You Go To War With The Neighborhood Electric Vehicle You Have, Not The Neighborhood Electric Vehicle You Want

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

From Defense News comes word that the United States Army is purchasing 4,000 neighborhood electric vehicles(NEVs) for use as on-base transport. Six of Chrysler’s Global Electric Motors (GEM) NEVs were delivered in a ceremony at Fort Meyer which was probably intended to highlight the army’s long-term efficiency goals. But something must have been lost in the bureaucratic translation. “We hope by showing the rest of the country what we can do with electric vehicles we can potentially drive the technology and the market, including the Chevy Volt [and] the Tesla that are out there now, and show a greater demand,” said Paul Bollinger, deputy assistant secretary of the Army for Energy and Partnerships. I’m sorry sir, but what does the military have to do with a car that doesn’t exist and a $100k sportstoy? The NEVs probably make a lot of sense for on-base, especially if they can give it a sweet military nickname to wipe out memories of the cutesy GEM moniker. But seriously, Volt and Tesla? Whiskey Tango Foxtrot? Once the military reaches for its wallet though, there’s no knowing what might happen.

The army is serious about energy efficiency for a vast number of reasons. But according to Bollinger, “it is all about the battery technology.” And the specter of “foreign battery dependence” has clearly troubled the professionally paranoid. “One of the things we are looking at in the Army and spending millions of dollars on is enhancing battery technology not only for our vehicles but for our installations. If we put large amounts of renewable energy on our installations, be it solar or wind, it needs to be able to store that power when the sun is not up or the wind is not blowing.”

And by “spending millions,” he means that the military is (among other things) holding an EV contest. “A notice of intent to lease is on the street now. GSA [General Services Administration] will take all the responses and make a selection. We hope to have vehicles no later than April,” says Bollinger. “This is the first part of showing the industry that we are serious about electric vehicles and that we are going to buy more.” And probably not from BYD. No word on who is applying, but one imagines that few things would be more welcome in Detroit right now than a nice big military contract.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 16 comments
  • Srynerson Srynerson on Jan 15, 2009
    “We hope by showing the rest of the country what we can do with electric vehicles we can potentially drive the technology and the market, including the Chevy Volt [and] the Tesla that are out there now, and show a greater demand,” said Paul Bollinger, deputy assistant secretary of the Army for Energy and Partnerships. The military's doing product placements now? I wonder how many NASCAR-type stickers you could fit on an aircraft carrier.
  • Threeer Threeer on Jan 15, 2009

    Echo the fact that these make sense on base as utility vehicles. On most of the bases that I was assigned to, I could ride my bicycle faster than most cars could drive! And if it cuts down on fuel consumption, why not? Who says that all of the maintenance folk or service groups need to drive trucks? I'd be happy to be assigned one of these little buggers for light duty around base.

  • Rochester After years of self-driving being in the news, I still don't understand the psychology behind it. Not only don't I want this, but I find the idea absurd.
  • Douglas This timeframe of Mercedes has the self-disintegrating engine wiring harness. Not just the W124, but all of them from the early 90's. Only way to properly fix it is to replace it, which I understand to be difficult to find a new one/do it/pay for. Maybe others have actual experience with doing so and can give better hope. On top of that, it's a NH car with "a little bit of rust", which means to about anyone else in the USA it is probably the rustiest W124 they have ever seen. This is probably a $3000 car on a good day.
  • Formula m How many Hyundai and Kia’s do not have the original engine block it left the factory with 10yrs prior?
  • 1995 SC I will say that year 29 has been a little spendy on my car (Motor Mounts, Injectors and a Supercharger Service since it had to come off for the injectors, ABS Pump and the tool to cycle the valves to bleed the system, Front Calipers, rear pinion seal, transmission service with a new pan that has a drain, a gaggle of capacitors to fix the ride control module and a replacement amplifier for the stereo. Still needs an exhaust manifold gasket. The front end got serviced in year 28. On the plus side blank cassettes are increasingly easy to find so I have a solid collection of 90 minute playlists.
  • MaintenanceCosts My own experiences with, well, maintenance costs:Chevy Bolt, ownership from new to 4.5 years, ~$400*Toyota Highlander Hybrid, ownership from 3.5 to 8 years, ~$2400BMW 335i Convertible, ownership from 11.5 to 13 years, ~$1200Acura Legend, ownership from 20 to 29 years, ~$11,500***Includes a new 12V battery and a set of wiper blades. In fairness, bigger bills for coolant and tire replacement are coming in year 5.**Includes replacement of all rubber parts, rebuild of entire suspension and steering system, and conversion of car to OEM 16" wheel set, among other things
Next