Opel Watch: Buyback Is a Bitch

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

A month ago, we reported that GM offered to buy back Opel some day “when we do better after a restructuring phase.” Offered? GM downright demands the right to buy back Opel after a buyer has successfully resuscitated and restructured Opel.

The rumors of such a demand have been around for a while. GM is pretty much the only one on the planet who thinks this is a swell idea.

A week ago, Belgium’s Standard headlined “GM dringt aan op terugkoopmogelijkheid voor Opel” — any child knows that this means “GM demands buy back option for Opel.” A few days later, Roland Koch, premier of Opel’s home state Hesse sent a “ clear response of opposition” to that plan. GM should listen to Herr Koch, because without his support, no deal.

Either GM didn’t get the memo, or they are hard of hearing. One can understand that they are having problems understanding Dutch or Deutsch (or Flemish). So today, Canada’s Globe & Mail puts it in plain English: “GM push for buyback could halt Magna’s Opel bid.” It’s not too hard to understand that the buyback demand is a deal breaker. The Globe & Mail spells it out:

Magna, which is leading a joint bid with Sberbank of Russia to take a controlling stake in Opel, does not want to perform the difficult and lengthy task of repairing the auto maker and restoring it to profitability, only to be forced to sell the division back to General Motors in a few years, people close to the negotiations said yesterday.

As evidenced by Herrn Koch’s reaction, the German government would also take a dim view of any clause allowing GM to buy back Opel. Germany goes by old Admiralty law and claims salvage rights, German style: We save the wreck, we keep it.

According to the usual source close to the matter, the buyback clause was added after the original memorandum of understanding was signed between Magna, GM and the German government in May. “If General Motors changes the game, then Magna will walk away,” the source said.

The buyback imbroglio may explain why GM resurrected other bidders, such as RHJ and China’s BAIC. BAIC probably will say “bu hao” (no good) to the request, and would (once alone) call the GM negotiators “250s” (the Chinese way of saying that someone is three cans short of a sixpack.) RHJ could possibly go for it—if the price is right. But they need the help of the German government, and their answer is: “Nein. Keine Rückkaufklausel.”

The Frankfurter Allgemeine doesn’t think that the buyback clause is a deal breaker. Why? It may not have occurred to GM that they don’t own Opel anymore. 65 percent of Opel are in trusteeship, precondition for the €1.5 billion bridge loan the German government gave. If GM continues to play games, the trustees just may make a decision.

Update: Reuters reports that suitor RHJ posted a sharply wider full-year loss and a 43 percent fall in the value of its portfolio, and most likely will not have the money to buy Opel.

“RHJ can’t acquire a majority stake or a large minority in Opel, because they simply don’t have the cash — RHJ doesn’t even come close,” KBC Securities analyst Tom Simonts told Reuters.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 7 comments
  • Paris-dakar Paris-dakar on Jul 01, 2009

    This reads like something from The Onion. They may not have money, brains, leadership, direction, a plan or even a future, but they have a huge reserve of arrogance. No kidding.

  • Johnny ro Johnny ro on Jul 01, 2009

    GM would be doing Magna a favor to drive them off.

  • TheEndlessEnigma Of course they should unionize. US based automotive production component production and auto assembly plants with unionized memberships produce the highest quality products in the automotive sector. Just look at the high quality products produced by GM, Ford and Chrysler!
  • Redapple2 Got cha. No big.
  • Theflyersfan The wheel and tire combo is tragic and the "M Stripe" has to go, but overall, this one is a keeper. Provided the mileage isn't 300,000 and the service records don't read like a horror novel, this could be one of the last (almost) unmodified E34s out there that isn't rotting in a barn. I can see this ad being taken down quickly due to someone taking the chance. Recently had some good finds here. Which means Monday, we'll see a 1999 Honda Civic with falling off body mods from Pep Boys, a rusted fart can, Honda Rot with bad paint, 400,000 miles, and a biohazard interior, all for the unrealistic price of $10,000.
  • Theflyersfan Expect a press report about an expansion of VW's Mexican plant any day now. I'm all for worker's rights to get the best (and fair) wages and benefits possible, but didn't VW, and for that matter many of the Asian and European carmaker plants in the south, already have as good of, if not better wages already? This can drive a wedge in those plants and this might be a case of be careful what you wish for.
  • Jkross22 When I think about products that I buy that are of the highest quality or are of great value, I have no idea if they are made as a whole or in parts by unionized employees. As a customer, that's really all I care about. When I think about services I receive from unionized and non-unionized employees, it varies from C- to F levels of service. Will unionizing make the cars better or worse?
Next