Disney World – GM "Test Track" Ride RIP?

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

Last Thanksgiving, I took my step-daughter to the GM “Test Track” at Disney World. When we walked up to the heavy steel door, the ride was “temporarily closed” for “technical reasons.” We waited. The ride reopened twenty minutes later. We were cattle herded through a chain link channel, passing various displays designed to educate guests about automotive development: air bags, door longevity, etc. The ten-year-old displays were worn, dated and dusty. There was no branding anywhere; no mention of Buick, Chevrolet, Pontiac, GMC, Saturn, Saab, Cadillac or HUMMER. When we got to the acoustic chamber, the ride broke. Not good: the chamber lacked ventilation. People started leaving the line after 20 minutes. Just before the ride, a short video (on a small TV) extolled the joys of ABS—for a Chevy Trailblazer.

The cars themselves were generic in a nostalgic sort of way (when was the last time you rode three across in the front of a vehicle?). The best part of the ride: the high speed outdoor run. The cars pulled some serious G’s. At the end of the ride, participants blew through the new car showroom as if it didn’t exist. The new plug-in electric gas hybrid Chevy Volt, which doesn’t yet exist, didn’t exist there. As a ride, my 11-year-old Rock and Roller Coaster-loving stepdaughter gave GM Test Track a 4. During the post ride comprehension test, she scored an F.

Automotive News [sub] reports that GM and Disney might close the ride. It’s certainly not the first time GM has had trouble with Test Track. The original opening was rescheduled twice, delayed by a total of 22 months. For its part, Disney now has the Cars movie franchise upon which to build auto-related entertainment. And GM has something of a cash flow/political problem . . .

Can GM walk away from Test Track, which attracts more than 7 million people a year? GM is damned if it renews its sponsorship and damned it if doesn’t. If GM renews, critics may call it a waste of taxpayer money. After all, the automaker is borrowing billions of dollars from the federal government to stay afloat.

Should GM walk away from Test Track, another automaker, possibly an import, may snatch the opportunity and sign with Disney for years, maybe decades.

For an automaker, Test Track is the perfect venue to build a positive image and woo car buyers. But for GM, those days may be over.

As one of GM’s newest investors, I’ve got nothing against GM offering a kick-ass corporate PR ride that educates consumers as to the value of the engineering underlying its products. Test Track, however, needs to be hauled over a berm and shot.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • HEATHROI HEATHROI on Feb 09, 2009

    If your name is on the outside of the Building then then you 'own' it. It doesn't matter if Mickey does the dusting. I thought it was just wasted space for GM. The test track was ok but after you had been on Disney's roller coasters it was a triumph of the blah. On the way out the only cars on view were a Lucerne and a G6... and nothing else. Nothing about where you could contact anybody to drive one or anything details about them. They could have been in storage. This was the place to put the Volt or the Z01 or the Concept Cars in front of the US public, the latest and the greatest (such as it is) but again this is GM we are talking. (Motto; hey where did all the money go?)

  • Jack Baruth Jack Baruth on Feb 09, 2009

    Test Track has been a nightmare for Disney since the day it opened. To begin with, for purposes of "realism" each individual car has its own: * Motor (electric, of course) * Real disc brakes * Real tires * Suspension Note that three of those four are SERIOUS wear items. Imagine that you autocrossed your car fourteen hours a day; now you can understand what those cars go through. Tires are reportedly replaced MORE THAN ONCE A DAY. Brakes are serviced on a regular basis. The cars are now more than ten years old so they experience mechanical failures. The Imagineers aimed a little high on this one. Incidentally, this is the only Disney ride that has the capacity to scare me. If I get in the car on the right side, my "HPDE instructor" mindset clicks on and I spend the next two minutes expecting the "student" to hit something :)

  • SCE to AUX Range only matters if you need more of it - just like towing capacity in trucks.I have a short-range EV and still manage to put 1000 miles/month on it, because the car is perfectly suited to my use case.There is no such thing as one-size-fits all with vehicles.
  • Doug brockman There will be many many people living in apartments without dedicated charging facilities in future who will need personal vehicles to get to work and school and for whom mass transit will be an annoying inconvenience
  • Jeff Self driving cars are not ready for prime time.
  • Lichtronamo Watch as the non-us based automakers shift more production to Mexico in the future.
  • 28-Cars-Later " Electrek recently dug around in Tesla’s online parts catalog and found that the windshield costs a whopping $1,900 to replace.To be fair, that’s around what a Mercedes S-Class or Rivian windshield costs, but the Tesla’s glass is unique because of its shape. It’s also worth noting that most insurance plans have glass replacement options that can make the repair a low- or zero-cost issue. "Now I understand why my insurance is so high despite no claims for years and about 7,500 annual miles between three cars.
Next