By on January 18, 2010

With the economy desperately looking for signs that a bottom has been reached, news that Fisker has raised $115m in new funding might indicate that (if nothing else) the money markets are back to their good old speculative selves. At least it might if there weren’t so many darn extenuating circumstances. On the one hand, Fisker seems like the kind of business that has little business attracting much, well, business. Its $90k+ Karma brings little more to the table than some competition for Tesla in the EV-glamor-bauble segment, and like Tesla it’s trying to leverage its first model into ever cheaper, higher-volume vehicles. So why are VC firms giving Fisker the time of day?

The biggest reason is that there’s a half-billion dollars of Department of Energy low-cost retooling loans just waiting for Fisker to tap. And actually, Fisker needed this round of funding to go well in order to meet the DOE’s viability standards for the loan. Needless to say that $529m helped raise the $115m. Whether it made sense for the DOE to jump first on Fisker, essentially “king-making” the firm is another question that is sure to have a less convenient answer.

The other major factor in this funding round is Fisker’s tie-up with A123. The battery maker has also benefited considerably from federal largesse ($250m from ATVML), had a fairly successful IPO, so it’s got cash but lacks customers. Bam, A123 invests $23m into Fisker, making up nearly a quarter of this round of funding. Customer problem solved! Well, at least until Fisker starts, you know, actually selling vehicles. Thus far, consumers have had to take Fisker at face value, but selling and servicing cars is always harder in practice than theory.

The rest of Fisker’s latest round of funding comes from Kleiner Perkinds Caufield & Byers, which essentially doubled down on its earlier investment in Fisker, and Ace Investments.

“Raising $115 million in these times speaks volumes about the value of our business model and the vast potential of plug-in hybrids,” says Heinrik Fisker. It also speaks to how much work Fisker still has to do. According to Reuters, Fisker still needs to spend $169m on engineering for the Karma, which is due to hit the US market… this year. How is that supposed to work? Plus, Fisker has to raise another $27m by mid-February to stay current with its DOE loan terms. There’ll be plenty of time for self congratulation when Fisker is actually selling cars.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

4 Comments on “Fisker Lines Up $115.3 In Funding, Still Needs To Spend $169m On Karma Engineering...”

  • avatar
    Paul Niedermeyer

    Ed, you and I both know at least one potential frisky Fisker buyer: MD

  • avatar

    I expect a Tesla level of delays – it’s natural, though, because they wouldn’t get enough speculative money if they were honest…  However, just like Tesla, I expect them to put out a product in a year or so that works.  Hopefully it works well.
    Funny how we’ve heard so little about Tesla now that they actually have a car out…   Personally I hope they all do well.  It seems to me that to make a new production car (kit cars have separate rules) you already have to be fairly big or have a lot of money, so it’s very hard for new companies and new ideas to get off the ground.  The consequence is hype, hype, hype to run up the money.

  • avatar

    Is it just me, or the Karma’s front grille makes the car look like it’s mad at something? Look it from any possible angle, and it’s ugly.
    All of the Tesla’s cars have much better looks. But on the other hand, Fisker is the only one to give us the Plug-in hybrids we want, so I ‘d go for Fisker

    • 0 avatar

      The overall shape of the vehicle is pretty appealing. It has a nice curvature in the body, a kind of coke bottle look.

      Tires are of the 20″ diameter.. doesn’t look like much of a trunk.. but interesting just the same.

      As far as the front clip goes.. and being mad…

      Every car.. built in the past 20yrs has a kind of psychological face. Every car either looks mad / pissed off. I actually see it as some kind of a fish. But looks are totally subjective as is their opinion of the design.

      And technically..
      I wouldn’t buy either…
      Just based on the concept of buying a hybrid.

      I actually like to drive = this hybrid / performance hybrid is BUNK.

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: Automotive News Late, Wrong On Cadillac XTS De-Livery News

    Compaq Deskpro - I don’t understand why anyone would leave behind fleet sales. Sounds like the Escalade will continue to be the only real...
  • Re: Don’t Buy a 2015 Buick Regal

    Davekaybsc - I really wanted to like the Regal. It looks “fine” no worse than any other midsizer, it’s FAR quieter than most, handles surprisingly...
  • Re: Don’t Buy a 2015 Buick Regal

    SatelliteView - So gasoline engine can’t be “techie”??? you think 1990s gas engines are same as 2010s gas engines??? And then, diesel engine is a new,...
  • Re: 2015 Subaru Legacy Rental Car Review

    tonycd - “Value isn’t just ‘what it costs’, but ‘what you get’.” Yep, there we agree 100%. “The Outback is a damn big...
  • Re: Don’t Buy a 2015 Buick Regal

    matador - They won’t have to worry about me for now. Can I purchase a 2015 Regal in 10 years, though?
  • Re: Don’t Buy a 2015 Buick Regal

    SatelliteView - Are you sure your car is non-American? Where was it assembled and what nationality is its parts content?
  • Re: Crapwagon Outtake: 1987 Buick Regal Turbo

    DenverMike - Why would they *need* to pull a “fast one” on the suits? See that’s what I’m talking about. The over all FU to enthusiasts...
  • Re: Piston Slap: The Fallacy of Aftermarket Performance?

    mazdaman007 - I put on 215/45R18 and according to the calculator the new circumference is 80.5 inches vs 78.8 inches for the stock. It...
  • Re: Don’t Buy a 2015 Buick Regal

    z9 - If I find a huge discount off MSRP on a car, it can be very attractive, but I really need to want the car. That would work for one-of-a-kind models — if I...
  • Re: Don’t Buy a 2015 Buick Regal

    Luke42 - I’m 36, and I’m in to the “nice but not ostentatious” approach to things. There’s nothing wrong with Buick from that perspective....

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote


  • Contributing Writers

  • Jack Baruth, United States
  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Vojta Dobes, Czech Republic
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, United States
  • Cameron Aubernon, United States
  • J Emerson, United States