Flashback: 1955 Bentley S1 Fastback Mulliner

Mike Solowiow
by Mike Solowiow

In order to show visiting US Air Force Academy cadets the wonders of Europe, I ditched my Carrera, whose back seats are merely a nice gesture, for a lumbering Mercedes-Benz GLK. After four hours of driving the speed limited Autoroutes, we arrived at the Eiffel Tower, to throngs of drunk rugby fans celebrating the USAP win that day. Leaving the Mardi Gras spectacle we wandered around the veritable maze of streets that constitute the Seventh Arrondissement. Dodging rugby hooligans whose intentions seemed suspect (as some of us were wearing the opposing team colors), I never expected to stumble upon something so beautiful, so elegant, so alien as a 1955 Bentley S1 Fastback Mulliner parked on a curb in a hidden away section of Paris.

The lines of the car stood out amongst the dented French hatchbacks strewn down the boulevard as if Parisians hadn’t a care in the world, least of all parking etiquette. Even a nearby Alfa Romeo Brera looked like the jilted prom date in comparison. I stopped in silence, unable to conjure thought to even recognize what it was until one of the cadets shouted out “OH, WOW! A Duesenburg!”

Well, not quite, young grasshopper. The pronounced fenders, the swept back end resembling a Buck Rogers space ship, and the intricate chrome work rivaling Tolkien’s elves all spoke post-War, bespoke coach builder awesomeness. It wasn’t until we meandered around to the upright grill that we realized it was a Bentley, with its wings proudly mounted on the prow of the road-going automotive artwork.

Using that wonderful invention called the iPhone, which has Google, I discovered it was an incredibly rare Bentley manufactured from 1955-1959 under the auspices of Rolls-Royce. The coupe version by Mulliner Bodyworks the rarest of all, to the tune of fewer than 200 examples ever built. Underneath the impossibly long hood lay an engine block designed soon after the war, the first war. Originally powering the Rolls-Royce 20, from 1922, the 4.9L straight-6 produced enough power to waft 0-100kmh in 13 seconds to a top speed of 103mph. Which immediately underwhelmed me.

The profile, the lines, the 1950s sci-fi tributes all made it seem as if it should at least have the balls to outrun a 4-cylinder Camry, or at least a Peugeot 106 diesel.

And then, as the owner shooed us away, started up a beast of primeval origins, and literally glided down the street as if possessed by the souls of Frank Sinatra and Humphrey Bogart, I realized, the Bentley didn’t need horsepower. It exuded that intangible prowess every car ever to call itself “passionately styled” (cough, BMW, cough) has attempted to ingrain in its exterior.

I for one count myself lucky to not only have seen but to have heard and witnessed one in motion. I salute the owner, who not only drives such a fantastic piece of history, but parks it on the street as if its only a “normal” car, instead of having it interred at the Louvre, in the English art section.

Mike Solowiow
Mike Solowiow

More by Mike Solowiow

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 28 comments
  • Paul Niedermeyer Paul Niedermeyer on Jun 17, 2009

    Nicodemus, Thanks for the detail info. I thought (and said so above) that it was an R-type Conti. One of my all time favs. Right color too.

  • Nicodemus Nicodemus on Jun 17, 2009

    No worries Paul. BTW there's two easy ways to tell the difference. First is the side on which the fuel filler flap is placed. R-type Continentals have it on the left, whilst S1s (&S2&S3s) have them on the right. The second way to tell (from the front) is the shape of the air vent under the headlamps. The R-types have round ones whilst the S series (and the RR Silver Clouds on which they're based) have long oval vents.

  • Wjtinfwb My comment about "missing the mark" was directed at, of the mentioned cars, none created huge demand or excitement once they were introduced. All three had some cool aspects; Thunderbird was pretty good exterior, let down by the Lincoln LS dash and the fairly weak 3.9L V8 at launch. The Prowler was super cool and unique, only the little nerf bumpers spoiled the exterior and of course the V6 was a huge letdown. SSR had the beans, but in my opinion was spoiled by the tonneau cover over the bed. Remove the cover, finish the bed with some teak or walnut and I think it could have been more appealing. All three were targeting a very small market (expensive 2-seaters without a prestige badge) which probably contributed. The PT Cruiser succeeded in this space by being both more practical and cheap. Of the three, I'd still like to have a Thunderbird in my garage in a classic color like the silver/green metallic offered in the later years.
  • D Screw Tesla. There are millions of affordable EVs already in use and widely available. Commonly seen in Peachtree City, GA, and The Villages, FL, they are cheap, convenient, and fun. We just need more municipalities to accept them. If they'll allow AVs on the road, why not golf cars?
  • ChristianWimmer Best-looking current BMW in my opinion.
  • Analoggrotto Looks like a cheap Hyundai.
  • Honda1 It really does not matter. The way bidenomics is going nobody will be able to afford shyt.
Next