Fisker needed this round of funding to go well in order to meet the DOE’s viability standards for the loan. Needless to say that $529m helped raise the $115m. Whether it made sense for the DOE to jump first on Fisker, essentially “king-making” the firm is another question that is sure to have a less convenient answer.

The other major factor in this funding round is Fisker’s tie-up with A123. The battery maker has also benefited considerably from federal largesse ($250m from ATVML), had a fairly successful IPO, so it’s got cash but lacks customers. Bam, A123 invests $23m into Fisker, making up nearly a quarter of this round of funding. Customer problem solved! Well, at least until Fisker starts, you know, actually selling vehicles. Thus far, consumers have had to take Fisker at face value, but selling and servicing cars is always harder in practice than theory.

The rest of Fisker’s latest round of funding comes from Kleiner Perkinds Caufield & Byers, which essentially doubled down on its earlier investment in Fisker, and Ace Investments.

“Raising $115 million in these times speaks volumes about the value of our business model and the vast potential of plug-in hybrids,” says Heinrik Fisker. It also speaks to how much work Fisker still has to do. According to Reuters, Fisker still needs to spend $169m on engineering for the Karma, which is due to hit the US market… this year. How is that supposed to work? Plus, Fisker has to raise another $27m by mid-February to stay current with its DOE loan terms. There’ll be plenty of time for self congratulation when Fisker is actually selling cars.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 4 comments
  • Adamatari Adamatari on Jan 18, 2010

    I expect a Tesla level of delays - it's natural, though, because they wouldn't get enough speculative money if they were honest... However, just like Tesla, I expect them to put out a product in a year or so that works. Hopefully it works well. Funny how we've heard so little about Tesla now that they actually have a car out... Personally I hope they all do well. It seems to me that to make a new production car (kit cars have separate rules) you already have to be fairly big or have a lot of money, so it's very hard for new companies and new ideas to get off the ground. The consequence is hype, hype, hype to run up the money.

  • Kurkosdr Kurkosdr on Jan 19, 2010

    Is it just me, or the Karma's front grille makes the car look like it's mad at something? Look it from any possible angle, and it's ugly. All of the Tesla's cars have much better looks. But on the other hand, Fisker is the only one to give us the Plug-in hybrids we want, so I 'd go for Fisker

    • Accs Accs on Feb 12, 2010

      The overall shape of the vehicle is pretty appealing. It has a nice curvature in the body, a kind of coke bottle look. Tires are of the 20" diameter.. doesn't look like much of a trunk.. but interesting just the same. As far as the front clip goes.. and being mad... Every car.. built in the past 20yrs has a kind of psychological face. Every car either looks mad / pissed off. I actually see it as some kind of a fish. But looks are totally subjective as is their opinion of the design. And technically.. I wouldn't buy either... Just based on the concept of buying a hybrid. I actually like to drive = this hybrid / performance hybrid is BUNK.

  • Cprescott I have watched a series of teardown videos by Munro and Associates (sycophants to Tesla) and cannot believe the hoodwinking that was done with this POS. There was no way it was ever going to sell the golf cart with a bed for the price they said. I cannot believe all of the space those motors take up - so huge and expensive. And the battery pack is the size of Rhode Island!
  • Rick T. That's the way the (Milano) cookie crumbles.
  • ChristianWimmer My requirements are simple: I love driving fast (Autobahn) and I want a relatively generous and stable range while using creature comforts. No EV on the market can satisfy this requirement, hence I am not interested in one.
  • Cprescott Jeep has become fool's gold - thinking they can move this brand upmarket and charge outrageous prices without regard to keeping track of market conditions.
  • Chiefmonkey Did these have the same security/theft problem that other Kias have? lol
Next