Obama Continues Bush Push for Toll Roads

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

Despite early indications that the Obama Administration did not want to follow the toll road policies of the previous administration, the US Department of Transportation is spending millions in federal taxpayer dollars to encourage states to impose tolls on new and existing roads. On Monday, the DOT published formal rules for states interested in applying to receive $1.5 billion in federal tax grants under the new “Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery” program. “TIGER discretionary funding will open up the door to many new innovative and cutting-edge transportation projects,” Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said in a statement.


The rule published in the Federal Register gave as examples of “innovative” projects those that use “dynamic pricing” and “radio frequency identification (RFID)” tracking devices on vehicles. The notice goes on to explain that grant applicants must have “legislative authority to charge user fees or set toll rate” if the project involves tolling.

LaHood also announced last Thursday that the department would bankroll a number of toll road feasibility studies using $6 million in federal gas tax dollars under the department’s Value Pricing Program.

In the San Francisco, California Bay Area, $3.2 million would be spent to encourage tolls on State Route 237. In Washington state, $1.3 million would be spent on a study of tolling in the Puget Sound region. In Minnesota, federal taxpayers would pay $400,000 to create a study showing the benefits of imposing tolls on Interstate 94. Finally, $717,000 in federal tax dollars would be spent on a study of GPS-based per-mile tolling for trucks in New York.

The latter grant is unusual because the White House explicitly backed away from the concept of nationwide per-mile taxes when LaHood first floated the idea in February.

“I can weigh in on it and say that it is not and will not be the policy of the Obama administration,” Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said on February 20.

Prior to the White House policy statement, LaHood had been quite explicit in his support for a policy of imposing tolls on drivers with rhetoric indistinguishable from that of his predecessor, former Transportation Secretary Mary Peters. Now LaHood is once again providing vocal support for tolls. Last week he sent a signal to the New York state legislature and New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg to revive the failed effort to impose a tax of up to $22 for cars and trucks entering downtown Manhattan. In an interview with NY1 News, LaHood promised that the $350 million in federal tax money would be available as a financial reward if the city imposes the toll.

“The money that was going to be provided for that particular project is still at the Department of Transportation,” LaHood told NY1. “If New York got its act together around that kind of opportunity, I think we would look at it.”

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 28 comments
  • Jkross22 Jkross22 on May 20, 2009
    the point is that taxes pay for all sorts of services. Well, my question still stands - any idea of that $258B that was the Highway bill a few years ago, how much actually was spent on highway repair, retrofit or new roads? I don't know either. For some reason, that info sure is hard to come by. I wonder why. Yet here comes another gov't representative selling smoke and mirrors about how this time the money really will be spent on the roads. Sure.
  • Anonymous Anonymous on May 20, 2009

    Toll Roads are the worst thing this government can encourage. I would rather have marijuana legalized than have toll roads. Higher cafe and toll roads... I can't believe those conspiracy theorists about the left wing are coming true through incremental socialism. Essentially take people out of their cars and group them into large cities where they can be controlled. Welcome to the future, the ghetto with big brother.

  • 1995 SC Wife has a new Ridgeline and it came with 2 years so I don't have to think about it for a while.My FIAT needed a battery (the 12V...not the drive battery), a replacement steering column cover and I had to buy a Tesla Charging adapter to use the destination charger at one of the places I frequent. Also had to replace the charge cable because I am an idiot and ran the stock one over and destroyed the connector. Around 600 bucks all in there but 250 is because of the cable.The Thunderbird has needed much the past year. ABS Pump - 300. Master Cylinder 100. Tool to bleed ABS 350 (Welcome to pre OBD2 electronics), Amp for Stereo -250, Motor mounts 150, Injectors 300, Airbag Module - 15 at the u pull it, Belts and hoses, 100 - Plugs and wires 100, Trans fluid, filter and replacement pan, 150, ignition lock cylinder and rekey - 125, Cassette Player mechanism - 15 bucks at the U Pull it, and a ton of time to do things like replace the grease in the power seat motots (it was hard and the seats wouldn't move when cold), Rear pinion seal - 15 buckjs, Fix a million broken tabs in the dash surround, recap the ride control module and all. My wife would say more, but my Math has me around 2 grand. Still needs an exhaust manifold gasket and the drivers side window acts up from time to time. I do it all but if I were paying someone that would be rough. It's 30 this year though so I roll with it. You'll have times like these running old junk.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Besides for the sake of emissions I don’t understand why the OEM’s went with small displacement twin turbo engines in heavy trucks. Like you guys stated above there really isn’t a MPG advantage. Plus that engine is under stress pulling that truck around then you hit it with turbos, more rpm’s , air, fuel, heat. My F-150 Ecoboost 3.5 went through one turbo replacement and the other was leaking. l’ll stick with my 2021 V8 Tundra.
  • Syke What I'll never understand about economics reporting: $1.1 billion net income is a mark of failure? Anyone with half a brain recognizes that Tesla is slowly settling in to becoming just another EV manufacturer, now that the legacy manufacturers have gained a sense of reality and quit tripping over their own feet in converting their product lines. Who is stupid enough to believe that Tesla is going to remain 90% of the EV market for the next ten years?Or is it just cheap headlines to highlight another Tesla "problem"?
  • Rna65689660 I had an AMG G-Wagon roar past me at night doing 90 - 100. What a glorious sound. This won’t get the same vibe.
  • Marc Muskrat only said what he needed to say to make the stock pop. These aren't the droids you're looking for. Move along.
Next