Quote of the Day: Peter Horbury Edition

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

Last week, our man Thor translated a Q & A with Peter Horbury in Automotorsport.se. Ford’s former global design director was recently demoted to his roots: head of Volvo design. Sadly, Automotorsport failed to discuss Horbury’s career reversal. Equally unfortunate: I had to inform Mr. Johnsen that we can’t lift entire articles. (Automotorsport.se denied our request to republish the piece.) We can, of course, publish excerpts. And Horbury is, like all car designers, a veritable fount of designer-speak. Or not. You’ll see what I mean. Meanwhile, here’s the warm-up for the money shot: “Horbury always missed the sea and the forests surrounding Gothenburg. ‘I like the Bohuslän nature with its clean lines, exactly as I believe car design should be.’ He pauses, thinking. But soon enough he makes a metaphor between U.S. and European design, and how Yanks often exaggerates certain design elements while the European design tradition is more stylish, simpler. . .”

Like a Volvo: you don’t have to bring design elements on each free surface of the bodywork, you should even enjoy the clean, open spaces. As in the coastal landscape here in Bohuslän. Look at Japanese cars, they rarely have any clean surface. As soon as there are, they design a decal, a line or a fold on it. Scandinavian design is cleaner without ornamentation everywhere.

On Lincoln: “The war with GM’s Cadillac is on again. And as before, Cadillac stands for the cheeky, challenging and more spectacular. Lincoln is more prudent in its lines, thrifty with the ornamentation. Discreet luxury.”

Discreet? How discreet can you get?

And now our quote of the day: “Range Rover is nice, Jaguar has through new forms found its soul again, Alfa Romeo looks like Alfa again and Kia Soul looks dashing. In fact, I even like the Renault Megane, that rear is nice.”

Nice?

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • Durishin Durishin on Sep 07, 2009

    @Pig_Iron, Depends what that giant robot does...

  • Michael in San Francisco Michael in San Francisco on Sep 08, 2009

    I agree with the comments about J Mays. The Thunderbird? The 500 (or '95 Passat clone)? The Freestyle (a bloated Allroad)? He's had lots of opportunity to shine but it's been a long, long time now. For Lincoln to be taken seriously they need their own rear drive or 4x4 platforms.

  • SCE to AUX My son cross-shopped the RAV4 and Model Y, then bought the Y. To their surprise, they hated the RAV4.
  • SCE to AUX I'm already driving the cheap EV (19 Ioniq EV).$30k MSRP in late 2018, $23k after subsidy at lease (no tax hassle)$549/year insurance$40 in electricity to drive 1000 miles/month66k miles, no range lossAffordable 16" tiresVirtually no maintenance expensesHyundai (for example) has dramatically cut prices on their EVs, so you can get a 361-mile Ioniq 6 in the high 30s right now.But ask me if I'd go to the Subaru brand if one was affordable, and the answer is no.
  • David Murilee Martin, These Toyota Vans were absolute garbage. As the labor even basic service cost 400% as much as servicing a VW Vanagon or American minivan. A skilled Toyota tech would take about 2.5 hours just to change the air cleaner. Also they also broke often, as they overheated and warped the engine and boiled the automatic transmission...
  • Marcr My wife and I mostly work from home (or use public transit), the kid is grown, and we no longer do road trips of more than 150 miles or so. Our one car mostly gets used for local errands and the occasional airport pickup. The first non-Tesla, non-Mini, non-Fiat, non-Kia/Hyundai, non-GM (I do have my biases) small fun-to-drive hatchback EV with 200+ mile range, instrument display behind the wheel where it belongs and actual knobs for oft-used functions for under $35K will get our money. What we really want is a proper 21st century equivalent of the original Honda Civic. The Volvo EX30 is close and may end up being the compromise choice.
  • Mebgardner I test drove a 2023 2.5 Rav4 last year. I passed on it because it was a very noisy interior, and handled poorly on uneven pavement (filled potholes), which Tucson has many. Very little acoustic padding mean you talk loudly above 55 mph. The forums were also talking about how the roof leaks from not properly sealed roof rack holes, and door windows leaking into the lower door interior. I did not stick around to find out if all that was true. No talk about engine troubles though, this is new info to me.
Next