Nissan Bids For Worst Hybrid Strategy

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

You know that advertisement for the Cadillac Escalade Hybrid where a douchey fellow suggests that “they should hybrid (sic) this thing”? I would post the video, but it seems that Cadillac has pulled all trace of the spot from the interwebs leaving only the marginally less insipid “cupholders” and “checkmate” ads on its website. And though it’s strange to plumb the Tubes of You for hours and not find this mythically inane third ad, it’s disappearance down the memory hole isn’t surprising at all. The spot suggested a troglodyte’s approach to hybrid technology that is only underscored by the reality of GM’s hybrid strategy: quick-n-dirty BAS, expensive and complex two-mode system, and moon-shot EREV. Hybrid this. Okay, now hybrid that. [ED: Zammy found it!] But Nissan’s announcement today that it will be bringing a hybrid version of its Infiniti M to the US market in 2010 has to put the Japanese firm in contention for worst hybrid strategy around.

Or, perhaps not. It’s distinctly possible that calling this decision a “strategy” at all is to praise with faint damnation (so to speak). Nissan’s only other hybrid offering is the plaintively me-too Altima Hybrid, complete with a licensed version of Toyota’s Synergy Drive. And now this? A hybrid RWD luxury sedan? Toyota ‘s Lexus division may have sold 16,858 hybrid hoopties last year, but no fewer than 15,200 of them were of the RX400h persuasion. And from anecdotal evidence, most of the remaining 1,658 hybrid sedans must have been LS600hs. Like GM, Nissan is trying to keep a half-hearted toe in the hybrid pool while nerving itself to leap into the great (ER)EV unknown. And like GM, its unfocused hybrid efforts are consistently coming across as wastes of time and money.

And for what? Does Nissan think putting a single hybrid in each of its US brands makes any kind of impact on the consumer? More troublingly, does Nissan think it can compete with Lexus’s GS for its niche within a niche? GM’s Escalade Hybrid (and pulled ad) prove that hybrid filler products can do as much harm as good, slapping an ugly, cynical face on your ostensibly feel-good, eco-halo product.


Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • Dwford Dwford on Mar 23, 2009

    Listen, there's at least 200 people out there screaming for an Infiniti M hybrid.

  • Don1967 Don1967 on Mar 23, 2009

    The worst hybrid strategy would be to have a "hybrid strategy". Nissan deserves credit for paying only lip service to this silly fad.

  • 3-On-The-Tree I had a 69 Thunderbird with a 429 and it did the same thing.
  • Lou_BC No. An EV would have to replace my primary vehicle. That means it has to be able to do everything my current vehicle does.
  • Bkojote @Lou_BC I don't know how broad of a difference in capability there is between 2 door and 4 door broncos or even Wranglers as I can't speak to that from experience. Generally the consensus is while a Tacoma/4Runner is ~10% less capable on 'difficult' trails they're significantly more pleasant to drive on the way to the trails and actually pleasant the other 90% of the time. I'm guessing the Trailhunter narrows that gap even more and is probably almost as capable as a 4 Door Bronco Sasquatch but significantly more pleasant/fuel efficient on the road. To wit, just about everyone in our group with a 4Runner bought a second set of wheels/tires for when it sees road duty. Everyone in our group with a Bronco bought a second vehicle...
  • Aja8888 No.
  • 2manyvettes Since all of my cars have V8 gas engines (with one exception, a V6) guess what my opinion is about a cheap EV. And there is even a Tesla supercharger all of a mile from my house.
Next