By on December 23, 2009

As the recession continues, more and more motorists have decided to ignore red light camera and speed camera tickets issued by private companies like Redflex Traffic Systems. According to a report issued earlier today by the Australian photo enforcement giant, such non-payment contributed to a significant drop in expected profit for the first half of the fiscal year. Previously reported problems, such as the “expensive failure” of freeway photo radar in Arizona, led to a shareholder revolt last month.

“Despite earlier expectations that the Arizona state-wide photo enforcement program would make a significant contribution to the year’s result, further deterioration in the rate of infringement detections and the revenue entitlement through collections has resulted in reduced expectations, both for the first half and for the full year,” the company admitted in a statement to Australian shareholders. “Many initiatives are under way to deal with the issues encountered, and we expect gradual improvement as these initiatives gain traction in the months ahead.”

The group CameraFraud has led a resistance effort to the use of freeway cameras in Arizona, causing a number of headaches for the troubled firm. Public pressure stoked by the group forced officials to scale back on the number of photo radar vans deployed to far less than half of the 200 units authorized by the statewide contract. Impromptu protests and the use of Post-It Notes on camera lenses have cut deeply into the ability of the devices that are deployed to issue tickets.

CameraFraud has also led an educational effort to inform motorists that they face no consequences if a citation mailed in Arizona is thrown in the trash. Under a 1992 state appeals court ruling, no ticket is valid unless it is served in person (view opinion). Motorists who dodge a process server for ninety days face no points, penalty or hit on their credit rating as the citation must be dismissed under state law.

A number of other problems plague Redflex. The company has spent a tremendous amount of money defending itself against a lawsuit from American Traffic Solutions which argues that the state of Arizona should never have awarded the Australian company a photo radar contract because at the time of bidding, Redflex had admittedly been using illegally imported radar equipment, in violation of federal law (view case). The company also cited the “high cost of lobbying” as Redflex invests foreign funds into American lawmakers to promote the expansion of photo enforcement throughout the country.

Despite the problems, Redflex remains a profitable company. The company’s bottom line, however, has narrowed to a mere $4 million net profit before tax for the first half of fiscal 2010. Redflex shares plunged ten percent from A$2.30 to $2.08 following the announcement.

9 Comments on “Redflex Profit Shrinks as Motorists Ignore Photo Tickets...”



Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: The Fisker Saga, Courtesy of GigaOM

    golden2husky - Sadly, a lot of people work for free. How many people work well beyond the normal workday on a regular basis? More do than don’t I’m willing...
  • Re: Junkyard Find: 1985 Toyota Camry LE Liftback

    JD23 - My A4 has a ridiculous 180 mph speedometer. The car is electronically limited to 130 mph, and even if the electronic limiter were removed, it’s...
  • Re: The Truth About Brazilian Cars Being “Unsafe”

    tresmonos - Great counter point, Derek and Marcelo. Great read. You’ll be getting Brazil spec 2014 Fiesta’s from Cuautitlan fairly...
  • Re: Junkyard Find: 1953 Chrysler New Yorker

    ixim - I believe those original Hydramatics were 4 speeds with a simple fluid coupling. NDLR. There was no “Park” position; you could lock up the...
  • Re: GM Stock In Plus Territory

    highdesertcat - I bought Ed’s book and after reading it I donated the book to the library at the military base. I understand from the librarian there that there is a...
  • Re: New or Used? : The Brass Ring Edition

    burgersandbeer - Is the S2000 experience with snow tires?
  • Re: GM Stock In Plus Territory

    Buickman - read Whitacre’s book. he blames bad management. me too.
  • Re: GM Stock In Plus Territory

    highdesertcat - “@HDC- you are entitled to your emotional beliefs, but not made up facts. We are entitled to point out the error in your understanding and perceptions...
  • Re: New or Used? : The Brass Ring Edition

    snakebit - I saw the talk about driving in winter, and the mention of the S2000, and had to give my two cents. The combination of winter(read snow) and S2000 is a...
  • Re: Junkyard Find: 1953 Chrysler New Yorker

    Andy D - The 3 speed Torque Flite was a darn fine transmission. Olds had the first 2 speed automatic ~ 1940. GM led in automagic in the 50′s but the base...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Authors

  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • J & J Sutherland, Canada
  • Tycho de Feyter, China
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Clemens Gleich, Germany
  • Doug DeMuro, Atlanta
  • Phil Coconis, Los Angeles
  • Faisal Ali Khan, India
  • Michael Karesh, Detroit