By on November 12, 2009

Mind the obvious pun! (courtesy:infinibeam)

Were you looking forward to GM’s first post-bankruptcy financial report, set to be released on Monday? We sure were. Right up until we read that the earning statement won’t be compliant with a little something called Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Automotive News [sub] reports that GM will use so-called “managerial accounting,” (do we have an accountant in the house?) until Q1 2010 results are filed using SEC-approved “fresh start accounting.” The SEC is apparently aware that GM is still transitioning to the post-bankruptcy accounting system, and has reportedly approved GM’s timetable for compliance. Meanwhile, GM’s 3rd quarter results will be announced in two parts, for the period it was in bankruptcy (June 1- June 9) and after (June 10- September 30). GM’s spokesperson is kind enough to explain:

In some cases, it’s not comparable to do a year-to-year comparison. Anything with a cost component to it, won’t be comparable. For sales and revenue, it will be comparable. It’s going to be kind of complicated this time around. There’s no way around that. It’s not a standard situation.

Don’t you just hate it when that happens? You try and you try to be transparent, and then your financial results come out all unintelligible because it takes the better part of a year to switch accounting systems. No wonder Whitacre is downplaying talk of a Summer 2010 IPO.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

8 Comments on “GM’s Monday Earnings Report: Mind The GAAP...”


  • avatar
    Tommy

    This is about as transparent as the classic shell game.

  • avatar
    GS650G

    Is Gm playing three card monty again?

  • avatar
    lahru

    My experience with managerial accounting is exactly what it’s name implies. You suck and you and your department must work harder and smarter. We, as being the folks who decide how much you are contributing to the companies bottom line, have determined that unlessyou can contribute more in the next quarter, you suck and we will blame you and your team. See, we are the guy’s that have the exclusive use of the elevator to the top of the RenCen and will determine your fate and please don’t touch us nor ask what we are doing because we are making decisions that are way above your pay grade and you would probobly would not understand.
     
    Now back to work, no bonus for you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • avatar
    PeteMoran

    By way of otherwise irrelevant trivia, the SEC approved Enron’s mark-to-market accounting request. They may have missed a fraudster called Madoff too.

  • avatar
    Lorenzo

    Come on guys, be reasonable. Wasn’t GM’s CFO one Mr. Wagoner before becoming Chairman? Weren’t GM’s books so bad that a GM auditor left under a cloud when the SEC reviewed the books? Didn’t the replacement CFO, Mr. Henderson get elevated to CEO before he could paper over, er… clean up the books? Didn’t a PTFOA guy express surprise at the accounting mess GM had on its hands?
     
    Given all that, it’s totally understandable that it’s taking so long to track down at the source the creative math that was applied for years. When they say “our books have been messed up so bad and for so long that we need more time to clean them up”, they’re obviously telling the truth. It doesn’t get more transparent than that.

    • 0 avatar
      guyincognito

      Its the “we need more time to clean them up” part that I’m finding hard to believe. If they said, ‘we need more time to come up with new, harder to detect, creative accounting methods to cover up our growing insolvency’, I would find that more truthful.

  • avatar
    ton12

    From what I remember in my business classes:
    GAAP accounting or financial accounting – reporting system used for tax purposes and public reporting
    Managerial accounting – the real accounting all businesses use to actually operate a company

    Don’t under estimate this. The clarity we might get from this report may tell us more about the strength of the company than GAAP.

  • avatar
    mkII

    Yes you can compare those statements – there is just a series of reconciliations to derive those numbers on same basis. Large companies like top 20 banks and fortune 50 companies do that, GM obviously… not.  For once, don’t hate the game, hate the player.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: Generation Why: I Want My S16

    mnm4ever - @bball, I think the Lincoln is a terrific idea. Stretch the chassis a bit, make it around the size of the Challenger, a coupe with a usable back seat and a more...
  • Re: Generation Why: I Want My S16

    Lie2me - The average age of Mustang buyers is 48 http://www.usatoday.com/story/ money/cars/2014/09/18/2015-mus tang/15800057/ NOT boomers The average age of new-vehicle...
  • Re: Generation Why: I Want My S16

    johnny_5.0 - Your comment doesn’t hold water where I live (relatively affluent tech heavy city). Tons of young people driving both Mustangs and Camaros. I sold my IS...
  • Re: Junkyard Find: 2001 Pontiac Aztek AWD

    Sigivald - Starting at about $50 you can get OBD-II connected ones aftermarket, from China. Projector, a little bit of reflective film for the windshield, and a long...
  • Re: Generation Why: I Want My S16

    brenschluss - “Personally, I feel like the Mustang is a whole lot more than the sum of its exhaust note and displacement. I love the roar of a mighty V8, but I also...
  • Re: While You Were Sleeping: February 11th, 2015

    RobertRyan - http://m.ibtimes.com/mexico-au to-industry-why-are-kia-motors -bmw-nissan-mercedes-headed-so uth-border-1671486 http://www.forbes.com/sites...
  • Re: Generation Why: I Want My S16

    mikesae - Derek, which one is giving more smiles per mile- Ecoboost Mustang or Focus ST?
  • Re: Generation Why: I Want My S16

    carguy - No argument its a good engine but it has no performance, or economy advantages over the 2.3T but has none of the tuning overhead.
  • Re: While You Were Sleeping: February 11th, 2015

    RobertRyan - Oh we have the UAW getting its panties in a knot, when the word production is mentioned
  • Re: The Future Of The Holden Commodore, In One Image

    Manic - “Astra and Insignia are renowned in Europe for their boringness and beginner sales rep. vehicle credentials” -there, I fixed it.

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributing Writers

  • Jack Baruth, United States
  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Vojta Dobes, Czech Republic
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Cameron Aubernon, United States
  • J Emerson, United States