Mercedes A, B Class Get Down In Motown

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

If you journey to the Detroit Auto Show this winter, you will get a chance to see the new Mercedes A and B Class models. I know, I know. Who cares, right? (No points for guessing Automotive News [sub]) Especially since the Benz Boys will be headlining their Concept BlueZero hybrid/alt-fuel roadshow at the wasteland formerly known as the Detroit Auto Show. But did you know that all of those fancy futuremobiles will be based on the “sandwich board” platform which first debuted in production on the original A-Class? Apparently it makes for a lot of flexibility with powertrain choices. The new A and B will ditch the intriguing but space-limiting concept for a standard FWD layout, but at least the B and “likely” the A as are headed stateside sometime in 2011. Absent a GM bankruptcy-triggered end of times, of course. And though we won’t be in Detroit to snap our own photos of these Euro-hatches (right, boss?), their American ambitions bring up a wrinkle on the stimulating discussion on our national ambivalence towards compact cars.

Honda sold the Jazz abroad for nearly five years before bringing it here as the Fit. Toyota has been selling a Yaris hatchback in Europe since 1999. Mercedes has sold an A-class since 1997. Fit and Yaris sales have been as hot as anything else this year, although gas prices clearly drove sales. Still, it seems to me that foreign automakers kept their sub-compact and compact vehicles out of the US market because they thought Americans were biased against them. Even though efficiency and practicality were central to their early success, the Japanese brands kept quality subcompacts from the market while their US offerings became larger and heavier with every year.

Was it, as John McCain might put it, that they came to change the American market and the American market changed them? Or is this all a mechanical function of the price at the pump? If there is a bias against compact (and sub-compact) cars in this country, is it the product of a Detroit profit-driving marketing strategy? Or a natural outgrowth of the American landscape and lifestyle? And where the rubber really meets the second-guessing, should the Fit, Yaris and now the A-class have been brought to America sooner than they were/are?

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • Robert Schwartz Robert Schwartz on Dec 16, 2008

    When in London in October, I saw a number of Bs. I thought they were nice enough. I don't recall seeing any As.

  • Jerseydevil Jerseydevil on Dec 16, 2008

    I could not be happier, i love little tossable high content cars. Bravo! The sooner the better!

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next