By on June 1, 2009

“Today,” writes GM CEO Fritz Henderson at his firm’s Fastlane Blog, “marks a defining moment in the history of General Motors.” And it’s true. GM has literally been skidding towards this day for decades. And though June 1, 2009 should have come years ago, it seems that there’s one possible benefit to its long, expensive delay. In this blog-driven year, GM knows that it can’t expect public largess without giving up some corporate privacy. That, or as a publicly-owned institution, GM is now subject to the Freedom Of Information Act. Either way, our tens of billions of tax dollars have bought American taxpayers an opportunity. An opportunity to webchat. Again.

“We’re committed to open communications and I am personally putting a high priority on transparency. One way we’ll do this is by launching a series of live web chats on this website. I’ll kick things off later this week for one hour on Thursday, June 4 at 3 p.m. EST. Following me, a steady stream of GM leaders from throughout the company will host additional chats, about two a week, on whatever topics are of most concern to you.”

Given that the rest of Henderson’s post is a roiling sea of “new,” “competitive,” “better” and similarly aspirational adjectives, one probably shouldn’t hold out hope for too much clear-eyed candor. Still, if the blogosphere has one immutable law, it’s this: ask questions when you have the chance. Even if you get a bunch of puckey, it’s what the journalists refer to as “primary-source puckey.” Straight from the horse’s orifice. Twice a week. Live from bankruptcy court. How great is that?

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

4 Comments on “Henderson Promises “Transparency,” Web-Chat...”


  • avatar
    indi500fan

    A fresh Rasmussen poll says 67% of Americans oppose the GM bailout. If that translates into purchasing decisions, not a good consumer base to build on.

    OTOH if the fedgov truly lays on the “mother of all incentives” (as Bill Griffeth of CNBC calls it) there may be some screaming deals.

    Stay tuned.

  • avatar
    Redbarchetta

    Wow 67% is better then the 75-80% of the market that has no interest in buying from them.

    Didn’t they give us this line about transparancy months ago and using their blogs to answer questions, I don’t expect this to be any different from that last farce. Same clowns running the show giving us the same old circus act.

  • avatar
    Potemkin

    Like Leikanger’s vision of GM as the old Soviet Union here we have another example of “all show no go”. Henderson has started a new bureau for Potemkin Village construction. People who could be doing something productive will be assigned to bullshit the public. Will they never learn?

  • avatar
    DweezilSFV

    Deeper faster harder. Transparently.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: Toyota May Kill V6 Camry

    Frantz - Well “no” isn’t very accurate as I both acknowledged the redesign as a variable and I also correctly stated my observations on the sales floor. More...
  • Re: Piston Slap: The Express’ New Mission?

    PrincipalDan - (Note: I’m not really a narcissist; a Celebrity 208 cc was my first boat.) Man, I thought your first car was a Celebrity. (Had no idea what the...
  • Re: Reader Review: 2014 Mazda6

    Wraith - Edmunds actually made a post about the 3′s road noise as part of their long term road test: http://www.edmunds.com/mazda/m azda3/2014/long-term-road-t...
  • Re: Toyota May Kill V6 Camry

    28-Cars-Later - “When properly maintained” There is about as much chance of that happening with mainstream buyers as their is changing the S/C oil.
  • Re: Toyota May Kill V6 Camry

    PrincipalDan - As the owner of a 3.5 ltr V6 Highlander the V6 is the best darn thing about it. Smooth power and torque, engine and transmission are matched well, and on a recent...
  • Re: Toyota May Kill V6 Camry

    nickoo - Those late 70s gm v6s were awful. Unbalanced so bad they shook the whole car at all speeds, low power, low reliability, low milage. My mom had a v6 skylark, my dad had a...
  • Re: Piston Slap: The Express’ New Mission?

    johnhowington - GOOD tires and brake pads/rotors. I’ve read those vans are notoriously horrific to drive. good luck.
  • Re: Toyota May Kill V6 Camry

    bomberpete - Years ago when I drove coast-to-coast in a presser Mitsubishi, my old man couldn’t believe I’d do such a thing in a four-cylinder engine. He had a hard...
  • Re: Toyota May Kill V6 Camry

    28-Cars-Later - No of the MY13s+. I see many more of the MY10-12s, probably a dozen in a two week period. There is a Ford dealer in Washington Co who puts them out very cheap,...
  • Re: Toyota May Kill V6 Camry

    Sky_Render - “Fans of the Toyota Camry”? I assume the demographic you’re referring to has a large overlap with AARP membership.

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Authors

  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • Tycho de Feyter, China
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Faisal Ali Khan, India