GME To Rsselheim, Where Chaos Reigns

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

This week’s chronicle of the Opel saga starts with good news and bad news.

The good news: GM’s European headquarters will move from Zurich, Switzerland, to Opel’s home in Rüsselsheim near Frankfurt, Germany, reports Die Zeit. The paper: “With the move, the company probably wants to collect points to calm down the German government.” Let’s put it this way: Putting the European GM headquarters into a country that is not even part of the EU, that is more known for its tax haven status than for its flourishing auto industry, did not amuse the Germans. Returning to Deutschland, GM can pat itself on the back: The move created 150 jobs in Rüsselsheim, which are lost in Zurich.

The bad news: It’s too late to collect points.



Germany’s Economy Minister Brüderle doesn’t want to spend a Cent on Opel. Brüderle thinks that “if at all, then the individual states should help,” writes the Rheinische Post. Then the paper adds: ”This is highly unlikely.” Right they are. If the states cough up money, it will be tied to keeping plants open and workers employed. This however is completely verboten by Brussels: No government money tied to saving jobs or plants allowed. Then why pay at all?

Nobody knows how much keeping Opel open will cost anyway. GM figures it’s €3b, a number that is widely regarded as a pipe dream.

IG-Metall union boss Armin Schild, according to Rheinische Post. figures “the restructuring will cost €6b, probably more like €7b.”

Magna thought the price tag would be €4.5b

Moody’s, according to Reuters: €5.8B

KPMG, according to Reuters, reckoned in September it would be €4.1b

A good chunk of the money will be needed to get rid of workers. In Europe, unless you go bankrupt, you need to pay them off. If GM wants to shed 10,000 jobs in Europe, then that alone will cost them €2.5b over the next 18 months, Die Welt learned. Apparently, that little detail just had slipped by Whitacre.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 3 comments
  • Wmba Wmba on Nov 16, 2009

    More amazing revelations. Thanks Bertel for the heads up on the severance payments. Here in Canada today, we get this in the National Post newspaper: "General Motors Co. may use some of the money it won from Canadian and U.S. taxpayers in the spring to fix its Opel unit in Europe in the months ahead as it works out a new financing plan for the money-losing business. That could include tapping funds pledged by the federal and Ontario governments, said Chris Preuss, new GM's vice-president of global communications." And TTAC reports today, with caveats of course: "GM plans to repay the United States, Canadian and Ontario government loans in quarterly installments from escrowed funds, beginning next month with an initial $1.2 billion payment to be made in December." Since the only money they have is the taxpayer loans, where do they expect to get the money to pay for Opel and pay back taxpayers at the same time? It just gets worse. Maybe they should earmark some funds to repair the roof leak at the Bochum plant outside the paint shop, as reported in Business Week.

  • Newcarscostalot Newcarscostalot on Nov 17, 2009

    Maybe I should put that sign on my bathroom door...

  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
  • 1995 SC No
Next