Chinese Saab Story, Updated

Thor Johnsen
by Thor Johnsen

I’ve been prowling the autoblogosphere today re: the Saab SAIC deal. Besides the obvious concerns about fear of production and technology moving out of Sweden, comments and speculations are mainly positive. The unions are happy, says Chairman of the United Metalworkers, Paul Åkerlund. “Lovely to be done with this discussion, now its time to look forward.” The Chairman of the union, Annette Hellgren, is similarly copacetic. “There are always question around Chinese owners, as with our neighbor in Gothenburg (Volvo), but with this deal, we don’t have to worry – that feels good.” In their opinion, we’re talking Chinese money, access to the Chinese Market, and no Chinese interference with management or product development. (Minor stake in Koenigsegg Group, remember?) As the old Swedish aphorism says, “Döm ej allt du ser, Tro ej allt du hör, Gör ej allt du kan, Säg ej allt du vet, Förtär ej allt du har, Låt ingen veta vad du har i hjärtat eller pungen.” Make the jump for the translation and more news . . .

“Do not judge all you see, do not believe all you hear, do not do all you can, do not say all you know, do not eat all you have, let no one know what you have in your heart or in your wallet.”

Speaking of wallets . . .

In an interview to Aftenposten, investor Bård Eker expressed joy and relief, but also frustration with slow bureaucratic processes. They’re in a hurry alright; “we’re talking hours and days, not weeks and months.”

So the only real concern is whether the deal will go through or not. A Memorandum of Understanding is not a legally binding contract; it isn’t good enough to secure that crucial loan from European Investment Bank (EIB).

According to e24.se, if Saab receives EIB loans, the new company will be kept on a tight leash. Research, development and innovation, namely intellectual property rights such as patents, must be owned and conducted by an entity within the EU. In addition, “most [of this work] must be conducted in Europe,” said EIB Vice Manager Eva Srejber.

According to Trollhättan-area’s local news site ttela.se, Amnesty International stated a cause for concern to Koenigsegg, demanding a similar work force policy in an eventual assembly factory in China as there is in Trollhättan.

“We take no stand for or against Swedish establishments dealing with non-democratic countries. But we think that any business that enters into a partnership with China should be familiar with how things looks like in the Chinese industry,” Amnesty International press secretary Elisabeth Löfgren said. “Companies should not operate with double standards. Compliance with the Swedish labor law in Sweden should not be lower in the foreign operations and by its subcontractors. Saab is in a huge mess. But it is nevertheless important that there are set demands to Koenigsegg in this respect.”

Thor Johnsen
Thor Johnsen

More by Thor Johnsen

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 11 comments
  • Stuki Stuki on Sep 14, 2009

    Zeke, At or near the top of the list for consumer computers and electronics need not mean good quality in absolute terms. Not saying anything's wrong with Apple's quality, but McDonalds may well be at or near the top of the list for healthiness amongst hawkers of dirt cheap fast food.

  • ZekeToronto ZekeToronto on Sep 14, 2009

    stuki: That may be true, but on a practical level what it means is that you can't buy anything any better. So what's the point of discussing "quality" that doesn't exist or isn't attainable? Don't get me wrong--I'm not one of those Apple fanboys that leaps to their defense whenever the subject comes up, but Charly's statement that Apple isn't know for quality just doesn't jive with the facts. See Consumer Reports for example.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next