Review: 2009 Toyota Camry SE

Sajeev Mehta
by Sajeev Mehta

Fact: high school reunions make their attendees change their long-standing beliefs about their former classmates. Consider the quiet girl nobody noticed who turned into a beautiful woman when nobody was looking. That’s my first reaction to meeting the Toyota Camry SE on a fast sweeper. And while the inner-teenager never forgot the person from yesteryear, do Pistonheads need to give the rarely mentioned, often overlooked Camry SE another chance? Or do some things never change?

There’s good reason the Camry SE takes the lion’s share of bandwidth on Toyota’s website. But as vintage car collectors often say, this one’s a twenty-footer at best. From there, the studly ground effects, sleek fog lights and blacked out rear bumper give the mundane Camry a lower and wider (looking) stance. Walk any closer and its afterthought attachment methodology looks right at home in an APC catalog. Even with the subtle rear wing successfully muting the egregious Bangle Butt homage, the SE’s only bright spot is a deep dish, trapezoidal black out grille lifted from the last-gen Mustang. You can’t fix ugly.

But wait, there’s less! The SE takes the rightly-panned interior quality of the current Camry and tries to make amends. The revised Optitron gauge faces go from seriously silly to somewhat serious with the complementary silver interior accents surrounding the driver. While the SE’s unique seat covers have a touch more style, grip and comfort, the cabin’s real claim to fame is the tiller: a tasty three-spoke dish with a meaty (leather-wrapped) rim that’s perfect for what makes this option package so appealing.

But a Boxster it ain’t. Let’s be clear: this is the sedan of choice for many if not most Americans. Fine with me: there’s plenty of room for five, a decent stereo and all the trappings of modest modern sedans. And the Camry is the no-brainer choice for not-so-picky families. Which leads to the SE’s biggest downside: a rear strut-tower brace translates into a fixed rear seat.

While the ski-pass rear cubby is a smart concession from Toyota, the omission of the big black hole shall wrinkle customer’s noses. On the plus side, the bench’s back cushion feels better than the flat-chested affair of a mere Camry LE. More to the point, one turn out of the driveway makes cargo hauling a distant memory.

The extra cargo space is no big loss when Toyota makes a Camry that puts driver involvement in the driver’s seat. With their self-proclaimed “sport tuned” shocks, springs and extra body bracing, the SE carves and cuts with negligible body roll. The 3300lb body stays flat, and understeer comes fashionably late to the party. Yes, really.

Combined with standard 17” wheels, even the SE’s (supposedly unchanged) steering feels ideally weighted and more accurate than its LE brother. Going with the refined body motions, braking is more controlled and distinctly easy on nose dive. To say this model moves better than other Camry’s is disingenuous; the SE could be the best handling family sedan in the country.

If you’re thinking the Camry SE builds upon the solid foundation of the base model, the powertrain won’t disappoint. Sure, there’s a rev-happy V6 in the options list. But with the fuel economy penalty, extra cost, and interference with the SE’s delightful dynamics, the 158 horse four-cylinder mill is a smarter choice. Only the most determined leadfoot misses the extra grunt around town, though highway passing is a chore even with a nicely matched automatic doing a fine job swapping between five cogs. Ah, the things we do to avoid mid-corner torque steer.

And with every give, there’s another take. The Camry’s trademark float and wallow go back to the Brougham from whence they came. Even with a rock-solid chassis, the ride is distinctly Germanic in demeanor, thumping on pavement joints and crashing through potholes. If the Camry’s perceived dynamic qualities were a brand unto itself, there’d be a Farago-esque rant about sending the SE to detention for its poor behavior. Maybe that’s why I rarely see the SE prowling the streets, hungry for pavement and recognition.

And let’s face it; brand loyalty is a quality ToMoCo has by the metric ton. Add the Camry’s requisite blend of bland styling and (Buick) Park Avenue dynamics and you have the most obvious formula for success since the Yalta Conference. If the unique tuning of the Camry SE met its maker in Toyota’s current financial predicament, would anyone notice?

Our readers know there’s a Pistonhead slant to every review in our portfolio, and the Camry SE is four doors of “pleasant surprise” in a place we’d never expect. Hell, it’s a sleeper of the highest order with a good driver. So if a Pistonhead is forced (by familial relations or otherwise) into America’s best selling car, take the cake that’s both available and edible.

Sajeev Mehta
Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 58 comments
  • DinoDan DinoDan on May 29, 2009

    The Camry is a good basic platform. I have a 2003 Camry LE 2.4 that I bought new exactly 6 years ago. I added a front strut brace fom the SE, TRD lowering springs, swaybars from the SE, KYB GR2 shocks, and 17" wheels with 215/50-17 tires. I also fitted an Injen short ram intake and TRD rear exhaust section. A Wheelskin leather steering wheel cover and TRD shift knob (yes, it's a 5-speed) complete the picture. The car handles extremely well, and while not terribly fast in a straight line (Car & Driver got 0-60 in 8.2 secs.), throttle response is excellent, and it sounds great! Add to that the Toyota bullet-proof reliability and 32 mpg on the highway (with an 18 gallon long-range fuel tank), and I have a car that plan on keeping for a long, long time.

  • LazyJCruiser LazyJCruiser on Mar 09, 2010

    Thought I would enlighten the skeptics of the Camry SE. I drive a V8 Hemi as an everyday driver. I also drive a Pontiac G8 and a Zo6 on the weekends. My driving experiences are as spirited on the road as they can be. I look at cars very doubtful when I drive a friend's car or just test drive one for fun, so when I say this, let me just clear up the confusion of any outdated opinions of the Camry SE. I am wary of Toyota's sensitive breaking, mediocre take offs, and body rolls, but then I test drove a Camry SE V6. DO NOT LIMIT YOURSELF TO THE 4 BANGER. You will be disappointed. I accelerated out of the dealership with a forced-open mind. The Camry Sprints close to the power of my HEMI with less torque steer than I've felt from a front-wheel drive in a long time. As I hit a few bank turns on bridges, I had my doubts, but there WASN'T that intimidating point of body roll or slippage that I expected. I can't wait for my GAS PEDAL to stick so that I'll have a reason to drive this SE like a scolded dog. Sorry for the ramble, but a 4-door sedan that runs so well, and has buckets seats that make you feel secure is worth a minute or two to praise. Enjoy, if you can handle the price tag.

  • RHD The analyses above are on the nose.It's a hell of a good car, but the mileage is reaching the point where things that should have worn out a long time ago, and didn't, will, such as the alternator, starter, exhaust system, PS pump, and so on. The interiors tend to be the first thing to show wear, other than the tires, of course. The price is too high for a car that probably has less than a hundred thousand miles left in it without major repairs. A complete inspection is warranted, of course, and then a lower offer based on what it needs. Ten grand for any 18-year-old car is a pretty good chunk of change. It would be a very enjoyable, ride, though.
  • Fred I would get the Acura RDX, to replace my Honda HR-V. Both it and the CRV seats are uncomfortable on longer trips.
  • RHD Now that the negative Nellies have chimed in...A reasonably priced electric car would be a huge hit. There has to be an easy way to plug it in at home, in addition to the obvious relatively trickle charge via an extension cord. Price it under 30K, preferably under 25K, with a 200 mile range and you have a hit on your hands. This would be perfect for a teenager going to high school or a medium-range commuter. Imagine something like a Kia Soul, Ford Ranger, Honda CR-V, Chevy Malibu or even a Civic that costs a small fraction to fuel up compared to gasoline. Imagine not having to pay your wife's Chevron card bill every month (then try to get her off of Starbuck's and mani-pedi habits). One car is not the solution to every case imaginable. But would it be a market success? Abso-friggin-lutely. And TTAC missed today's announcement of the new Mini Aceman, which, unfortunately, will be sold only in China. It's an EV, so it's relevant to this particular article/question.
  • Ajla It would. Although if future EVs prove relatively indifferent to prior owner habits that makes me more likely to go used.
  • 28-Cars-Later One of the biggest reasons not to purchase an EV that I hear is...that they just all around suck for almost every use case imaginable.
Next