Piston Slap: SUV Edition

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

TTAC reader JG writes:

Sajeev, do I have a question for you! Knowing the roads (and potholes) of Houston (like I know you do) here goes. I own a 2001 Ford Explorer 4-door. My pregnant wife curses the ride every time she’s in the car (whether it’s moving, or not). I have recently replaced the tires, which helped a little and ball joints up front. I’d love to get out of this car into something safer, but it’s not an option for a few more years. Is there anything I can do to improve the ride quality? I know I’m dealing with limited options with the solid rear axle, but there has to be something, right?

Sajeev writes:

I see two quick fixes: put several bags of mulch in the cargo area, or hack the muffler and run a straight pipe. (You can get away with it in Texas.) The mulch takes the bite off the leaf springs, and a large amount of ride quality comes from the rear suspension, fuel economy penalty be damned. But the straight pipe ensures your wife will never complain about the Explorer’s terrible ride. Ever.

But seriously: check/replace your shocks, especially the rears. Explorers with air shocks do ride nicer than the regular model, which shows you can fix this oxcart rear suspension. If they are original, consider replacing them no matter what: the fluid (whatever is left) inside the shocks is more like maple syrup by now

TTAC’s own Stein X Leikanger writes:

I really like the original Jeep Cherokee and am comfortable with the 1993-1996 version, except for the fact that most don’t have an airbag, and if they do, it’s only for the driver. Which is kind of selfish.

The car share I’m using doesn’t like my hunting dog(s), and I’m going to need a Jeep (I say that as if it’s a bad thing.) So here’s my question: apart from the other upgrades I’ll do to the car (suspension, engine tweaks, up country reinforcement and raising, etc) – can I retrofit the 1997 passenger airbag into a 1996 model year Cherokee Limited, 4.0L HO? It will already have the driver airbag installed.

And would that be legal? Will it be approved?

Sajeev writes:

Now that you mention it, the amendment to the “Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 208” in the 1980s is quite self-centered. Or aimed at the perpetually lonely.

Back to your question: the 1997-newer models had a redesigned dashboard and steering wheel. That is, the driver’s side airbag might have changed too, in accordance to the “de-powered” regulations that brought USA systems more in-line with Euro regulations. So you’d need another wheel, dash, and probably a new dashboard wiring harness. And who knows: maybe a rewiring of the dash-to-chassis wiring harness too. Which may cause brightly colored warning lights a plenty. Ouch.

I’d recommend you get a stateside 1997 Cherokee and have the seller put an older front fascia in the cargo hole before it enters the shipping container. Or forget about your personal feelings for your passengers.

But I have a line on a 2001 Ford Explorer with dual airbags and a wikkid straight pipe exhaust in my hometown. For cheap: just wait about two months for the seller’s wife to contact me. I’ll even drive it to the Port of Houston for immediate shipping to Europe.

[Email your automotive queries to sajeev.mehta@thetruthaboutcars.com]

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 32 comments
  • Sajeev Mehta Sajeev Mehta on Mar 07, 2009
    Ferrygeist : Yikes…physics. Okay, I’m way in the deep end here, but assuming the ballast is secured to the chassis, then the accelerated mass of that ballast would be diffused (is there a better physics term for this?) through the entire multi-thousand pound structure…wouldn’t it? And also in that case, wouldn't a loaded vehicle fare better in a collision with another vehicle...because more inertia is transferred to the other vehicle and now (with the ballast) there is more of it?
  • Rpn453 Rpn453 on Mar 09, 2009
    Mehta: And also in that case, wouldn’t a loaded vehicle fare better in a collision with another vehicle…because more inertia is transferred to the other vehicle and now (with the ballast) there is more of it? The more heavily loaded vehicle would slow less and impart more energy on the other vehicle, so the reduced deceleration may be helpful to the loaded vehicles occupants. But the loaded vehicle will also have to absorb more energy in the impact, which could result in more structural deformation. If the deformation is low enough that it does not contribute to injury by causing passenger compartment intrusion, then more weight will help the passengers of the loaded vehicle while causing more harm to the other vehicle. If the collision is severe enough that the passenger compartment deforms, then the weight will increase the degree of deformation. In my collision, an extra few hundred pounds in the trunk or back seat may have been enough to finish me off.
  • Haze3 EV median weight is in the range of 4500-5500lbs, similar to the low end of full size pickup trucks and SUV's or typical mid-size PU's and SUV's. Obviously, EV Hummers and PU's are heavier but, on average, EV=PU or mid/full SUV is about right. EV's currently account for ~1% of the cars on the road. PU's account for 17% and SUV's count for over 40%. If we take out light SUV's, then call it 30% SUV or so. So, large-ish PU's and SUV's, together, account for ~50% of the US fleet vs 1% for EV's. As such, the fleet is ALREADY heavy. The problem is that EV's will be making the currently lighter 50% heavier, not that PU/SUV haven't already done most of the damage on avg mass.Sure, the issue is real but EV responsibility is not. If you want to get after heavies, that means getting after PU/SUV's (the current problem by 40-50x) first and foremost.
  • Redapple2 Telluride over Acadian (sic-tip cap-canada). 1 better car. 2 60 % us/can content vs 39 THIRTY NINE for an "American" car. 3 no UAW labor. Smart people drive Tellurides. Not so smart for the GMC. Dont support the Evil GM Vampire.!
  • Theflyersfan My dad had a 1998 C280 that was rock solid reliable until around 80,000 miles and then it wasn't. Corey might develop a slight right eyelid twitch right about now, but it started with a sunroof that leaked. And the water likely damaged some electric components because soon after the leaks developed, the sunroof stopped working. And then the electrical gremlins took hold. Displays that flickered at times, lights that sometimes decided illumination was for wimps so stayed home, and then the single wiper issue. That thing decided to eat motors. He loved that car but knew when to fold the hand. So he bought a lightly used, off lease E-class. Had that for less than two years before he was ready to leave it in South Philly, keys in the ignition, doors unlocked, and a "Take it please" sign on the windshield. He won't touch another Benz now.
  • Detlump A lot of people buy SUVs because they're easier to get in and out of. After decades of longer, lower, wider it was refreshing to have easier ingress/egress offered by an SUV.Ironically, the ease of getting in and out of my Highlander is very similar to my 56 Cadillac.
  • Redapple2 LP Michigan. Long straights. A long sweeper. 2 chicanes. 4 hard turns. Lenghts of each element are different but similar to LeMans.
Next