By on November 23, 2009

Love, it seems, is the only thing that hasn't been lost (courtesy:WSJ)

As congress nears the end of the 2009 legislative session, culled GM and Chrysler dealers are pushing hard for the rapid passage of the Automobile Dealer Economic Rights Restoration Act. Meanwhile, nearly two dozen members of the Senate Commerce Committee from both parties are calling on GM and Chrysler to resolve outstanding disputes with culled dealers in hopes of defusing the situation by non-legislative means.

Given the federal government’s ownership stake in Chrysler and GM, it is our shared obligation to ensure all impacted dealers are treated as fairly as possible. We continue to urge you to take all actions necessary to uphold the assurances you provided earlier, as well as to achieve a mutually agreeable and timely outcome to the negotiations between Chrysler, GM and the dealers.  Chrysler and GM’s unprecedented bankruptcy has greatly impacted dealers, consumers, employees, small businesses, and communities across the country. It is crucial that outstanding issues be resolved as expeditiously and efficiently as possible to provide the least amount of hardship to Chrysler, GM and the dealers.

GM’s response to the senatorial call out? “Those discussions are still underway,” according to spokespeople, who refused to characterize the discussions for Reuters. Meanwhile, two examples of possible mitigating action by GM and Chrysler are not off to good starts.

GM’s immediate solution to the situation appears to be to ignore the dealers and reach out to those dealers’ customers. According to Automotive News [sub], GM is offering free tire rotation and 45-day discounts of $1k-$2k per vehicle to 950,000 customers of the company’s closed dealerships. According to a letter to dealers obtained by AN [sub], the incentive amount depends on the “likelihood to purchase a GM vehicle and the relative distance to the next closest dealer.” A second wave of the program targeting Saturn customers is planned for next year, say GM spokesfolks, but the first round isn’t exactly doing much to smooth things over for the culled dealers. This is an inappropriate time to take such an aggressive measure,” Tamara Darvish of the Committee to Restore Dealer Rights tells AN [sub]. “If in fact dealer rights are to be restored, why would GM go in and move all those customers?” Probably because GM has no intention of restoring culled dealers, and is guessing that the ADERRA won’t be passed.

Meanwhile, Chrysler’s dealer wind-down strategy is facing its own speedbumps. Automotive News [sub] also reports that Chrysler’s offer to buy back parts from culled dealers for 68 cents on the dollar is being widely rejected. Chrysler had initially tried to act as a broker, helping culled dealers sell parts inventories to the remaining dealers. However, as Chrysler spokespeople explain “We were asked by congressional leaders to consider doing more if dealers were unable to sell their parts inventories through the matchmaker system.” The result of that legislative intervention was the 68 cents on the dollar offer, which includes conditions requiring that (among other things) parts not meeting Chrysler’s eligibility requirements to be shipped back to the dealer at the dealer’s expense and dropping all parts-related claims against “old” and “new” Chrysler. Dealers have until November 27 to take up the offer.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

5 Comments on “Dealer Cull Fallout Swirls...”


  • avatar
    segfault

    It’s way too late to talk about reopening the dead dealerships.  Those that still have new inventory are down to a couple of vehicles.

  • avatar
    texasred

    Anyone know specifics on how GM dealt with Oldsmobile franchise dealerships (other than badly)? Our big local Olds dealer was so upset, he dumpstered Olds maintenance and sales documents dating back to the 40′s rather than turn it over. I don’t know what/how GM closed down Olds dealers and if it might be a pattern for the current slash and burn of dealerships.
    Can anybody help?
    Thanks for TTAC. And thanks in advance for any responses.
    C.J.

  • avatar
    mtypex

    I don’t understand how Buick-GMC or Buick-Cadillac-GMC dealers will survive … not enough sales.  Here’s a vote for consolidation into Chevrobuickillac showrooms!
    I’m being facetious.  I do not want to see Cadillacs in the same showroom as Chevrolets… which you already have in many cases.

  • avatar
    Detroit Todd

    …nearly two dozen members of the Senate Commerce Committee from both parties are calling on GM and Chrysler to resolve outstanding disputes with culled dealers in hopes of defusing the situation by non-legislative means.

    Meaning that absent Congressional action (and it will be absent), the dealers should FOAD.   There will be no legislative means. 

    In this political environment, no one cares about thieves (car dealers) wearing shiny suits in flyover country, with their hair that smells of V05 and sulphur. 

    Their day has passed.

    Yet somehow, the American economy soldiers on….

  • avatar
    jacad

    One has to admire anyone who can quote so many inane metaphors in so little space as Detroit Todd in an attempt to piss-off the majority of the citizenry and make himself sound erudite to the unwashed masses!


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: What’s Next At TTAC

    Jeff Waingrow - I’ve been suggesting this to Derek for a while now. Eventually, a way must be found to do this.
  • Re: Honda Dealerships Asked To Issue Wavers Over Defective Airbags

    Thatkat09 - I mean, I guess its better than not saying anything. At least the buyer of one of these used cars knows some things up and will...
  • Re: What’s Next At TTAC

    Jeff Waingrow - Hey, Dead Weight, a very, very good post. Maybe one of your best?
  • Re: Marchionne: Alfa Romeo Still Not For Sale

    bobman - I can’t believe some of the comments here regarding Alfa achieving its sales goals. The one that is the most ridiculous is lack of distribution. It...
  • Re: Generation Why: A Sub-$30k Car “Wouldn’t Be A Lexus”

    Quentin - Yeah, I usually agree with CR as well, but my test drive of an AWD IS350 F sport left me very impressed. The chassis and...
  • Re: What’s Next At TTAC

    FractureCritical - my only comment to the new EiC is to do things his own way. TTAC is a good site, but I see the same few people in the comment lines every day, and some...
  • Re: What’s Next At TTAC

    Thomas Kreutzer - As someone who has had things go live with some pretty glaring errors I too would value this, mostly because it would make me look a lot less like the chump I...
  • Re: What’s Next At TTAC

    psarhjinian - I’d help a bit, too. Democratized copy-editing, only we’d copy-edit first rather than in the comments.
  • Re: What’s Next At TTAC

    psarhjinian - TTAC used to have a few good men (Daniel Stern and Jeff Puthuff) who did exactly this. That level of journalism went away with Mr. Farago’s...
  • Re: Honda Dealerships Asked To Issue Wavers Over Defective Airbags

    Detroit-X - Amazing, never-ending Honda arrogance, plain and simple. How about signing waivers/warnings for other Honda failures too: like...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Authors

  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • Tycho de Feyter, China
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Faisal Ali Khan, India