By on April 16, 2009

BMW has begun the business of selling its X5 M (not MX5) and X6 M (not MX6) to paying customers. Here’s the heritage-scented pitch:

The modern, sustainable legacy of BMW M GmbH began in 1985 when engineers placed the snarling, race-bred inline-6 engine from the M1 supercar into the production BMW 5 Series sedan, reworked the suspension and brakes, and created the first M5. Through this industry-first combination of attributes, the M5 redefined the capabilities of a sedan with levels of power, precision, balance, and linear control never before imaginable. Since then, finding new ways to expand the boundaries of what is possible with existing BMW models has been the singular purpose of the craftsmen at BMW M. Now the BMW X5 M and the BMW X6 M are the first all-wheel-drive models to offer the remarkable performance, dynamic driving experience, athletic design, and premium quality of a BMW M product.

Both models are powered by a newly-developed 4.4-liter V8 M engine delivering 555 hp at 6,000 rpm and 500 lb-ft of torque from 1500 to 5,650 rpm. This new M engine is the world’s first with a pulse-tuned exhaust manifold encompassing both rows of cylinders combined with high-performance twin-scroll twin turbo technology.

For the X5 M and X6 M, engineers at BMW M pushed the capabilities of BMW’s intelligent xDrive all-wheel-drive system and the Dynamic Performance Control system to manage the power and performance potential of these two new vehicles. The special M suspension includes Adaptive Drive and newly-developed Servotronic power steering. These features combine to push the limits of what was previously possible with a sports-oriented vehicle, and guarantee driving behavior characteristic of a BMW M product: incredible stability and precisely controlled steering qualities abound throughout the performance envelope.

Convinced?

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

22 Comments on “BMW’s XM Radio. X-Files? X-cess? X-treme? Your Call....”


  • avatar
    doch

    Yes.

  • avatar
    Jeff Puthuff

    It’s the BMW Venza.

  • avatar
    Ronman

    No, unless it’s delivered to my door free of charge with a lifetime supply of fuel and maintenance. and dare i say Tires….

  • avatar
    Brian E

    An AWD M? Sure, no problem. X5 and X6 M? Nope, not convinced.

    I honestly think there’s a case for an X3 M with a tuned version of the twin-turbo six, but that’s because the X3 is basically a 3-series sport wagon with cladding.

  • avatar
    superbadd75

    What’s a “pulse-tuned” exhaust? These things will likely be impressive on the road, but one can only imagine what they’ll cost. I wouldn’t think that right now would be the best time to debut vehicles like these.

  • avatar
    pista

    Brian E +1

    Race-bred engines in trucks is a rollover recipe. There must be a less dramatic way to keep these things off the road, though.

  • avatar
    B.C.

    Nope. Although there IS a way to convince me: have a SUV-class race series with only fat oinkers allowed. X5/X6-M vs ML63 AMG? Then we’ll get to see these things driven the way the marketdroids say they can be driven, or see them destroyed trying.

  • avatar
    thetopdog

    Isn’t BMW complaining about CAFE?

  • avatar
    luke740

    I don’t understand why they’re M’ing the X5 and the X6. Doesn’t it go against their principles? If not, why not finally make an M7, also? THAT I can get really excited about… I can’t imagine anything better than my 01 740i Sport with about 250 more horsepower!

  • avatar
    like.a.kite

    I really can’t understand all the bitching about this. They’re still exceedingly nice vehicles. If you don’t like them, then they were not designed for you. So don’t buy one. Christ.

    Doesn’t it go against their principles?

    Remember all the Porsche hate when the 996 ditched air-cooling?

  • avatar
    psarhjinian

    Dropped about three inches, the X6 wouldn’t be a bad looking car.

    That said, neither would an M5 Touring.

  • avatar
    carguy

    Who would have thought even 10 years ago that BMW would be in the business of making obese sports cars? And wearing an M badge no less. The V8 X6 weights in at a super sized 5,300 pounds and that, in my book, is pushing the M brand where it ought not go. Whatever happened to the ethos of agility and athleticism?
    An over powered German SUV is the sort of thing I would have expected from AMG but not BMW.

    Whats next, the RSQ7 from Audi?

  • avatar

    What the hell is a pulse-tuned exhaust manifold encompassing both rows of cylinders combined with high-performance twin-scroll twin turbo technology? Is that a manifold mounted in the valley?

    I’ll resist complaining about the absurdity of this, as its all been said before.

  • avatar

    brand suicide.

  • avatar
    cRacK hEaD aLLeY

    I live in a small suburb South of Vancouver, BC with perhaps 500-600 or so homes bordering the USA. Yesterday on my nightly walk with my son I counted SIX of these new things parked on different driveways. hard to explain.

  • avatar
    TireGuy

    I do not like the look of the X6 – but that is a private decision. The X5 looks great. And in an M – version? Exceptional vehicle, with superb performance certainly.

  • avatar
    meefer

    BMW needed something to keep up with the Cayenne Turbo, this is it. I don’t see how any enthusiast of the brand will buy it, but as a “hey look at me, I’m new money” tool, it fits the bill.

  • avatar
    like.a.kite

    I can’t stand all the X6 hate. I’m past due to have done something about it. I can’t wait.

  • avatar
    Tosh

    Why wouldn’t ANY brand with ANY sporting pretenses NOT make a hopped-up version of EVERY model they make? Seems like easy money to me?

  • avatar
    niky

    pista :
    April 16th, 2009 at 7:49 am

    Brian E +1

    Race-bred engines in trucks is a rollover recipe. There must be a less dramatic way to keep these things off the road, though.

    You’ve apparently never driven an X5. You could sooner roll a low-riding Lincoln Continental… say… a dozen times… before you could even lift a wheel on an X5.

    -

    Of course, the Continental rides softer.

    -

    Having had seat time in the X6, I’d say this is one of the few SUVs that could probably handle all that power and be safe to use. Of course, I wish it were lighter… lower… oh hell… I wish they’d dump the stupid headlights and tail-lights on the M6 and stick the X6 units on it.

    -

    A 1.8 ton SUV is no more of a “sell-out” for BMW’s M-badge than a 1.7 ton sedan is… (cough M5… cough…) or shall we ask Porsche about the Cayenne? Or the Panamerica?

  • avatar
    dgduris

    Call me old fashioned.

    I like the Colin Chapman approach to driving machines:

    “Simplicate, then add in lightness.”

    These things are beasts: unattractive to my eye and sense of motoring decorum.

  • avatar

    It’s not about performance of the Automotive sort.

    It’s about parking lot parity. The ///M at the Golf Club, or in the executive parking lot. That’ll show Cayenne Turbo guy ! Take that, G Wagon-man. I out snob you, Range Rover gal !

    $2500 in each car for $25,000 in return is good money.

    You sports car guys don’t really matter for this one. You are not the market.

    That ///M is justifiably worth money attached to most of the cars that get it. That some idiot wants an “m class” X6 in no way diminishes your M5. BMW gets his 25k, most of which is pure profit. Why should they leave money on the table (lots of it) because some sportcar guys whine ?

    I’d not buy one, but…..


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: GM Builds Their Last 1500 Series Van

    Signal11 - I wonder what the breakdown is on the E-series and GMC/Chevy twins is for half tons versus heavy duty versions. From what we’ve heard from folks...
  • Re: GM Builds Their Last 1500 Series Van

    Signal11 - I understand that the Sprinter is not FWD. I guess in that sense, I am referring more to European style vans in general in a certain sense. In Texas, I see...
  • Re: Chart Of The Day: Crossovers Are King

    Signal11 - Well, where do you draw the line between a small minivan and a CUV? Is the Transit Connect a van or CUV? What about the Kia Carens/Rondo? Is the Soul a CUV...
  • Re: Your Chance To Spend The Night With Caroline, Jack And Bark

    April - Too bad there is no moderation here. All the degrading comments/slurs really take away from TTAC being a top tier automotive site. @...
  • Re: Chart Of The Day: Crossovers Are King

    Marcelo de Vasconcellos - Again, I think we are saying the same thing in different words. The rising beltlines of cars add to that safety argument. They rise partly...
  • Re: Chart Of The Day: Crossovers Are King

    Marcelo de Vasconcellos - Agreed, plus the fact they sell for a bit more than their car brethren means makers don’t mind making and pushing them more. I’d...
  • Re: Chart Of The Day: Crossovers Are King

    Signal11 - I disagree that it’s a safety thing. I think it’s more of a visibility and perception of control thing. You see more of your surroundings the...
  • Re: Confession Time: I Want A Smart Forfour

    iganpo - Head-on collision? Actually it is very simple. Gather the following: - mass of car 1 - mass of car 2 - initial velocity of car 1 (25 mph) - initial...
  • Re: Chart Of The Day: Crossovers Are King

    Pch101 - SUVs were enormously popular here until fuel prices became too high to justify them. Many of the factors that supported the SUV market are still in play, but...
  • Re: GM Builds Their Last 1500 Series Van

    Pch101 - Some YTD deliveries figures: Ford E-series: 66,905 Chevy Express + GMC Savana: 55,783 Ford Transit Connect: 19,799 Sprinter: 11,483 Tradition still rules this...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Authors

  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • Tycho de Feyter, China
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Faisal Ali Khan, India