E85 Boondoggle of the Day: E85's Future Still Up in the Air

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

The E85 industry has a problem. Well, a bunch of problems: corn prices, water supplies, environmental impact, flagging political support for subsidies, limited access to the marketplace and profitability. Yes, there is that. Or, more precisely, there isn’t that. If only the feds could find a way to force the country to use the corn juice . . . I’ll see your mandatory E10 and raise however hell as much as I can get away with. The thing of it is: when there’s a choice, people aren’t buying E85. What’s left of the ethanol industry post-gas price drop has convinced itself that it suffers from a near-lethal perception gap. (Remember: no one ever died defending a corn field.) As we recently reported, the Department of Energy is spending $2 million of federal funds to help you discover that E85 isn’t really cheaper when you factor-in the mpg drop. Anyway, Evolution Fuels has announced that it wants some of that taxpayer loot.

Here’s the wind-up . . . here’s the pitch . . .

According to the Renewable Fuels Association, there is currently 12.5 billion gallons of annual ethanol production capacity, of which 2 billion is idle. The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), passed by Congress in December 2007, increased the minimum quantity of renewable fuel required to be blended into gasoline from 9 billion gallons in 2008 to 36 billion gallons by 2022. Where is it going to go? The industry will need a plan to incentivize the distribution and retailing of the product. A great deal of work has been done in this regard and overall achievement is not as distant as some might have you believe. Tests and research has been conducted by groups in collaboration with the DOE that show blends of up to 20% ethanol can be used in most legacy automobiles.

So, how about some more DOE-funded Evolutionary FUD? We shall see.

Meanwhile, E85 plant builders Fagen Inc. may also claim a turn on the teat. They’re the ethanol boosters behind acrobatic pilot Greg Poe, currently winging his way to the Selfridge Air Show. Poe’s MX-2 Thunder is powered by—and festooned with promotions for—E85. Presumably. ‘Cause if we doubted that we’d have to wonder about this statement from Poe’s website: “Every Fagen built plant is a financial success.”

[NB: Any connection between the soundtrack of this video and the previous post on Savannah Stern are purely coincidental.]

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 10 comments
  • E85_STi E85_STi on Aug 11, 2009

    Indy racecars, American Lemans racecars, GP Moto racebikes and moonshiners all share commonalities, including: 1. They think stuffed industry shirts who pimp for Big Oil make great Buick Lucerne spokespersons; 2. Everything they need to know about life pretty much sprang from a 3rd grade science class where they got to make 190 proof ethyl alcohol; 3. Higher compression engines are more fun to drive and work on than lower; 4. Now that police forces are retrofitting/switching to ethanol powered fleets, they'll have to up their game; 5. Don't give a rat's turd if ethanol production takes 2 lbs of inedible sugar @ pennies a pound, 10 gallons of water @ pennies a gallon, old beer or yeast @ less than pennies to produce several gallons of E100 ... 6. Willing to turn maybe 30 cents worth of materials into a full-tank of torque-doubling/low temperature burning/40-60+ percent cleaner; 7. They think that the renewable fuel mandate is the smartest thing since the brazilian bikini

  • John Williams John Williams on Aug 12, 2009
    "If only the feds could find a way to force the country to use the corn juice . . . I’ll see your mandatory E10 and raise however hell as much as I can get away with." Wonderful. Then I get to see my fuel economy dip even further. It's bad enough I see 16.5 when I should be seeing just about 18. Let's go ahead and sink that bad boy to about 14ish. I had enough of that shit when I had my Brougham.
  • Jeff Self driving cars are not ready for prime time.
  • Lichtronamo Watch as the non-us based automakers shift more production to Mexico in the future.
  • 28-Cars-Later " Electrek recently dug around in Tesla’s online parts catalog and found that the windshield costs a whopping $1,900 to replace.To be fair, that’s around what a Mercedes S-Class or Rivian windshield costs, but the Tesla’s glass is unique because of its shape. It’s also worth noting that most insurance plans have glass replacement options that can make the repair a low- or zero-cost issue. "Now I understand why my insurance is so high despite no claims for years and about 7,500 annual miles between three cars.
  • AMcA My theory is that that when the Big 3 gave away the store to the UAW in the last contract, there was a side deal in which the UAW promised to go after the non-organized transplant plants. Even the UAW understands that if the wage differential gets too high it's gonna kill the golden goose.
  • MKizzy Why else does range matter? Because in the EV advocate's dream scenario of a post-ICE future, the average multi-car household will find itself with more EVs in their garages and driveways than places to plug them in or the capacity to charge then all at once without significant electrical upgrades. Unless each vehicle has enough range to allow for multiple days without plugging in, fighting over charging access in multi-EV households will be right up there with finances for causes of domestic strife.
Next