Payback is A Bitch: Hedgies To Sue Porsche For Billions

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

In a report to appear Monday, the German magazine Der Spiegel will write that “several law firms are compiling material for lawsuits to hold Porsche liable. They are working for hedge funds which had lost billions of Euros.” That’s news to Porsche CFO Holger Härter. He says he hasn’t heard of anybody who wants revenge or restitution. “I don’t even know who might have been hurt.” On Sunday, FAZ will publish an interview with Härter. First question: “When will the hedge fund called Porsche close its sheet metal factory?” Härter’s answer: “Our core business is and remains the automobile.” Everybody knows: not true. Porsche made more profits than sales in the last fiscal year. Of €8.6b in profits, only €1b were generated in that sheet metal factory. €7.6b were generated with derivatives. That was in the last fiscal year, which ended July 31. God, Härter and Wiedeking only know how much the Porsche hedge fund generated in the months thereafter, when the VW stock went wilder than girls at Mardi Gras. Härter now says they didn’t really mean it. Here is Härter’s version:


When Porsche started to think about taking an interest in Volkswagen, Härter says, they did the same any prudent businessman would do: hedge a little. Take out some insurance against, god forbid, a rising VW stock. At that time, the VW stock traded at around €30– pretty much the same level as it did for many, many years before. Shortly after Porsche innocently took out insurance, the VW stock started to inexplicably climb. It doubled in 2006. Doubled again in 2007. It shot up to over €1000 in October.

Praise the Lord for insurance! Härter claims he doesn’t like these high stock prices at all. “If the stock would have stayed at the old levels, we would have had to pay much less taxes than now.” Yes, profits can be such a bear when the taxman cometh. Everybody will have sympathy.

While lawyers are sorting their paperwork, Härter is already preparing his defense. Härter to the FAZ: “These accusations are totally without merit. We deny any responsibility. We observed the law. We duped nobody.” We’ll see how that plays in court.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 24 comments
  • Martin Schwoerer Martin Schwoerer on Dec 02, 2008

    Tireguy: thank you for your informative posts! In particular, thanks for sharing the background information about the cash settled options, etc.

  • Blowfish Blowfish on Dec 02, 2008

    Porsche had long ago notified that they owned more than 30%. Any shortseller knew that Porsche could add further 20% without further need of notification. Further anyone knew that Lower Saxony owned further 20% and would not let go. Finally, since the takover of Contiental any serious trader knows that companies can also try to get options on shares through so called “Cash settled option”, where usually the banks secure against their risk by buying the stock themselves. This happened here for about 30% of VW stock. Consequence: the Hedgies just were stupid and greedy. Does this not ring a bell? If u're going to short anything u need to know first if thats a strong co. Porsche or any of these German co. got loads of cash, unlike the penny stocks of Vancouver exchange in its heyday. Just about anybody can have a co. U can make your dog secretary & CEO, a couple of beat up Buicks a wood desk listed as assets. Sollt these folks mistaken the Iceberg as a beautiful beach that u can go full tilt to land on the beach thats all.

  • Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
Next