CS FirstBoston: GM Headed for a 40% Jan. Sales Drop

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

• We expect the annualized light vehicle selling rate (SAAR) to run in a range of 10.0 – 10.3 million units in January, the midpoint of which would be about 34% below the year-ago pace of 15.4 million, and a little softer than last month’s pace of 10.3 million.

• Unit volume (selling day adjusted) should be down in a range of 35% – 37% versus January 2008, compared to a decline of about 35% in 4Q08. The seasonal factors are favorable this month, which explains how unit volume could be down more than the annualized selling rate.

• The industry faces significant sequential and year-over-year sales headwinds from lower daily rental deliveries in January. Demand from rental car companies is weak; but the decline in deliveries will be exacerbated by severe production declines in January as daily rent vehicles typically turn quickly from production to delivery.

• By maker, we see GM sales down in a range of 40% – 42% year-to-year, with market share dipping to around 22% or less, compared to share of 24.4% in December, and versus 23.9% in the year-ago month. We see the sequential decline in share as partly driven by fewer daily rent deliveries.

• We look for Ford sales to be down between 31% – 33% in January, with market share landing at around 15%, up modestly from the 14.9% share posted in December, and up from 14.1% in January 2008. The new F-150 should give Ford a boost relative to GM, as it has taken share over the last several months (though partly owing to clearing out the old model year).

• We expect the light truck mix to take a breather in January, declining to around 51%, from 52.7% in December. In addition to the average gasoline pump price edging higher this month, it is normal for the truck mix to decline from December to January.

• We think Big 3 inventories are likely to end January about 23% overstocked. Specifically, we see GM dealer stocks ending the month about 25% overstocked, and we see Ford ending January about 10% overstocked. This is consistent with our forecast calling for March-end inventories to be at or below normal levels at GM and Ford, based on deep Q1 production cuts.

• Based on our full-year sales forecast of 12 million units, we’re clearly looking for sales to ride an upward trajectory in 2009. However we don’t expect annual sales of 12 million vehicles to be enough to get the stocks working in this group. For more details see our 2009 outlook report from January 13, Sideways Is Not Good Enough; US Sales to Stabilize at 12.0M in 2009.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • Anonymous Anonymous on Jan 30, 2009

    Bunter- If it amuses you, then by all means continue as I would not want to rain on your parade. And no, I am not an employee of GM or Chrysler. Or Toyolet either. I have my own contempt and disdain issues. But towards different companies than you. Have a splendid day, Best wishes and regards Bridge

  • Jerry weber Jerry weber on Jan 31, 2009

    One final thought about the schadtfreude that some use on the japanese brands to say they are just as bad off as GM Ford & chrysler. Not so fast; if one company loses 40% of the market and another 25% (GM vs Toyota), then didn't toyota pickup market share even in a down market?

  • Lou_BC Blows me away that the cars pictured are just 2 door vehicles. How much space do you need to fully open them?
  • Daniel J Isn't this sort of a bait and switch? I mean, many of these auto plants went to the south due to the lack of unions. I'd also be curious as how, at least in my own state, unions would work since the state is a right to work state, meaning employees can still work without being apart of the union.
  • EBFlex No they shouldn’t. It would be signing their death warrant. The UAW is steadfast in moving as much production out of this country as possible
  • Groza George The South is one of the few places in the U.S. where we still build cars. Unionizing Southern factories will speed up the move to Mexico.
  • FreedMike I'd say that question is up to the southern auto workers. If I were in their shoes, I probably wouldn't if the wages/benefits were at at some kind of parity with unionized shops. But let's be clear here: the only thing keeping those wages/benefits at par IS the threat of unionization.
Next