Capsule Review: 2009 Acura RL

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

When a car salesman tells you an expensive model’s pointless, nine times out of ten, it’s pointless. If he proffers this opinion in the depths of a recession, with new car sales lower than Bernie Madoff’s morals, it’s a dead cert. I’ve experienced this vehicular vertigo twice in the last week. First, when contemplating a zero-mile Honda Civic Mugen Si gathering dust in an otherwise empty former Saturn showroom. Second, whilst sitting in an Acura RL, moments away from an extended test drive. The salesman told me flat out that the Acura TL is a better car than the RL, hinting that anyone who buys an RL is a sap. As I’ve rated the TL as a one-star car, where do you go from there?

Nowhere. And not very fast, either. The main difference between the new top-spec TL and the five-year-old face lifted RL: the über-Acura’s less powerful, even less torquey engine. OK, it’s only a five horsepower deficit (300 HP @ 6300 rpm vs. 305 HP @ 6200 rpm). But luxury brands like Porsche didn’t bank the big bucks by dismissing the importance of insignificant differences in engine power. Other than that, you could be looking at, sitting in and driving the exact same car, crashing over broken pavement, safe in the knowledge that you paid $8k for the privilege of . . . a solid piece of wood embedded in the instrument panel.

Strange to say, this indistinguishableousity is something of a triumph. The RL is made in Saitama, Japan. The TL in Marysville, Ohio, alongside Honda Accords. While the RL feels slightly more upmarket, it’s entirely psychological. Which is stupid to the point of imbecility. While Acura customers await the arrival of a V8 RL (or not, on both counts), Honda should have tuned their instantly demoted flagship for comfort. Put them torques (sorry, couldn’t resist) lower down in the rev range and added huge dollops of mush to the suspension. How much could it cost to detune the damn thing?

More to the point, how much did it cost Acura to debase the RL nameplate by replacing it with a less expensive alternative? Not a lot, one imagines, as the company has already sacrificed the legendary Legend to the gods of German-aping alpha numeric model designations. And priced the RL right off any sane comparison shopper’s vehicle list. And, generally, screwed the pooch. So it’s lose-lose for all concerned—save those who wouldn’t dream of buying an $50k RL. Which is a large and ever-increasing population.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 54 comments
  • Klossfam Klossfam on Feb 06, 2009

    Robert - Some tools at Temple of VTEC didn't appreciate your capsule but I was highly entertained...The RL is possibly the most irrelevant luxo (sort of) sedan on the road today...Keep on doing God's work! My Post at TOV>>>> Re: RL Gets Ripped a New One... 02-05-2009 22:18 klossfam: This sums it up and I totally agree with Mr. Farago from TTAC... http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/capsule-review-2009-acura-rl/ _____________ HondaMotorCo007: What waste of time. The article is truly garbage and it seems as though all those posts at the bottom were written by the same person. _____________ Acuradrian: agree ______________ klossfam: If you don't find TTAC funny, then you have no sense of humor whatsoever...or you are blinded by the reflection off the beak of the nearest 2009 Acura product...TTAC is correct 90% of the time.

  • Jcow4096 Jcow4096 on Feb 06, 2009

    It occurs to me that all of the remarkable cars put out in America as Acuras in the past have truthfully been rebadged Hondas. The NSX, the Integra, the Legend, the TSX: all Hondas with a fancy "A" on the hood. To me, Acura always fought the good fight with one-hand tied behind its back. Only recently has it been given leave to branch out on its own, especially with its new advanced design center. And now Acura is finding out that this premium, luxury thing isn't as easy as it seems. Still, had this been the old Acura, maybe we could have gotten the European Civic hatchback as an Acura RSX? Maybe only I am dreaming this particular dream. To this review: outside of the Acura, exterior sheet metal, Honda has missed with this arrow and it's target "market segment". It normally puzzles me that in a discussion about the modern Acura, everybody brings up how Honda has failed. In this case, I agree. Though I disagree that the 2009 RL is yet another indicator that Honda has lost its way. That Honda's corporate culture nicely coincided with the sport compact/car enthusiast demand in the 80's and 90's doesn't mean that the mothership has jumped the shark in the new millennium. The shark swims this way, Honda keeps skiing that way. This lady's not for turning, and all that. Honda's products still exemplify the core qualities as they ever have: offering advanced engines, offering maximum machine in an minimalistic package, offering environmentally conscientious products.

  • Carson D I thought that this was going to be a comparison of BFGoodrich's different truck tires.
  • Tassos Jong-iL North Korea is saving pokemon cards and amibos to buy GM in 10 years, we hope.
  • Formula m Same as Ford, withholding billions in development because they want to rearrange the furniture.
  • EV-Guy I would care more about the Detroit downtown core. Who else would possibly be able to occupy this space? GM bought this complex - correct? If they can't fill it, how do they find tenants that can? Is the plan to just tear it down and sell to developers?
  • EBFlex Demand is so high for EVs they are having to lay people off. Layoffs are the ultimate sign of an rapidly expanding market.
Next