By on December 16, 2009

Let’s go! Picture courtesy life.com

Freshly wedded Suzuki and Volkswagen are not losing any time in consummating the marriage. Joint work will start immediately, or rather on January 10, 2010 said Suzuki Chief Executive Osamu Suzuki to Reuters. With that date, Suzuki-San is already bowing to Wolfsburg’s ingrained culture. As of this coming Friday evening, everybody who is somebody at VW will be off skiing in Zermatt or soaking in the surf of the Maledives, not to return before January 10th. No linkup with Suzuki will change that.

At the sidelines of the launch of the Alto minicar in Tokyo, Suzuki said to reporters: “We generally understand what we want from each other. Actual, detailed execution — with our people going there and their people coming here — will be after January.” If you are planning any trips between Tokyo and Frankfurt for early 2010, book now. JAL and Lufthansa will be sold out.

And what’s so urgent to get going? Suzuki said the new partners have agreed they want to develop a competitive, small car, seen as key to taking the lead in developing countries. Pressed for more, Suzuki remained silent.

“Working together in the ultra-small segment will probably reap the biggest benefit for both companies,” said Fumikazu Kitagawa, managing director at Nomura Research Institute.”With small cars, you can’t go in half-heartedly. But hardly anyone dares because it’s so difficult to make money.”

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

6 Comments on “Suzuki And VW Are In A Hurry...”


  • avatar
    criminalenterprise

    This is only relevant to developing nations today, but eventually the U.S. will be a competitive market for sub-$8,000 cars.
    Automobile prices in real dollar terms have been subject to eye-popping inflation over the past 30 years.  Look at the MSRP of anything from the 50s or 60s and plug it into an inflation calculator. Don Draper’s Cadillac, not the casual accoutrement of the bourgeoisie, would cost the equivalent of $37,000 in today’s money.  A Ferrari supercar of the same era would set you back about $95,000; a Miura went for the same as $140,000.
    Today a representational equivalent in almost every segment would run just around twice the price of its forebear.
    It’s about time we see some real pressure to the other direction.

  • avatar
    Rod Panhard

    I dunno about that Mr. Criminalenterprise. In 1970, a stripped VW Beetle set you back $1874, not including destination charges. VW has gone “upscale” so the Golf is not equivalent to the Beetle. However, the stripped Nissan Versa is equivalent for the marketplace, and it’s price is …. $10,710 including destination charges. So, according to the inflation calculator at Westegg…What cost $1874 in 1970 would cost $10280.50 in 2008.

    • 0 avatar
      criminalenterprise

      Certainly there’s some nonlinear distribution, where the low end tends to stay low and the high end tends to get higher.  The median family car has seen its price creep up at a pace that outran consumer inflation by a substantial margin.
       
      Here’s an interesting little page I uncovered while poking around to add some more perspective:
      http://www.loqu.com/top-10-all-time-best-value-cars/blogs/hotday-4872
      (A Challenger R/T ran =$17,000!)

    • 0 avatar
      superbadd75

      Your VW example was way more stripped than even the most base Versa available. The Versa includes a fuel injected engine with 106hp, front, side, and curtain airbags, tilt steering wheel, and a few other nice things that no Bug had at any price. Cars have gotten cheaper over the years when you adjust for inflation, and they include more stuff.

  • avatar
    educatordan

    The market for these vehicles in the U.S. will only become strong if people are rational enough to say: “Hey I have 2 or 3 vehicles why not have one be basic and frugal to operate?  I don’t need a 5,000lb SUV to get my butt to work.”

  • avatar
    Glenn Mercer

    One other thing: a reason one sees these ultra-cheap cars in developing markets but not so much in developed markets (aside from stronger safety and emissions regulations, etc.) is competition: it is pretty hard to compete against the 250,000,000 USED cars on the road in the USA.  One can get the functional equivalent of a Nano in the form of Geo Metro on eBay for probably $2,000 (seats 4, gets 55 mpg, no AC, etc.).  So I am not sure there is more downward pressure to be placed on new car prices here in the USA that has not already occurred via the vast fleet of existing new cars.  Note that India pretty much bans the import of used cars… I wonder how the Nano would fare in an open market?  Used cars have less impact in developing markets because let’s face it, a 10-year-old old Maruti is pretty much beat to a pulp.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Authors

  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • J & J Sutherland, Canada
  • Tycho de Feyter, China
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Faisal Ali Khan, India