By on November 12, 2009

Mind the obvious pun! (courtesy:infinibeam)

Were you looking forward to GM’s first post-bankruptcy financial report, set to be released on Monday? We sure were. Right up until we read that the earning statement won’t be compliant with a little something called Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Automotive News [sub] reports that GM will use so-called “managerial accounting,” (do we have an accountant in the house?) until Q1 2010 results are filed using SEC-approved “fresh start accounting.” The SEC is apparently aware that GM is still transitioning to the post-bankruptcy accounting system, and has reportedly approved GM’s timetable for compliance. Meanwhile, GM’s 3rd quarter results will be announced in two parts, for the period it was in bankruptcy (June 1- June 9) and after (June 10- September 30). GM’s spokesperson is kind enough to explain:

In some cases, it’s not comparable to do a year-to-year comparison. Anything with a cost component to it, won’t be comparable. For sales and revenue, it will be comparable. It’s going to be kind of complicated this time around. There’s no way around that. It’s not a standard situation.

Don’t you just hate it when that happens? You try and you try to be transparent, and then your financial results come out all unintelligible because it takes the better part of a year to switch accounting systems. No wonder Whitacre is downplaying talk of a Summer 2010 IPO.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

8 Comments on “GM’s Monday Earnings Report: Mind The GAAP...”


  • avatar
    Tommy

    This is about as transparent as the classic shell game.

  • avatar
    GS650G

    Is Gm playing three card monty again?

  • avatar
    lahru

    My experience with managerial accounting is exactly what it’s name implies. You suck and you and your department must work harder and smarter. We, as being the folks who decide how much you are contributing to the companies bottom line, have determined that unlessyou can contribute more in the next quarter, you suck and we will blame you and your team. See, we are the guy’s that have the exclusive use of the elevator to the top of the RenCen and will determine your fate and please don’t touch us nor ask what we are doing because we are making decisions that are way above your pay grade and you would probobly would not understand.
     
    Now back to work, no bonus for you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • avatar
    PeteMoran

    By way of otherwise irrelevant trivia, the SEC approved Enron’s mark-to-market accounting request. They may have missed a fraudster called Madoff too.

  • avatar
    Lorenzo

    Come on guys, be reasonable. Wasn’t GM’s CFO one Mr. Wagoner before becoming Chairman? Weren’t GM’s books so bad that a GM auditor left under a cloud when the SEC reviewed the books? Didn’t the replacement CFO, Mr. Henderson get elevated to CEO before he could paper over, er… clean up the books? Didn’t a PTFOA guy express surprise at the accounting mess GM had on its hands?
     
    Given all that, it’s totally understandable that it’s taking so long to track down at the source the creative math that was applied for years. When they say “our books have been messed up so bad and for so long that we need more time to clean them up”, they’re obviously telling the truth. It doesn’t get more transparent than that.

    • 0 avatar
      guyincognito

      Its the “we need more time to clean them up” part that I’m finding hard to believe. If they said, ‘we need more time to come up with new, harder to detect, creative accounting methods to cover up our growing insolvency’, I would find that more truthful.

  • avatar
    ton12

    From what I remember in my business classes:
    GAAP accounting or financial accounting – reporting system used for tax purposes and public reporting
    Managerial accounting – the real accounting all businesses use to actually operate a company

    Don’t under estimate this. The clarity we might get from this report may tell us more about the strength of the company than GAAP.

  • avatar
    mkII

    Yes you can compare those statements – there is just a series of reconciliations to derive those numbers on same basis. Large companies like top 20 banks and fortune 50 companies do that, GM obviously… not.  For once, don’t hate the game, hate the player.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributing Writers

  • Jack Baruth, United States
  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Vojta Dobes, Czech Republic
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Cameron Aubernon, United States
  • J Emerson, United States