Chrysler Reaches Some Sort of Tentative Agreement With UAW

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

“The UAW said it reached a deal with Fiat and the U.S. government.” Oops! I forgot the word “also”. I wonder how that happened. Because everyone knows Chrysler’s management is large and in charge, despite the fact that its existence depends entirely on the largesse of the American taxpayer and the success of a cockamamie scheme hatched by a struggling Italian automaker and an unelected quango known as The Presidential Task Force on Automobiles. The Detroit News provides the details of the agreement, which show that the UAW—wait . . . No they don’t. Motown’s hometown paper doesn’t provide any details of the union – Chrysler – Fiat – PTFOA agreement. All we get is this: “The settlement agreement, subject to ratification by UAW members at Chrysler, includes a revision of the 2007 health care deal, and members must approve the deal by Wednesday.” At best, we can assume some sort of health care obligation for equity swap involved. At worst, Uncle Sam will guarantee the union’s health care provisions, regardless of Chrysler’s ultimate fate (i.e., liquidation.) As the DetN recognizes, whatever the fine print, the union deal paves the way for American Leyland.

One big issue for Chrysler is that it won’t produce any vehicles with Fiat technology until 2011. With the automaker burning through as much as $1billion a month after losing $8 billion in 2008, it’s unclear how it can survive on just $6 billion more in taxpayer loans . . .

Chrysler would need debtor in possession financing—funds to operate while it’s in bankruptcy—from the government or get government backing for such financing. It has pegged the figure at $24 billion over two years.

And the rest.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 5 comments
  • Anonymous Anonymous on Apr 27, 2009

    And so the UAW achieves their payoff. I am sure several million will be flowing back to Obama.

  • Rod Panhard Rod Panhard on Apr 27, 2009

    And the Game of Chicken continues. This time, the UAW makes a "deal" and Fiat says, "Yes, it looks good to us because we don't pay any money." So the UAW fakes a flinch, and they end up looking like "The Good Guys." Yet, we don't know what they did. Brilliant play. If it goes to UAW vote, then the secret will get out and we'll know what the "concessions" are. I seriously doubt they're much, but I'm certain that Fiat's pockets aren't any emptier, either now or in the future. Same with Cerberus. I hate to say this, but this is way more entertaining than anything on TV, pay-per-view, etc.

  • Master Baiter Mass adoption of EVs will require:[list=1][*]400 miles of legitimate range at 80 MPH at 100°F with the AC on, or at -10°F with the cabin heated to 72°F. [/*][*]Wide availability of 500+ kW fast chargers that are working and available even on busy holidays, along interstates where people drive on road trips. [/*][*]Wide availability of level 2 chargers at apartments and on-street in urban settings where people park on the street. [/*][*]Comparable purchase price to ICE vehicle. [/*][/list=1]
  • Master Baiter Another bro-dozer soon to be terrorizing suburban streets near you...
  • Wolfwagen NO. Im not looking to own an EV until:1. Charge times from 25% - 100% are equal to what it takes to fill up an ICE vehicle and 2. until the USA proves we have enough power supply so as not to risk the entire grid going down when millions of people come home from work and plug their vehicles in the middle of a heat wave with feel-like temps over 100.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Where's the mpg?
  • Grg These days, it is not only EVs that could be more affordable. All cars are becoming less affordable.When you look at the complexity of ICE cars vs EVs, you cannot help. but wonder if affordability will flip to EVs?
Next