Automobile Dealer Economic Rights Restoration Act of 2009

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

HR 2743 IH

111th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 2743

To restore the economic rights of automobile dealers, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

June 8, 2009

Mr. MAFFEI (for himself, Mr. KRATOVIL, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. HOYER, Mr. MCMAHON, Ms. SUTTON, Mr. BARTLETT, Mr. HALL of New York, Mr. POSEY, Mr. HEINRICH, Mr. PAULSEN, Ms. SHEA-PORTER, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. DEFAZIO, and Mr. DAVIS of Alabama) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

A BILL

To restore the economic rights of automobile dealers, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘Automobile Dealer Economic Rights Restoration Act of 2009’.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

The Congress finds the following:

(1) Automobile dealers are an asset to automobile manufacturers that make it possible to serve communities and sell automobiles nationally.

(2) Forcing the closure of automobile dealers would have an especially devastating economic impact in rural communities, where dealers play an integral role in the community, provide essential services and serve as a critical economic engine.

(3) The manufacturers obtain the benefits from having a national dealer network at no material cost to the manufacturers.

(4) Historically, automobile dealers have had franchise agreement protections under State law.

SEC. 3. RESTORATION OF ECONOMIC RIGHTS.

(a) In order to protect assets of the Federal Government and better assure the viability of automobile manufacturers in which the Federal Government has an ownership interest, or to which it is a lender, an automobile manufacturer in which the Federal Government has an ownership interest, or which receives loans from the Federal Government, may not deprive an automobile dealer of its economic rights and shall honor those rights as they existed, for Chrysler LLC dealers, prior to the commencement of the bankruptcy case by Chrysler LLC on April 30, 2009, and for General Motors Corp. dealers, prior to the commencement of the bankruptcy case by General Motors Corp. on June 1, 2009, including the dealer’s rights to recourse under State law.

(b) In order to preserve economic rights pursuant to subsection (a), at the request of an automobile dealer, an automobile manufacturer covered under this Act shall restore the franchise agreement between that automobile dealer and Chrysler LLC or General Motors Corp. that was in effect prior to the commencement of their respective bankruptcy cases and take assignment of such agreements.

(c) Except as set forth herein, nothing in this Act is intended to make null and void:

(1) the court approved transfer of substantially all the assets of Chrysler LLC to New CarCo Acquisition LLC; or

(2) a transfer of substantially all the assets of General Motors Corp. that could be approved by a court after the date of introduction of this Act.


Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • Smithrobjr Smithrobjr on Jun 20, 2009

    Newsflash...miliatary bases are branches of the government, that cost money of the government. Car dealers are NOT OWNED by the factory. Dealers own the land, buildings, etc. They sell a product offered by a manufacturer. So what if they want to offer Dell & HP???? That's what this really is. Manufacturers don't want customers to shop and compare, they want dependent dealers, on one product, consumers be damned. Customers deserve better. My new favorite is Fritz Henderson telling congress they will save money when they don't have to pay for the prep of cars, or the gas fill up...huh? The prep is paid to the dealer by the manufacturer because 50 years ago Congress said that cars HAD to be prepped to make sure they were safe...it does with the CAR! Same with the gas, who sells is doesn't matter, it goes with the car.

  • DealerEmployeeNJ DealerEmployeeNJ on Jun 23, 2009

    Its a shame that some people who commented on here really have NO IDEA what Dealers mean to their communities. We are NOT owned by GM. Our Building, Land, Taxes, etc. are OWNED and PAID by the Dealer... that same dealer provides anywhere from 30-100 jobs in that community in which he/she resides. Take EACH Dealer that just GM is closing down: That is 2400 Dealers in the USA. Lets say for estimate purposes that each dealer employees 20 people in that town. That is 72,000 jobs LOST in AMERICA. Last time I checked, this was America. We need to support our local communites and KEEP jobs in America, not throw people out on their asses. The estimated proposed job loss for Chrysler & GM is approx 200,000 jobs LOST... this does not include the small businesses which these dealers support such as parts stores and local repair shops that we sell parts to. Most dealers being shut down have been family owned and operated for over 30 years... 50 years... some as long as 94 years! These are families with long time employees. IF this bill HR2473 is passed AND the Companion bill S1304 is passed, it will restore the rights of these dealers so that they can fend for themselves and SAVE their employees jobs. www.hometownautodealers.org This website was formed by the: Committee to Preserve Dealer Rights. You can check out that website to find out how to contact your local Senators and Congressmen/Congresswomen to tell them that you support this bill. It would be an absolute SHAME that people in AMERICA would not support the potential to save HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF JOBS...

  • 28-Cars-Later 2018 Toyota Auris: Pads front and back, K&N air filter and four tires @ 30K, US made Goodyears already seem inferior to JDM spec tires it came with. 36K on the clock.2004 Volvo C70: Somewhere between $6,5 to $8 in it all told, car was $3500 but with a wrecked fender, damaged hood, cracked glass headlight, and broken power window motor. Headlight was $80 from a yard, we bought a $100 door literally for the power window assembly, bodywork with fender was roughly a grand, brakes/pads, timing belt/coolant and pre-inspection was a grand. Roof later broke, parts/labor after two repair trips was probably about $1200-1500 my cost. Four 16in Cooper tires $62 apiece in 2022 from Wal Mart of all places, battery in 2021 $200, 6qts tranny fluid @ 20 is $120, maybe $200 in labor last year for tranny fluid change, oil change, and tire install. Car otherwise perfect, 43K on the clock found at 38.5K.1993 Volvo 244: Battery $65, four 15in Cooper tires @ $55 apiece, 4 alum 940 wheels @ roughly $45 apiece with shipping. Fixes for random leaks in power steering and fuel lines, don't remember. Needs rear door and further body work, rear door from yard in Gettysburg was $250 in 2022 (runs and drives fine, looks OK, I'm just a perfectionist). TMU, driven maybe 500 miles since re-acquisition in 2021.
  • 1995 SC I never hated these. Typical GM though. They put the wrong engine in it to start with, fixed it, and then killed it. I say that as a big fan of the aluminum 5.3, but for how they were marketing this it should have gotten the Corvette Motor at the start. Would be a nice cruiser though even with the little motor. The 5.3 without the convertible in a package meant to be used as a truck would have been great in my mind, but I suspect they'd have sold about 7 of them.
  • Rochester I'd rather have a slow-as-mud Plymouth Prowler than this thing. At least the Prowler looked cool.
  • Kcflyer Don't understand the appeal of this engine combo at all.
  • Dave M. This and the HHR were GM's "retro" failures. Not sure what they were smoking....
Next