GM "More Open" To Bankruptcy

John Horner
by John Horner

The Wall Street Journal reports that the usual unnamed “top executives” are saying GM is warming to the idea of bankruptcy after all. “The change in thinking, combined with the disclosure Thursday that GM’s auditor has raised ‘substantial doubt’ about the car maker’s ability to keep going, appears to move GM closer to the possibility it will file for reorganization.” Something about staring at the hangman’s noose brings a new clarity of thought to the fore. The journal’s new owner seems to have brought a bit of dry British humor to the biz: “The increased threat of bankruptcy could prod bondholders into making concessions, since these investors are said to believe a bankruptcy reorganization could harm their holdings, according to a person familiar with their thinking.” Wow, those bond manipulating masters of the universe sure are smart!

GM’s new fantasy is that a relatively low-pain, pre-packaged bankruptcy could be done inside a 90 day window without hurting sales, or losing the top dogs their food bowls. What about all those times the company has declared bankruptcy off-the-table because it would send customers packing? No worries—expensive consultants are on the job: “GM’s bankruptcy advisers, meanwhile, have been working on a plan to mitigate the impact a bankruptcy filing would have on GM’s public image.” Meanwhile GM spokesflak, Julie Gibson, spins at tornado velocities when saying the auditors’ going-concern warning “is not fundamentally a big deal.” Apparently not everyone has gotten to the acceptance phase yet.

Meanwhile, politicians and bureaucrats in Washington continue to ponder, pontificate and punt. “Administration officials are still weeks away from making a decision on how to assist the struggling auto makers. The negotiations with GM and Chrysler LLC are supposed to conclude by March 31, but with so many issues unresolved, people involved with the talks say the effort could slip into April. Administration officials who are dissecting GM’s 117-page viability plan said they weren’t surprised by the starkness of the auditors’ assessment.” But tell me this, why is it a negotiation? Beggars don’t negotiate, they beg.

John Horner
John Horner

More by John Horner

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 23 comments
  • Mtypex Mtypex on Mar 06, 2009

    You see, that's the problem. If only the Titanic had OnStar, it would be have been "backed by GM."

  • Craiggbear Craiggbear on Mar 06, 2009

    SecCpotatoes and Arminius are correct - I didn't mean the companies folded up their tents, they just left the (stock) markets - by going private. How else can you leave the market? Ch. 11 or 7, I guess, Nice effect,though, don't you think?

  • Varezhka Maybe the volume was not big enough to really matter anyways, but losing a “passenger car” for a mostly “light truck” line-up should help Subaru with their CAFE numbers too.
  • Varezhka For this category my car of choice would be the CX-50. But between the two cars listed I’d select the RAV4 over CR-V. I’ve always preferred NA over small turbos and for hybrids THS’ longer history shows in its refinement.
  • AZFelix I would suggest a variation on the 'fcuk, marry, kill' game using 'track, buy, lease' with three similar automotive selections.
  • Formula m For the gas versions I like the Honda CRV. Haven’t driven the hybrids yet.
  • SCE to AUX All that lift makes for an easy rollover of your $70k truck.
Next