NHTSA Study: Speed a Critical Factor in 5% of Crashes

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

The National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey (short form here) is a landmark study. It’s first time the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) has tackled the issue head-on (so to speak) in nearly 30 years. According to the final report, “traveling too fast” was the “critical pre-crash event” in only five percent of the 6,949 cases studied. In fact, in 12.2 percent of crashes, the vehicle was “stopped.” “Turning or crossing at intersection” was the number one critical pre-crash event (36 percent), followed by “Off the edge of the road” (22 percent). That said, NHTSA found “driving too fast for conditions” [NB: not necessarily over the speed limit] and “too fast for curve” were the number one and two “decision errors.” But top of the pile only means they accounted for 8.4 percent and 4.9 percent of “Critical Reasons for Pre-Crash Event Attributed to Drivers.” The major culprit after the jump.

Those of you who consider inadequate driver training and/or lax licensing a national tragedy have new ammunition. “About 41 percent of the driver-related critical reasons were recognition errors that include inattention, internal and external distractions, inadequate surveillance, etc. Of these, the most frequently occurring critical reason was inadequate surveillance that refers to a situation in which a driver failed to look, or looked but did not see, when it was essential to safely complete a vehicle maneuver.

“This critical reason was assigned to drivers in about 21 percent of crashes… About 33 percent of the driver-related critical reasons were decision errors that included too fast for conditions (8.4%), too fast for curve (4.9%), false assumption of others’ actions (4.5%), illegal maneuver (3.8%), and misjudgment of gap or others’ speed (3.2%). In about 10 percent of the crashes, the critical reason was a performance error, such as overcompensation (4.9%), poor directional control (4.7%), etc.”

Although vehicle-related causation table in the short form document was notable by its absence, vehicle manufacturers don’t get off Scott-free.

“The researchers, through their assessment of the vehicles, also assigned critical reasons to the vehicles. In such cases, failure of the tires/wheels was the most frequent vehicle-related critical reason followed by the failure of the braking system. The design and refinement of dashboard warning systems monitoring the status of critical vehicle elements such as the brake system, tire pressure, tread depth, etc., will benefit from such information.”

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 19 comments
  • Aren Cambre Aren Cambre on Dec 07, 2008
    There is, perhaps, a further argument to be made regarding indirect causation. Your logic's twisted. If you're going so fast that you cannot react, then speed is a cause. While excess speed may have contributed to the existence of only a small fraction of crashes, it may have contributed to increased severity in a larger number of accidents... Shouldn't traffic enforcement be about crash prevention? On a general note: Is this a republic? Remember "Of The People, By The People, For The People"? How do either justify our oppressive, revenue-centric anti-speed crusade?
  • Anonymous Anonymous on Feb 09, 2009

    Not to dig up too old a topic (I was researching this for work) but the state of Massachusetts DOT just spent untold amounts of money getting rid of the two big roundabouts (called "rotaries" locally) that used to get you on and off Cape Cod via the Bourne and Sagamore bridges. The Cape itself still has its share of rotaries, but Mass DOT determined that the two just off the Cape caused more problems than they solved. Myself, I'm pro roundabout. The way some of the big ones in England are set up, they're a feat of traffic engineering.

  • ToolGuy "I have my stance -- I won't prejudice the commentariat by sharing it."• Like Tim, I have my opinion and it is perfect and above reproach (as long as I keep it to myself). I would hate to share it with the world and risk having someone critique it. LOL.
  • SCE to AUX Sure, give them everything they want, and more. Let them decide how long they keep their jobs and their plant, until both go away.
  • SCE to AUX Range only matters if you need more of it - just like towing capacity in trucks.I have a short-range EV and still manage to put 1000 miles/month on it, because the car is perfectly suited to my use case.There is no such thing as one-size-fits all with vehicles.
  • Doug brockman There will be many many people living in apartments without dedicated charging facilities in future who will need personal vehicles to get to work and school and for whom mass transit will be an annoying inconvenience
  • Jeff Self driving cars are not ready for prime time.
Next