By on December 18, 2008

Well, it was only a matter of time. After all, the ethanol industry receives about $7b in annual government subsidies and still can’t turn a profit when times are good. Why, they’re going to need the most special bailout of all! The WSJ’s Washington Wire reports that the Renewable Fuels Association recently sent a bailout-begging mission to DC. The RFA lobbyists met with congressional and Obama staffers and reportedly “provided them with some ideas on how to craft the language of” an economic recovery package. Run that phrase through the DC bullshit decoder, and it turns out that the RFA team was actually lobbying for a massive bailout package. And a  hauntingly familiar massive bailout package at that. The RFA is seeking $1 billion short-term credit facility so ethanol producers could finance current operations (think “bridge loans”); a $50 billion federal loan guarantee program to finance investment in new renewable fuel production capacity and supporting infrastructure (think “136 loans”); and a requirement that any auto maker receiving federal aid only produce new vehicles that can run on any blend up to 85% ethanol, beginning with the 2010 model season (give up on democracy). Meanwhile, the RFA’s Matt Hartwig insists that “we’re not asking for a specific bailout, but rather, as a trade association, we’re providing ideas to an incoming Congress and a new administration about ways to bolster the domestic renewable fuel industry.” Right. (Hat Tip: Reason Hit & Run)

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

7 Comments on “E85 Boondoggle Of The Day: A Very Bailout Christmas...”


  • avatar
    porschespeed

    “we’re not asking for a specific bailout, but rather, as a trade association, we’re providing ideas to an incoming Congress and a new administration about ways to bolster the domestic renewable fuel industry.”

    I’m not robbing your bank. Freed from the burden of counting that cash, I’m providing you with an opportunity to spend more time with your children. Don’t you want to spend more time with your family? Isn’t that what really matters?

  • avatar
    Richard Chen

    PEOTUS Obama is floating the idea of phasing out the ethanol import tax, so this must be the “equal and opposite reaction”.

  • avatar
    no_slushbox

    Time to boycott ethanol. Well, not entirely, but for use in cars.

    I wonder if there is any website that lists gas stations offering 100% petrol (i.e. that have gotten through “loopholes” in their states’ laws allowing them to actually sell their customers the lowest priced product).

    Getting rid of the ethanol tariff would be brilliant. As I learned on the History Channel, moonshiners are much more fond of sugar than corn.

    While they are at it they should kill the tariff on non-fermented sugar so Americans can eat real food again.

  • avatar
    John Horner

    “While they are at it they should kill the tariff on non-fermented sugar so Americans can eat real food again.”

    +1 to that. The main reason corn syrup is used as a sweetener in so many domestic foods is that stupid cane sugar tax.

  • avatar
    PabloKoh

    More agribusiness crap. These big businesses and their Washington lobbyists have ruined the reputation of ethanol as an auto fuel. Ethanol from agribusiness products suck. Hell, agribusiness products suck. The amount of natural gas based pesticides and fertilizers that they use to grow corn is just shameful. We need to start growing crops with sustainable systems of rotation instead of crying to the government asking for loans to buy more fertilizer to spread on the fields filled with seeds bred to grow only with fertilizer.
    But I disagree with the author in regards to making all cars capable of running on ethanol. If the Big Three wants my money I want a choice of fuels. The cost increase at the factory is less than $50 per car. What is wrong with a choice? You fill your car with gas. I will fill mine with ethanol.

  • avatar
    charly

    Petrol with a small amount of ethanol is better petrol than pure petrol so you don’t want a list with 100% pure petrol, but a 98.5% pure list would be good.

  • avatar
    Luther

    Don’t we have a 4th Amendment right to exterminate parasites?


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Authors

  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • Tycho de Feyter, China
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Faisal Ali Khan, India