By on May 6, 2009

Let’s face it? I’ve been covering GM’s slide into bankruptcy for well over four years now, and it never ceases to amaze me how the people inside the company persist in trying to paper over cracks in the company’s operations that make the Grand Canyon look like a paper cut. In this case, a personage no less than Vice Chairman Tom Stevens gets in the Fastlane to tell the world that GM doesn’t have a fucking clue what it’s doing with its products or brands. “Although Saturn’s future is likely not to be within GM now, I can assure you our commitment to hybrid, plug-in hybrid and advanced battery technology is a key element of GM’s reinvention. I’m pleased to let you know the plug-in hybrid technology will be applied to one of GM’s four core brands. Stay tuned for which one, and in the meantime, I’ll enjoy reading the speculation.”

Stevens’ blog entry might not be the most cavalier statement I’ve ever heard, but the remark certainly rivals General Westmoreland’s infamous utterances. Nor is Stevens’ “hide and seek” statement the height of arrogance. But I did get a nosebleed reading it. And here’s the cake icing:

The Volt and plug-in hybrid vehicle are two of 14 hybrid and electric vehicles GM plans to offer by 2012. So while it may seem at times we’re taking a step back, we’re really taking two steps forward.

And there I was thinking GM was stuck in reverse. Silly me.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

16 Comments on ““Let’s face it. We’re making a lot of difficult yet necessary decisions these days to ensure GM’s long-term future”...”

  • avatar

    So GM is supposed to stand for Green Motors?
    And how about dealer market adjustments on the Volt? Might they be outlawed or discouraged?

  • avatar

    “Although Saturn’s future is likely not to be within GM now…”{589C0639-9C78-4084-AAA8-AE6D21484633}&siteid=yhoof2

    Now Renault wants Saturn…

  • avatar

    Our tax dollars hard at work keeping fools like this with cushy jobs.

  • avatar

    What an ignorant location for a power connection. I’d just LOVE to see someone open the door and destroy both the male and female connector.

    GM at its finest.

  • avatar


    As long as the power connector does not protrude past the panel gap and the door does not open more than 90 degrees, I don’t see the problem.

  • avatar

    “What an ignorant location for a power connection. I’d just LOVE to see someone open the door and destroy both the male and female connector.”

    They could use some pretty cute design cues to design around the problem. Like using the G3:s A-post portholes…

  • avatar

    Just giving it some eye-ball engineering I think Rastus has a point. Unless that door has a clever linkage (4-bar or such) I think it would work out just as he surmises.

    Probably positioned by someone in the styling group (Ya! That looks good.)

    Just a thought.


  • avatar

    They aren’t thinking user-friendliness either. That connection is on the “wrong” side of the door, seen from the drivers position.

  • avatar

    I love literary slight of hands such as “Let’s face it…”

    At the time of giving I’d hear narration saying “Little did we know…”

  • avatar

    It’s Stephens, not Stevens.
    I my experience with Tom he is a tall guy but his ego definitely dwarfs his height.

  • avatar

    What an ignorant location for a power connection. I’d just LOVE to see someone open the door and destroy both the male and female connector.

    I would think in that position you’d see it before opening the door to leave your home, making it a rather smart location. Putting it somewhere out of sight could lead to some half-asleep dude on the way to work in the morning forgetting to unplug it and either causing the damage that you had mentioned, or at least dragging his (probably expensive) cord to work with him.

  • avatar

    Leaving the humor of a GM exec “facing it” aside, there could be an excellent design reason for that plug location: a driver’s door interlock. If the plug is where it’s easy for the driver to see/access, and you make it impossible to open the door with the plug engaged, you’ve created a design immune to many potential operator errors, IMO.

    Then again, maybe it has none of that going for it and it’s just another muffed product that’ll never make it to market.

  • avatar

    What superbadd said. I think that is exactly why it is there.

    I have dropped my motorcycle twice because I forgot to remove the lock affixed to my disk brake. The location of the plug is clearly designed to make a comparable error more difficult with a plug-in vehicle.

  • avatar

    Believe it or not, I think GM had it right some 20+ years ago with the EV1. The connector was inductive (ie, there were no electrical prongs involved which can break)…and the slot was mounted right on the front of the vehicle.

    If you are concerned w/ driving off with the connector plugged in, it would be best to mount on the front of the vehicle…as you will not torque the thing as you back out. I’ve never seen a car “back out” at a 90-degree angle (except for those weird test vehicles you see once every so often which never makes it to production).

    Re. interlocks…they can be placed anywhere…even in the hocky-puc style Magne Charge. If the connector is engaged, no backie-outie.

    See where GM could be if they actually stuck to their research…and worked on perfecting it? Imagine what 20+ years of development would have yielded. Instead, we got the fuel-efficient Escalade.

  • avatar

    “fuel-efficient Escalade” – At least this thread gave us a fine oxymoron.

    I know an interlock system could be included with any plug location, but having the plug placed where a driver will likely see it before entering the car adds redundancy and convenience.

  • avatar

    It never ends with GM and Chrysler. I can’t wait to buy my next car from either of them

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: 2016 Acura ILX Review: Big Changes Make The ILX Competitive, Not A Segment Leader

    spreadsheet monkey - Out of interest, what do you drive, DW? And what else besides the S2000 would make it into your list...
  • Re: Review: 2015 BMW M235xi

    hgrunt - 1998, when the e46 came out, it was called fat and soft vs the e36…in a recent review of the E46 M3, the reviewer called it “analog” but when it came...
  • Re: 2015 BMW X4 xDrive28i Review (With Video)

    VenomV12 - My friend’s dad had a Buick Park Avenue Ultra when we were in high school and goddamnit if that was not one of the best riding and most...
  • Re: Review: 2015 BMW M235xi

    hgrunt - I recently test drove a nearly no-option 2015 Ecoboost mustang and nearly fully loaded GT back to back. They felt remarkably similar to my E46 330i ZHP, which had Bilstein...
  • Re: 2015 BMW X4 xDrive28i Review (With Video)

    VenomV12 - BMW is a goddamn mess. To me the brand becomes less and less prestigious and appealing everyday and most of their models just seem like desperate,...
  • Re: Thank You And Goodbye

    DeadWeight - I’m not a troll. I’m a relentless critic, cynic & skeptic of things automotive; the world needs far more people like myself, and if there were more,...
  • Re: Yahoo Autos, Autoblog Gain New Editors

    VenomV12 - I didn’t know there was a Yahoo Autos and Autoblog has been a giant mess for some time now.
  • Re: Thank You And Goodbye

    VenomV12 - As I said before, I would actually like to see this happen.
  • Re: Thank You And Goodbye

    VenomV12 - I like DW, I second that nomination. BTSR would also be good, that would make this one hell of a crazy and interesting site too. Ha Ha.
  • Re: Thank You And Goodbye

    VenomV12 - Agreed, I haven’t been coming to this site for very long, but the turnover is astounding.

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote


  • Contributing Writers

  • Jack Baruth, United States
  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Vojta Dobes, Czech Republic
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Cameron Aubernon, United States
  • J Emerson, United States