Another Day, Another Dubious Satisfaction Survey Lauding Detroit

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

While Automotive News [sub] trumpets the fact that “Cadillac Joins Lexus atop Study of Customer Satisfaction,” our experience with all manner of stat house slickery behooves us to dig a little deeper into the subject. [ “league table” here.] While we eagerly await Mr. Karesh’s analytical evisceration, I’d like to share some relevant facts. First, although the “see there IS a perception gap” study is called the American Customer Satisfaction Index™, it hails from the University of Michigan. Second, it’s a racket. The academics behind the index charge companies a $35K “corporate subscription price.” If you don’t work in automotive, no problem! The ACSI covers 44 industries! Oh, and the US government. Third, methodology (as above) . . .

The indexes (shown in the diagram above) are multivariable components measured by several questions that are weighted within the model. The questions assess customer evaluations of the determinants of each index. Indexes are reported on a 0 to 100 scale. The survey and modeling methodology quantifies the strength of the effect of the index on the left to the one to which the arrow points on the right. These arrows represent “impacts.” The ACSI model is self-weighting to maximize the explanation of customer satisfaction (ACSI) on customer loyalty. Looking at the indexes and impacts, users can determine which drivers of satisfaction, if improved, would have the most effect on customer loyalty.

Confused? You should be. Suffice it to say, the man behind the program, Claes Fornell, loves him some Wall Street. Wikipedia: “He is also the lead author of a Journal of Marketing article linking satisfaction performance to stock market growth, demonstrating that a portfolio of firms with high ACSI scores consistently outperforms the market.” That’s got to help his people sell some of them $35K subs, eh?

I wonder if anyone’s ever measured ASCI’s customer satisfaction? I know one guy they should/shouldn’t talk to: Mark Fields. USA Today‘s unquestioning coverage of this domestic heartening stat-fest ends with a quote from Ford’s el presidente de las Americas.

I think in our case, the consumers are seeing new products, they’re seeing information from third parties on our quality, and it’s all raising awareness,” he says. “All of this highlighting in the media every day is helpful to us, given that we have the evidence to back up our claims.”

Define evidence.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 17 comments
  • MichaelJ MichaelJ on Aug 18, 2009

    Detroit Todd: Without even hearing from Mr. Karesh, you assume he’s going to tear this survey to shreds, Hulk-style? Of course the expectation is that Mr. Karesh will tear the survey to shreds. After all, UofM must be biased to the domestics simply because of their location, right? Therefore Mr. Karesh must be biased to this site and will agree with the prevailing preconception here that everything domestic is bad... "Another day, another dubious satisfaction survey lauding Detroit." Implies these are coming in daily. How many such dubiousnessosities does it take before maybe...maybe...possibly...there's a little glint of acceptance that they're not actually wrong? I sure wish we could start seeing the honorable truthful non-biased scientific surveys that agree with the sentiment here that Detroit=crap and imports are perfect.

  • Happy_Endings Happy_Endings on Aug 18, 2009

    It all goes back to the old Onion headline; 98% of statistics are made up on the spot.

  • Thomas Same here....but keep in mind that EVs are already much more efficient than ICE vehicles. They need to catch up in all the other areas you mentioned.
  • Analoggrotto It's great to see TTAC kicking up the best for their #1 corporate sponsor. Keep up the good work guys.
  • John66ny Title about self driving cars, linked podcast about headlight restoration. Some relationship?
  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could make in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well. Compact trucks are a great vehicle for those who want an open bed for hauling but what a smaller more affordable efficient practical vehicle.
  • Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
Next