Chrysler Creates RAM Brand in Preparation for Chapter 7

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

As Colonel George Taylor would say, they’ve finally done it. Chrysler, the formerly bankrupt, federally-financed, Italian-owned carmaker has created a fourth automotive brand: Ram. As the company can’t come out and say they’re hiving-off Ram trucks to simplify Chrysler’s inevitable Chapter 7 fire sale, CEO Sergio Marchionne’s birth announcement blamed Dodge for the move (of all things). “This reorganization will allow us to protect and develop the unique nature of the product offerings within the Dodge Brand.” Yeah, ’cause all those Dodge Rams were muddying-up Dodge’s otherwise pristine image, used to such great effect with the Caliber and Avenger. To continue Dodge’s evolution towards filling Pontiac’s performance remit (I shit you not), Sergio’s appointed Ralph Gilles as the old brand’s new head, which will, presumably, no longer be that of a male sheep. As Gilles is the Canadian designer who unleashed the gangsta-riffic Chrysler 300, here’s hoping for an official name change to “The Dodge Boyz.” Meanwhile, The Detroit News [sub] is ROTFL about Sergio’s intentions to take Chrysler upmarket. Apparently, it’s going to be a “tough sell.”

Here, finally, is a Detroit News story that eviscerates of a boneheaded Motown plan. Never mind that they rely entirely on “analysts” for the disemboweling bit. It’s all good. I mean, bad.

– “GM spent $2 billion over 10 years on Cadillac — and it was already upscale,” said Rebecca Lindland, head of industry research for the Americas for IHS Global Insight in Lexington, Mass. . . .

– “At this stage of their rehabilitation, I think that’s real folly,” said analyst Joe Phillippi of AutoTrends Consulting Inc. in Short Hills, N.J.

– “To maintain anywhere near their former healthy volumes, they would be counting heavily on Dodge vehicles to capture current Chrysler buyers, which is in no way a given,” [John Sousanis, director of information content for Ward’s Information Products] said.

– “Fiat needs to do a tremendous amount of market research before jumping into this,” [Lindland] said.

– Libby said Chrysler would need a complete makeover of existing vehicles to justify raising prices and would have to radically change its lineup, including the addition of a flagship sedan in the $70,000 range, and its starting point is “not nearly as strong as Cadillac or Lincoln.”

– It would not be an easy shift, said John Casesa, managing partner of Casesa Shapiro Group in New York. “It’s much easier to go downmarket than upmarket.”

– “They’d be faced with the problem of introducing a new luxury brand to a public that already has misgivings about the Chrysler brand name in general,” [Sousanis] said.

– Quality issues have dragged down consumers’ perceptions of the brand, Phillippi said, and people shopping for a luxury car are unlikely to think of Chrysler.

All those in favor say “aye.” Anyone? Bueller?

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 37 comments
  • 2manyvettes Since all of my cars have V8 gas engines (with one exception, a V6) guess what my opinion is about a cheap EV. And there is even a Tesla supercharger all of a mile from my house.
  • Cla65691460 April 24 (Reuters) - A made-in-China electric vehicle will hit U.S. dealers this summer offering power and efficiency similar to the Tesla Model Y, the world's best-selling EV, but for about $8,000 less.
  • FreedMike It certainly wouldn't hurt. But let's think about the demographic here. We're talking people with less money to spend, so it follows that many of them won't have a dedicated place to charge up. Lots of them may be urban dwellers. That means they'll be depending on the current charging infrastructure, which is improving, but isn't "there" yet. So...what would help EV adoption for less-well-heeled buyers, in my opinion, is improved charging options. We also have to think about the 900-pound gorilla in the room, namely: how do automakers make this category more profitable? The answer is clear: you go after margin, which means more expensive vehicles. That goes a long way to explaining why no one's making cheap EVS for our market. So...maybe cheaper EVs aren't all that necessary in the short term.
  • RHD The analyses above are on the nose.It's a hell of a good car, but the mileage is reaching the point where things that should have worn out a long time ago, and didn't, will, such as the alternator, starter, exhaust system, PS pump, and so on. The interiors tend to be the first thing to show wear, other than the tires, of course. The price is too high for a car that probably has less than a hundred thousand miles left in it without major repairs. A complete inspection is warranted, of course, and then a lower offer based on what it needs. Ten grand for any 18-year-old car is a pretty good chunk of change. It would be a very enjoyable, ride, though.
  • Fred I would get the Acura RDX, to replace my Honda HR-V. Both it and the CRV seats are uncomfortable on longer trips.
Next