Ford, Nissan, Tesla First to Dine at DoE Bailout Buffet
Ford may “just say ‘no’” to TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program) money that puts them under the control of the PTFOA (Presidential Task Force on Automobiles), but the other wise acronym-aversive automaker doesn’t mind bellying up to the DoE’s (Department of Energy) bailout buffet. Bloomberg‘s mysterious “people familiar with the plans” say Ford, Nissan and Tesla will all dine upon loans from the “original” bailout package: the $25 billion feast created by the 2007 energy bill. The loans were intended to “help automakers boost fleetwide fuel economy.” In February, the DoE said they’d received 75 applications, totaling $38 billion. According to Bloomies, Ford, Nissan and Tesla are the first to get the handouts loans.
Ford’s asking for $5 billion, including almost a half billion to convert a Michigan factory that builds SUVs to build small cars. Tesla wants $450 million to develop its Model S and “expand a drive train business that sells parts to other automakers.” Nissan (the only foreign-based automaker to apply for the loans) said they’d requested “an unspecified amount,” but in a separate story Bloomberg states Nissan plans to start building electric cars in their Smyrna, Tennessee, plant, and that can’t be cheap to get going.
So why aren’t GM and Chrysler hoovering this buffet too? Ay, there’s the rub. To participate, a company must “be financially viable.” Those pesky bankruptcy proceedings kind of put a damper on this party. Whether they’ll be eligible to forage for the scraps left over once everyone else gets their share and the dust has settled from their “reorganizations” is yet to be decided. But I’m betting the Congressional kitchen will get busy cooking up a sumptuous second course for them if they just ask.
More by Frank Williams
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Calrson Fan Jeff - Agree with what you said. I think currently an EV pick-up could work in a commercial/fleet application. As someone on this site stated, w/current tech. battery vehicles just do not scale well. EBFlex - No one wanted to hate the Cyber Truck more than me but I can't ignore all the new technology and innovative thinking that went into it. There is a lot I like about it. GM, Ford & Ram should incorporate some it's design cues into their ICE trucks.
- Michael S6 Very confusing if the move is permanent or temporary.
- Jrhurren Worked in Detroit 18 years, live 20 minutes away. Ren Cen is a gem, but a very terrible design inside. I’m surprised GM stuck it out as long as they did there.
- Carson D I thought that this was going to be a comparison of BFGoodrich's different truck tires.
- Tassos Jong-iL North Korea is saving pokemon cards and amibos to buy GM in 10 years, we hope.
Comments
Join the conversation
Oh brother. Did you ever take out a small-business loan? Federal college loan? Collect unemployment? Accept a government voucher for a digital TV converter? Claim a tax credit for a charitable donation? Send a letter using the (subsidized) US Postal Service? Participate in any government-funded program or loan that is designed to influence your behavior? Then you, too, have dined at the bailout buffet! You are just as bad as Ford. The real issue here is how the government is going about promoting improved vehicle fuel economy. Instead of taking the efficient but politically toxic path of raising the gas tax, we get this byzantine combination of CAFE regulations to force automakers to change what they build, followed by low-interest loans to enable them to do so--since as long as gas prices remain low, the market will not support the high-mileage cars that the regulations require. Yes, it is foolishness on the part of the government, but that foolishness exists because the public overall is not willing to tolerate straight talk or direct action.