Subaru Eyes Continuously-Variable Brand Destruction

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Subaru’s first US-market continuously-variable transmission (CVT) was a major factor in the 2010 Outback’s recent two-star TTAC review. Not in the “one niggling fault” way either. Think more along the lines of the “metaphor for myriad brand betrayals” kind of dislike. Subaru’s vehicles are getting heavier, their interiors are becoming more plasticky-gimmicky and much of the driving fun once available in say, a stock Impreza, has gone the way of quirky styling and rugged functionality. And guess what? Subaru’s mainstream trend-encies look to be here to stay.

Automotive News [sub] reports that Subaru is considering offering CVTs across their US lineup in a bid to boost fuel efficiency. We are thinking about it, but we don’t have an actual plan about which models,” says Masashi Uemura, a rep for Subaru parent company Fuji Heavy Industries. The Forester and Impreza are rumored to be the next in line for the stepless transmission.

The irony of this decision is, of course, that CVTs seek to address a negative trend (namely, added weight) while amplifying one of that trend’s worst symptoms (namely dull driving experience). Had Subaru not up-sized and up-weighted every vehicle in its US lineup, its efficiency averages would not be the pressing problem they are now.

Sure, Subaru’s commitment to all wheel drive puts it at a disadvantage vis-a-vis FWD competitors, but the unconventional boxer engine-AWD drivetrain is also Subie’s raison d’brand. The happy side-effects of Subaru’s unique drivetrain consistency has been do-anything utility and a modicum of driving pleasure in every model. Subaru gleefully tore through Volvo and Saab’s market share through the 1990s on the back of these traits, carving out one of the most unique niches in the US market.

But Subaru’s success is sowing the seeds of its own undoing. Subaru’s sales have never been better, but they’re coming at the outset of a deliberate campaign of mainstream-oriented brand dilution. The current crop of squidgy scoobs benefit from their recent past of intense brand focus while gaining weight and styling gimmickry which broaden their appeal. For now. When memories of the last several generations of Subarus fade, the brand will be little more than a Buick for the bicoastal crowd (not to mention the lesser Rocky Mountain liberal).

Chasing the junior-Audi market holds a lot of promise, and Subaru’s market-beating sales growth seems to vindicate the approach. And though aging elements of Subaru’s well-cultivated base may appreciate the softer rides and quieter cabins, Subaru is doing little to maintain its appeal to new generations of buyers.

Subaru has already ceded the bottom of the AWD hatchback market to Suzuki’s SX4, giving ground in what was once the core of its brand. Better to consolidate and expand the niche than go all-out for a campaign of mainstream-oriented bland engineering.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 56 comments
  • Harleyflhxi Harleyflhxi on Sep 09, 2009

    Hello, Joyce.

  • J.C. J.C. on Oct 20, 2009
    My Dear John letter to Subaru: Dear Outback, After bringing joy and love into my life for 30 plus years, I'm leaving you! You've let yourself go and now look like every other suburban jelly bean SUV in the 2010 line-up. You just don't care about me. Maybe you can find other lovers but you'll never find another me. For the best, J.C.
  • Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
Next