Honda Dives 39.2 Percent, Toyota Down 38.4 Percent

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Gosh that sounds bad, doesn’t it? Honda’s silver lining is (sorta) legit though, since the big H set an all-time sales record in May 2008. Toyota has no such excuse. Besides, falling sales are salling sales. So let’s put the lipstick away, and take a good, hard look at this pig.

Honda’s stats reflect the steep declines in car sales (-47.6) and shallower drop in truck sales (21.2) we’re seeing elsewhere. Acura (-34) also did better month-on-month than the Honda brand (-39.7). Of course this means that Accord and Civic were way down, clocking-in at -46.3 percent and -59.6 percent respectively. Honda’s new Insight hybrid had a relatively strong showing, however, with 2,780 moving off the lot last month. The Honda Odyssey (-2.9 percent) and Pilot (-8.9 percent) were relatively steady, with the Element (-46.7) and Ridgeline (-56.6) leading truck declines. Acura’s best performers were TL (-18.4) and RDX (-23.8).

Toyota’s core brand also did worse than its Lexus luxury brand, which fell 33.9 percent to Toyota’s 39 percent drop. There wasn’t as much discrepancy between cars and trucks for ToMoCo though, with cars falling 37.6 percent and trucks down 38.3 percent. Meanwhile, all Scion models have seen sales drop by at least 50 percent since last year. The box-fresh Venza sold 4,745 units in one of its first sales months, while the Lexus GS sold just 516.

Otherwise, Toyota and Lexus passenger vehicles saw sales fall between 32.2 percent (Corolla) and 62 percent (Lexus SC). On the “truck” front, the RAV-4 and Lexus RX stayed strong-ish with “only” 14.4 percent and 9.7 percent drops in sales respectively. The 4Runner is falling off badly with a 60 percent drop. Land Cruiser, FJ Cruiser and Tundra aren’t far behind, with sales of all three down by over 50 percent.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 65 comments
  • Long126mike Long126mike on Jun 07, 2009
    No, it is not. Yes, it is. There is no grand conspiracy involved to make your very precious Aveo look bad.
  • M1EK M1EK on Jun 08, 2009

    BTW, don't assume we don't have any experience with the Aveo. I've been stuck with two now on business trips.

  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
Next