By on July 28, 2009

The list of CAFE violators (in PDF form) reads like a valet’s to-do list: Mercedes, Porsche, Ferrari, Maserati. These firms pay CAFE fines because, well, they can. CAFE fines are calculated by multiplying each tenth of a mile per gallon of average non-compliance by $5.50, then multiplying that dollar amount by the number of vehicles sold. As a result, luxury firms pay the highest fines when they try to go mass market: Merecedes paid about $30 million for 2007. But if CAFE is already weighted to let small companies off the hook, why are we hearing about new rules which seem to relax standards for firms selling fewer than 400k vehicles per term? Aren’t the regular loopholes enough?

The answer takes a little digging to find, but it explains everything. Proposed rules for the 2011-2015 standard (PDF) reveal that

EPCA authorizes increasing the civil penalty up to $10.00, exclusive of inflationary adjustments, if NHTSA decides that the increase in the penalty—

(i) will result in, or substantially further, substantial energy
conservation for automobiles in model years in which the increased
penalty may be imposed; and
(ii) will not have a substantial deleterious impact on the economy of the
United States, a State, or a region of a State.

Doubling the CAFE fine would force the small firms to finally get serious about efficiency . . . unless there were a loophole. Hence the loophole.

Of course, that’s not going to be enough come the day when greenhouse gasses become a regulated pollutant under the Clean Air Act. As proposed rules for CAFE/GHG coordination explain:

failure to meet the standards after credit opportunities are exhausted would ultimately result in the potential for penalties under [Energy Policy and Conservation Act] (CAFE), and under the [Clean Air Act] as well. The CAA allows considerable discretion in assessment of penalties. Penalties under the CAA are typically determined on a vehicle-specific basis by determining the number of a manufacturer’s highest emitting vehicles that caused the fleet average standard violation. This is the same mechanism used for EPA’s National LEV and Tier 2 corporate average standards, and to date there have been no instances of noncompliance.

In short, fines are going to double, and the risk of a Clean Air Act violation lawsuit means non-compliant firms face double jeopardy.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

6 Comments on “Daily Podcast: CAFE Culture...”


  • avatar
    SunnyvaleCA

    The $5.50 is meaningless to the likes of Mercedes, Porsche, Ferrari, Maserati. Changing it to $10 will still be meaningless. In fact, since those vehicles are already expensive (and not just because of the big engines), a higher fine will put them at a competitive advantage compared to big 3 muscle cars, which are expensive only because of their powerful engines.

    Even at $10 per tenth of a MPG, a $1000 fine buys you a 10 MPG waiver. Cars currently benching 17 MPG are already paying several thousand in gas guzzling fines.

  • avatar
    RGS920

    Of course, the companies that are fined merely pass the addional cost of doing business in the USA on to the consumer. So your Benz would be a couple 100 cheaper if it weren’t for CAFE.

    It’s also interesting to note from a purely economic standpoint that with exotic car companies, the CAFE fines will do nothing to curb pollution. Is a potential Farrari owner going to be deterred from buying a Ferrari merely because it costs an extra couple thousand of dollars? It actually could have the opposite effect. With hyper exotics, the more expensive the car is, the more desirable it is. The point being that I bet the low volume exotic car companies couldn’t care what the Cafe fines are.

    Cafe fines only get interesting once you get to the high volume sellers. To date no American car company has ever paid a Cafe fine. With the raised standards, I wonder how that is going to effect the bottomlines of the “new” GM and Chrysler if they decide once again not to be competative in the small car market.

  • avatar
    Robert Schwartz

    Maybe the Feds are more interested in collecting the money, than in environmental virtue.

  • avatar
    dean

    Like we’ve said before, this an exceptionally complex way of getting the same thing you can get out of a simple gas tax.

    • 0 avatar
      golden2husky

      Except that with a gas tax, you pay a penalty regardless of mileage of your car and do so every time you fill your tank.  Other methods (CAFE, mileage based registration surcharges) only penalize those who choose to purchase a lower efficiency vehicle…a proposition that I find more fair.

  • avatar
    50merc

    Correct, dean, and under this law the bureaucracy has the “discretion” to be judge, jury and executioner.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: Nair: Ford Hard At Work On F-150 Hybrid

    DenverMike - It has nothing to do with the engine length. With rounded and aero bumpers and lights, followed by the wheel well that’s right up against the...
  • Re: Question Of The Day: What Do You Drive?

    Mandalorian - I had a rental LTZ recently. Pretty good car. My criticism was the seat bottoms seemed flat and hard.
  • Re: Question Of The Day: What Do You Drive?

    doublechili - 2007 Honda Civic SI 4dr sdn. I’ve never had a car this long, and still really enjoy driving it. The 6MT is a joy every day. After having a few...
  • Re: Question Of The Day: What Do You Drive?

    Beerboy12 - Ok I will play. In our garage now. 2014 Subaru Forester, 2.5L Premium 6 speed manual, grey because I wanted the dark interior. It has the winter package...
  • Re: Question Of The Day: What Do You Drive?

    Maymar - Currently jammed in one parking spot; ’14 Mazda2 GX 5-Spd – fun for a commuter car, if you like the idea of thrashing something constantly,...
  • Re: Question Of The Day: What Do You Drive?

    DenverMike - Current ’69 Cougar XR7 ’84 SVO ’96 F-350 ’04 F-150 SC Past notable ’78 Olds Delta 88 diesel ’79 5.0 Mustang...
  • Re: Question Of The Day: What Do You Drive?

    vettefan427 - Daily driver: 2008 Cadillac STS Workhorse: 1991 Ford F-150, XLT Lariat (5.8L) 2 wheeled fun: 1) 2014 Harley Streetbob 2) 2005 Yamaha XT225
  • Re: Question Of The Day: What Do You Drive?

    CedarvaleRedMustang - Current: 2012 Mustang GT California convert, 6-speed V-8. 2012 Toyota FJ Cruiser Trail Teams, 6-speed. 2010 Mazda RX-8 6-spd, (OK this is...
  • Re: Question Of The Day: What Do You Drive?

    Synchromesh - Currently have a strange mix of vehicles: 2012 Subaru WRX 1972 VW Super Beetle 1974 Porsche 914 All have a flat-4! Past cars: 2000 Integra GS-R sedan...
  • Re: Question Of The Day: What Do You Drive?

    vvk - Current: 2003 BMW 325i M Sport 5MT 2010 BMW 550i M Sport 6MT (kiddie mobile) 2005 Mercedes SLK350 Sport 6MT Past: 2012 VW Passat S 5MT 1996 Buick Century...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributing Writers

  • Jack Baruth, United States
  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Vojta Dobes, Czech Republic
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Cameron Aubernon, United States
  • J Emerson, United States